The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. What about the Coal Fires?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What about the Coal Fires?

  • 4 Replies
  • 6455 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CliffordK (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
What about the Coal Fires?
« on: 03/12/2010 16:40:33 »
I see discussions about recent volcanoes (as well as the one in 1816) and their impact on the environment.

Coal Mine (and some Natural Gas) Fires seem to be the forgotten environmental tragedy.

http://ravenwoodorg.org/ggrprogram.aspx


Apparently Australia holds the record for the oldest coal fire, 6,000 years of continuous burning at appropriately named "Burning Mountain".

Several fires in the USA and China have been burning since at least the early 1900's. 

I'm having troubles finding stats on the coal fires, but between 10 and 200 million tons of coal burn each year in China.

A single coal field in Jharia India has had around 37 million tons of coal burn since 1916.

One report indicates that "A single coalmine fire in Shangxi Provence of central China produces approximately 35% more carbon dioxide annually than all vehicles in North America."

The US, of course, has about 200 active coalmine fires, some having been burning for almost a century.

Fighting these fires is supposed to be like fighting Hell's Fire on Earth. 

But are we doing enough?
With the exception of Burning Mountain in Australia, most of the coal fires are due to human activity, or inadequate safety programs.  Some have been direct acts of vandalism.

http://ravenwoodorg.org/ggrprogram.aspx
http://www.earthmagazine.org/earth/article/383-7da-9-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_seam_fire
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2006195,00.html?hpt=C2


(updated estimate of coal burned per year in China, based on additional docs)
« Last Edit: 04/12/2010 12:11:15 by CliffordK »
Logged
 



Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Re: What about the Coal Fires?
« Reply #1 on: 03/12/2010 16:47:41 »
I wouldn;t want to live there!

Is there some extra effect going on here to keep this burning? Volcanism or something?

It seems poor enough that we burn coal fairly inefficiently (on WW average) to generate electricity, but to let it bun unchecked *for years* in the ground is just bonkers!
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

SteveFish

  • Guest
Re: What about the Coal Fires?
« Reply #2 on: 03/12/2010 20:34:47 »
For perspective, I did a quick web search and found that around 7,000 Mt/yr of hard coal plus another 1,000 Mt/yr of brown coal and lignite are currently mined.
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
What about the Coal Fires?
« Reply #3 on: 04/12/2010 12:20:56 »
Quote from: SteveFish on 03/12/2010 20:34:47
For perspective, I did a quick web search and found that around 7,000 Mt/yr of hard coal plus another 1,000 Mt/yr of brown coal and lignite are currently mined.
Interesting...  I think you're close with the estimate.
I'm seeing estimates on the order of 3-4 billion tons a year of coal being produced/utilized, and somewhere on the order of 3.5 billion tons of oil also being consumed globally.

I found additional sources stating China's fires are burning 10 million to 200 million tons a year.  So...  somewhere between 0.1% and 2% of the global petroleum usage is just going up in smoke in China.  Sorry...  hard to get more accurate numbers.

No US or "global" estimate,

So, is this a global tragedy, or merely a cost of doing business?



Logged
 

Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
What about the Coal Fires?
« Reply #4 on: 04/12/2010 12:42:52 »
Quote from: CliffordK on 04/12/2010 12:20:56
So, is this a global tragedy, or merely a cost of doing business?

Maybe it's a sign than primary energy (in the hands of some) is still too cheap (and not just in a monetary sense!)
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.646 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.