The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?

  • 11 Replies
  • 21123 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« on: 12/12/2008 21:13:23 »
Water is. I don't think mercury is. So what does "wet" mean?
« Last Edit: 19/12/2008 09:44:21 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9092
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #1 on: 12/12/2008 22:20:41 »
The verb to wet : to coat with a film of liquid.
The ability of a liquid to wet a surface is inversely proportional to its surface tension.
Water has a high surface tension, so most liquids are "wetter" than water, (e.g. pure alcohol).
Mercury, like water, has an unusually high surface tension.
« Last Edit: 12/12/2008 22:26:53 by RD »
Logged
 

lyner

  • Guest
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #2 on: 12/12/2008 22:24:09 »
Adhesion vs cohesive forces, I would suggest. Because of it's high specific heat capacity, once water  has wetted you it also manages to feel very cold. Other wet liquids - like light oils - stick but don't feel as cold.
I don't think there's an official definition.
Mercury wets copper braid very well btw.
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9092
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #3 on: 12/12/2008 22:44:52 »
Mercury reacts with (dissolves) copper ...

Quote
Metals such as tin, silver, and copper will form compounds with the mercury.
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2003-04/1049252616.Gb.r.html
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #4 on: 12/12/2008 23:05:25 »
hmmm, interesting
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #5 on: 13/12/2008 00:29:06 »
Water dissolves lots of things - eventually.
I guess dissolving is the ultimate attraction.
Logged
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #6 on: 13/12/2008 18:03:56 »
Quote from: RD on 12/12/2008 22:44:52
Mercury reacts with (dissolves) copper ...
Quote
Metals such as tin, silver, and copper will form compounds with the mercury.
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2003-04/1049252616.Gb.r.html
Ok, but, at room temperature, a mercury drop will first wet a copper surface, then, after xyz days/weeks will have (perhaps) completely dissolved in it. To increase reaction speed you would use fine copper powder. By the way, using fine Cu powder is a way (invented by me and never experimented [:)]) of removing very little Hg drops from pavement after a possible crash of an Hg thermometre.
Maybe gold is even more efficient, but it depends on your budget...  [;)]
« Last Edit: 13/12/2008 18:11:09 by lightarrow »
Logged
 

lyner

  • Guest
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #7 on: 13/12/2008 21:47:11 »
Never drop mercury on the floor of an aeroplane - it eats its way through to the outside as the dissolved aluminium oxidises at the mercury air surface.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5529
  • Activity:
    71%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #8 on: 18/12/2008 10:24:19 »
What about when you get down to the molecular level? What if you had a single molecule of water held to a single molecule of sugar by intermolecular forces? Is the molecule of sugar "wet"? If not, then how large does a group of molecules have to be before can be wet?
Logged
 



Offline Monox D. I-Fly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 438
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #9 on: 13/01/2018 06:04:47 »
Quote from: RD on 12/12/2008 22:20:41
The verb to wet : to coat with a film of liquid.

Going with this definition, can someone wet something with lava?
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9006
  • Activity:
    75%
  • Thanked: 883 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #10 on: 14/01/2018 20:38:54 »
Perhaps one aspect that did not appear in the above discussion is the type of forces between molecules & atoms.
- Water is a "Polar" molecule, with the Oxygen end being more negative than the Hydrogen end. Water interacts more strongly with Polar molecules (eg water) than it does with non-Polar molecules. So water will not wet things like wax, which is pretty much non-Polar.
- Mercury is a metal, which achieves much of its surface tension by sharing electrons. This interaction also works when in contact with copper or gold, but not when in contact with glass (an insulator).

The meniscus of mercury in glass is the opposite direction of the meniscus of water in glass.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meniscus_(liquid)
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21353
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 486 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?
« Reply #11 on: 14/01/2018 21:06:57 »
This might help
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_angle
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Are you aware that a scientific fact can decay? (Fact Decay?)

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 2366
Last post 10/06/2016 11:41:24
by evan_au
Is there - grrrrr - any scientific justification for - GRRRRR - burning stubble?

Started by GeezerBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 6
Views: 7364
Last post 22/02/2011 22:47:30
by ronro
Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intel

Started by maryakkuttyBoard General Science

Replies: 1
Views: 3603
Last post 23/10/2010 04:24:51
by JimBob
Is Final Theory of Everything generally accepted in the Scientific World today?

Started by Joe L. OganBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 18
Views: 9864
Last post 12/12/2009 18:00:00
by Geezer
Is this Russian service to find funding for scientific projects unique?

Started by Ellina ReshetnikovaBoard General Science

Replies: 0
Views: 1429
Last post 19/10/2016 10:29:14
by Ellina Reshetnikova
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 65 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.