The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
Cells, Microbes & Viruses
Would archaeologists put dog breeds in the same species?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Would archaeologists put dog breeds in the same species?
1 Replies
3608 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
thedoc
(OP)
Forum Admin
Moderator
Hero Member
510
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 21 times
Would archaeologists put dog breeds in the same species?
«
on:
08/10/2012 11:30:02 »
Thomas Burndrett asked the Naked Scientists:
Hi Dr. Chris,
I have a hypothetical scenario, say in one million years Archeologists are at a dig site and come across the bones/fossils of a great Dane and a mini poodle. In this scenario dogs have been extinct for, say two million years, further, these archeologist have no record of what a dog was or any information about different breeds. Also there is no ability to extract any dna from either of the samples.
My question then, is wouldn't they attribute the wildly different fossils of the two dogs to desperate species? How would they ascertain that they are different breeds?
Great show!
TJ
What do you think?
«
Last Edit: 08/10/2012 11:30:02 by _system
»
Logged
CliffordK
Naked Science Forum King!
6596
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 61 times
Site Moderator
Re: Would archaeologists put dog breeds in the same species?
«
Reply #1 on:
30/10/2012 01:54:26 »
If chromosomes and DNA were available, one would be able to see the similarities between different canines via chromosome and DNA analysis. Even if DNA is not available, archaeologists are discovering that some proteins are able to be recovered from demineralized bone and fossils, although I'm not sure how good such recovered proteins would be for inter-species and intra-species comparisons. Presumably the demineralized proteins can either now be sequenced, or will be able to be sequenced in the not too distant future.
There may be some DNA fragments that can also be recovered from osteoblasts and osteoclasts from ancient demineralized bone and fossils. It may be difficult to get information such as chromosome counts, but some of the DNA may still be able to be sequenced and reassembled.
However, looking at just bones, the Chihuahua and St. Bernard dogs should have a remarkably similar skeletal structure, so the Chihuahuas and St. Bernards at least would be classified as being similar. Presumably some human dug pet graves will also survive into the distant future which will demonstrate the close association between canines and humans.
It may be impossible for archaeologists to distinguish between dogs (canis lupus familiaris), wolves (canis lupus), and coyotes (canis latrans) other than the association with humans, and the use of pet graves. Likewise, foxes (vulpini) may also appear similar to the other dogs and could potentially be confused with them, except, of course, the lack of common pet graves, although being a couple of branches back in the genetic tree the foxes may have some distinct morphological features.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...