The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. Does lab-grown meat have a smaller carbon footprint?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does lab-grown meat have a smaller carbon footprint?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3747 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Does lab-grown meat have a smaller carbon footprint?
« on: 03/10/2013 07:30:02 »
Amy Moser  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
You state in the podcast about the lab grown meat that it has a smaller "carbon footprint".

I question this, as someone who has grown cells in a lab and know the large amount of plasticware, chemicals, and growth factors that are needed. This does not even take into account the energy needed for the incubators, sensors, and autoclaves (to sterilize everything). Not to mention the people needed to monitor and handle the cultures. While eventually they MAY be able to grow these in suspension (hard to believe with muscle cells) and eliminate some of the plasticware, but all the other issues will remain. Considering that meat producing animals can be raised on non-arable land, replacing them with other crops may not be feasible.

amy

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 03/10/2013 07:30:02 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Re: Does lab-grown meat have a smaller carbon footprint?
« Reply #1 on: 03/10/2013 09:46:11 »
Is this the podcast, Growing meat in the lab?

Certainly the demands of lab scale processing are different from industrial scale processing, and it is likely that most of the equipment in an industrial facility would be reused, and efficiency would be maximized.  It is a good point though that everything would have to be rigorously sterilized.  Plus, one might need to run an artificial heart/lung, dialysis, and some kind of artificial liver.  We can produce sugars, starches, vitamins, and etc using both organic and lab processes.  Your typical table sugar is fairly pure, I think.  Consider the complications of infection with total parenteral nutrition.  Hopefully it could be grown without bathing the "meat" with antibiotics.

Could one generate power with electrically stimulated contractions?

You are right, however, that we aren't particularly efficient at replicating the efficiency of organic processes.  Thus, improving the process efficiency would be an uphill battle.  And, much of the farmland, say in Texas, either needs irrigated (bringing in other issues), or may be best suited to the cattle industry.  Of course, most of the cattle is at least finished in a feed lot, and doesn't go directly from the range to market. 

Waste from lab grown meat could be tightly managed, hopefully avoiding the development of prions.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.283 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.