The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?

  • 47 Replies
  • 55216 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #40 on: 21/01/2012 06:31:06 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 21/01/2012 06:17:38

I'm possibly the only person in this thread that has actually done this with a real-time MPG meter.


Oh yeah? I made my own digital MPG meter and stuck it in my VW in 1974.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1678
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 79 times
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #41 on: 21/01/2012 07:01:50 »
Sure, I'm not saying that, sounds fun, but a 1974 VW probably didn't have a fuel injection system, this cut-off trick is done by the fuel injection system.

I used to routinely do this trick on my beemer, I also did mild hypermiling techniques including this one with it during the tanker strike; a 2.7 liter automatic is not the best type for that though, but it did seem to work!
« Last Edit: 21/01/2012 07:04:05 by wolfekeeper »
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #42 on: 21/01/2012 08:59:41 »
I know that my old 84 Renault Encore had an electronic idle speed adjustment screw...
Until something fouled up with the system, and I replaced it with a bolt.

Anyway, I think the car had some kind of electronic in carburetor injection.
Logged
 

Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #43 on: 21/01/2012 14:27:24 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 21/01/2012 06:17:38
I'm possibly the only person in this thread that has actually done this with a real-time MPG meter.

Good to hear it! Shame ya beemer was an automatic though - at least in economy terms.  Some ecomodders go as far as fitting an injector kill-switch - so taking manual control of their fuel feed. It can apparently be of use if using the Pulse & Glide style of motorway driving (if you're courageous enough to do it!).
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #44 on: 21/01/2012 18:58:44 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 21/01/2012 07:01:50
Sure, I'm not saying that, sounds fun, but a 1974 VW probably didn't have a fuel injection system, this cut-off trick is done by the fuel injection system.


Yes, it had a carb, but it actually did have a fuel shut-off solenoid (althought that was there to make sure the engine would stop when you turned off the ignition!)
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1678
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 79 times
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #45 on: 22/01/2012 06:23:38 »
Quote from: peppercorn on 09/01/2012 14:25:33
Quote from: CliffordK on 07/01/2012 19:32:54
I'm also having range problems.  I was getting 35-40 miles this summer.  But, this winter, the range seems to be plummeting to under 20 miles  [:(]
I think all battery techs. suffer from reduced efficiency in the cold (something to do with increased internal resistance perhaps?).
What you need is some nice low-value fuel (in terms of capacity to do useful work at cost) that is onboard simply to warm the batteries and the cabin.  The simplest vs cheapest heater would probably be Propane, but it's hardly in keeping with the electric 'values'.
I reckon Torrefied Wood (think efficiently produced charcoal) is a pretty interesting and underutilised source of cheap heat (and even mech work) especially if you want to move said source around (ie. vehicles).
You can also use electric heaters when plugged in, and the battery may be able to power the heater itself when it's not (with some reduction in range). That's how the Tesla works, it has the same potential problem.
Logged
 

Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #46 on: 22/01/2012 15:01:49 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 22/01/2012 06:23:38
You can also use electric heaters when plugged in, and the battery may be able to power the heater itself when it's not (with some reduction in range). That's how the Tesla works, it has the same potential problem.

Yes, Tesla have gone for the simplest solution to cabin heating; with the Tesla being marketed as a sports car (esp. as it's a two-seater, usually with a soft top) I doubt the average driver is necessarily too worried about a heater anyway!
The thing to remember is electricity is pretty much the highest value energy source there is - so wasting it on making low-value heat seems rather a crime really!
OTOH, I can see that a (mains) plug-in heater option both to pre-heat the battery-box (improving range) and cabin pre-heat (or even a small onboard P.C.M. module) could represent the best compromise between fuel value and simplicity.
Personally I'd still want a small butane heater or similar for those longer journeys though; at least for a car with a 'proper' tin roof [;D].
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Re: Does coasting in neutral use more fuel?
« Reply #47 on: 22/01/2012 18:34:28 »
Quote from: peppercorn on 22/01/2012 15:01:49
Personally I'd still want a small butane heater or similar for those longer journeys though; at least for a car with a 'proper' tin roof ;D .

Ewe could always take a hot-water bottle with ewe.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.638 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.