The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)

  • 13 Replies
  • 8348 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

illusion

  • Guest
Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
« on: 26/12/2012 15:14:03 »
This needs to be removed.
« Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:36:57 by illusion »
Logged
 



Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2876
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #1 on: 26/12/2012 21:59:51 »
    Venus and the Earth are roughly the same size and mass and have roughly the same amount of gravity. The Earth rotates 365 times per orbit, while Venus rotates once, though its orbit is shorter, so the difference in rotation speed of the Earth will only be a bit more than 200 times that of Venus. I haven't clicked on your link yet because you really ought to have addressed this point in the post above and explained how your theory handles this obvious case.
    Logged
     

    Offline Ethos_

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1332
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 18 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #2 on: 27/12/2012 01:36:41 »
    Quote from: David Cooper on 26/12/2012 21:59:51
    you really ought to have addressed this point in the post above and explained how your theory handles this obvious case.
    I agree Dave, and there is another very critical issue which is being left out. To what is this rotation relative? To the nearest planet, to our galaxy, or to the universe itself? I submit that if rotation is the cause, it must be relative to empty space itself and that raises a lot of problems. In the case of the moon, it doesn't rotate relative to the earth. It may rotate around the earth but that's not the same thing. Being that the earth is the nearest body to the moon, I would presume that would eliminate this possibility.

    No, I don't see any connection. I think we just better accept that mass is the cause for the phenomenon we call gravity.
    Logged
    "The more things change, the more they remain the same."
     

    Offline CliffordK

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 6596
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 61 times
    • Site Moderator
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #3 on: 27/12/2012 02:40:47 »
    The effect of rotational velocity is usually calculated with centrifugal/centripetal force.

    de51e0f3fff08c77e1c2a3ea2c3c886c.gif

    0112990bb86598c4800a2fad0c06618d.gif

    where v is the velocity of the object, or in the case of rotation, the rotational velocity at the surface of the object. 

    which you can subtract from the standard gravity calculation,

    0e7a4ee8d1a836441aba08480eb61cce.gif

    and

    51ae078397e395b762f5a16e2d4b45a5.gif

    So, you would get:

    d13693e23163681d271e3b2f191bc20d.gif

    and

    ef2b34d41b5c231f7f4d66930cee61d9.gif

    Of course, the higher the rotational velocity, the lower the overall pull of gravity for objects at the surface.

    As far as rotational velocity affecting the pull between two celestial bodies, I'm not sure.  Does an object spinning in a vacuum experience less weight?

    If you are doing rotational frequency, are seconds appropriate?  The earth rotates once every 24 hours.  The sun poles and equator (and core?) spin at different rates, but say once every 3 weeks or so.  Of course, one can always convert units.
    « Last Edit: 27/12/2012 03:22:53 by CliffordK »
    Logged
     

    Offline Ethos_

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1332
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 18 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #4 on: 27/12/2012 03:42:49 »
    Quote from: CliffordK on 27/12/2012 02:40:47
    Of course, the higher the rotational velocity, the lower the overall pull of gravity for objects at the surface.
    I quite agree, but to suggest that the rotation of a body is responsible for it's gravity pull is beyond reason. Even though the centrifugal force of rotation will counter a portion of the gravitational pull for bodies on it's surface, the total gravitational influence this body exercises over distant bodies is not changed by this rotation. Gravity is the result of a bodies total mass.
    Logged
    "The more things change, the more they remain the same."
     



    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #5 on: 27/12/2012 07:00:43 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:37:25 by illusion »
    Logged
     

    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #6 on: 27/12/2012 07:34:01 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:37:35 by illusion »
    Logged
     

    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #7 on: 27/12/2012 07:47:35 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:37:48 by illusion »
    Logged
     

    Offline David Cooper

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 2876
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 38 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #8 on: 27/12/2012 23:31:08 »
    Quote from: illusion on 27/12/2012 07:00:43
    Quote from: David Cooper on 26/12/2012 21:59:51
    Venus and the Earth are roughly the same size and mass and have roughly the same amount of gravity. The Earth rotates 365 times per orbit, while Venus rotates once, though its orbit is shorter, so the difference in rotation speed of the Earth will only be a bit more than 200 times that of Venus. I haven't clicked on your link yet because you really ought to have addressed this point in the post above and explained how your theory handles this obvious case.

    You can't say that Venus has roughly the same mass than Earth does.

    Why not? I'd say 82% is roughly the same, particularly when comparing them with the rotation speeds which are so much more different. Of course, if rotation is a crucial aspect of generating gravity, there's still plenty of that going on in every particle of Venus, so maybe the difference from the rotation speed of the planet as a whole isn't going to make much difference to that figure, in which case your theory could still fit the facts and I've misjudged it. How big a difference are you talking about? How much extra gravity would Venus have if it was rotating as fast as the Earth?
    Logged
     



    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #9 on: 28/12/2012 06:47:48 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:38:02 by illusion »
    Logged
     

    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #10 on: 01/01/2013 07:07:13 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:38:12 by illusion »
    Logged
     

    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #11 on: 04/01/2013 13:16:26 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:38:21 by illusion »
    Logged
     

    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #12 on: 14/01/2013 12:50:35 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:38:31 by illusion »
    Logged
     



    illusion

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Theory of Everything by illusion (ToEbi)
    « Reply #13 on: 07/02/2013 17:55:23 »
    This needs to be removed.
    « Last Edit: 25/02/2013 16:38:39 by illusion »
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.316 seconds with 54 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.