The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. Science Experiments
  4. compact NON-Toxic Endothermic reaction able to cool 20ouncs of fluid
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

compact NON-Toxic Endothermic reaction able to cool 20ouncs of fluid

  • 2 Replies
  • 9486 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cmorr (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
compact NON-Toxic Endothermic reaction able to cool 20ouncs of fluid
« on: 05/11/2012 06:52:07 »
Hello,
 I'm looking for a super compact non-toxic endothermic reaction that results in cooling 20 ounces of fluid where the heat is transfered through radiation and not convection. Thus not altering the 20ounces of liquid chemically, but still resulting with a 20-30 degree(F) drop in temperature. The reason for non-toxic is if the chemicals do mix it must still be safe to drink.
Logged
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Re: compact NON-Toxic Endothermic reaction able to cool 20ouncs of fluid
« Reply #1 on: 06/11/2012 00:16:50 »
A place to start looking might be the "instant cold packs".

According to the notes, they have traditionally included a mix of ammonium nitrate and water.  The notes seem to indicate that it is only moderately toxic at pretty high doses, with the LD50 about 2 grams per kilo (for the salt).

I don't think I'd want to drink a lot of it though.

There is also an ammonia nitrate free InstaKoolâ„¢ Instant Cold Pack consisting primarily of Urea: (NH2CONH2) & Biuret: (NH2CONHCONH2), PLUS Water.  The published LD50 for rats and mice is around 11 to 15 g/kilo (of the solids).  That is a LOT!!!

I presume it just gets pissed out in the urine. 

The MSDS does list some GI symptoms, but they tend to be quite conservative.  Still, I'm not sure about eating it.
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Re: compact NON-Toxic Endothermic reaction able to cool 20ouncs of fluid
« Reply #2 on: 06/11/2012 10:56:48 »
Urea is apparently more digestible than biuret.  However, both are apparently used as a cattle feed supplement, although it is also apparently more toxic to cattle than other animals.

Assuming the kidney function is fine, perhaps pure Urea + water might not be too bad.

Ok,  I'm seeing notes:
600 ml water + 400g Urea will drop the temperature from about 20⁰C to about 3⁰C.

However, that would be A LOT OF UREA to eat.  Even if you dropped it down to 60ml water + 40 g Urea, it would still be quite a bit, but perhaps more palatable (occasionally).   
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.316 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.