The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Science
General Science
Tool for surgery - would this work?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Tool for surgery - would this work?
1 Replies
3187 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
neva30
(OP)
First timers
5
Activity:
0%
Tool for surgery - would this work?
«
on:
24/05/2011 22:14:27 »
Hi,
With the advent of laser scalpels in surgery I wondered whether the following device would be workable or desirable.
A sensor built into the scalpel would detect how much of the light is reflected and refracted from the tissue, and use that to determine the type of tissue it is shining on.
If the laser shines onto a tissue type that the doctor doesn't want damaged, say a vein or artery, then the scalpel would kill the laser and stop cutting.
Perhaps this already exists or is a stupid idea - just wondered what people thought?
Thanks.
«
Last Edit: 24/05/2011 22:16:16 by neva30
»
Logged
CliffordK
Naked Science Forum King!
6596
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 61 times
Site Moderator
Tool for surgery - would this work?
«
Reply #1 on:
24/05/2011 22:49:32 »
Hmmm,
Interesting idea.
Certainly some smaller veins and arteries are sacrificed in surgeries, but one might be able to steer away from the larger ones.
My guess is that such a device would end up shutting itself off too frequently and would end up being frustrating to use.
Perhaps someday we'll have robotic assisted arthroscopic surgery which may utilize fine tissue type recognition.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...