0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"Cod liver oil is in the forefront of children's remedies.For long it has been struggling against the scepticism of exact science" Rosenstern: Berl. klin. Wchuschr. 47;822, 1910.
The manner in which M. Bretonneau, of Tours, was induced to give the oil in this disease deserves notice.He had treated the rachitic child of a rich Dutch merchant with preparations of iodine and other means, for some time, without success.He was then told by the father that the elder children had previously suffered under the same malady, and had been cured by the cod liver oil, which, in Holland, was a popular remedy. Bretonneau gave the same substance to his young patient, and was much struck with the very rapid and successful result which followed.He commenced making researches with it on other patients, and it was only then that he learnt for the first time what had been written by the German authors on this subject.He has since given it extensively in rachitis, with the happiest results.This fact was communicated to the Societe de Medicine de Paris, in 1837, by M. Roche. 10. Trousseau: Clinical Medicine, Philadelphia 2: 734, 1882.
How did the cod deficiency affect the evolution of the culture?Zoey
... In each country, the experience was the same: Cod liver oil was used by the fishing people and peasantry; then accidentally observed by some physician, tried by him, and so made known generally to the profession. At first, it was used in chronic rheumatism and gout; then, naturally enough, in other bone and joint diseases, notably rickets, and osteomalacia (which was considered closely allied to gout); then finally in other forms of tuberculosis. It is interesting that its use in tuberculosis should have been by the way of rickets and gout. It is interesting too, that despite the fact that it was so effective in rickets and despite the fact that this efficacy had beeen observed and carefully recorded by reputable and well-known medical writers, it should have fallen into such widespread disuse. It is well recommended and reported as late as the middle of the nineteenth century; but late in that century and early in this one the textbooks of pharmacology all speak of cod liver oil as being useful in tuberculosis and rickets because, and only because, it is easily digested and easily assimilated fat (Potter, 1902; Stevens, 1903; Penzoldt, 1904; Hare, 1907; Cushny, 1911 and 1915; Sollmann, 1917). At the same time appear numerous notes as to the detection, in samples then on the market, of adulteration or substitution of other oils, and also clinical reports both of success and of failure in its therapeutic use. Heubner, Salge, Baginsky, Biedert and Fishl found it of no use in rickets. Vierordt, Stoltzner and Finkelstein mantained a vigorous defense of it, although they emphasized the importance of combining it with phosphorous. From 1908 to 1912, Schabad published the much-discussed matabolism experiments, which indicated a specific effect in rickets not produced by other oils. He pointed out certain pitfalls in relation to latent period and dosage. In 1910, Rosenstern(12) wrote: "Cod liver oil is in the forefront of children's remedies. For long it has been struggling against the scepticism of exact science." He reported cures in cases of early rickets and tetany with cod liver oil alone, and considered the effect specific. Czerny,(13) in 1912, asserted most positiviely that its only effect was due to easily assimilated fat. No definite reports of its failure in actual use appeared in the literature in this country or in England. However, pharmacologists and chemists were convincedthat its action was in no way specific, and certain noted pediatricians, whose influence was widespread, taught that it was of no particular value. In the 1901 edition of Rotch's(14)"Pediatrics" he says: The treatment of rachitis is essentially dietetic and hygienic. The infants should be kept in the open air as much as possible, and should live in rooms accessible to sunlight. There does not seem to be any drug which produces specific effect upon the osseous chnages which take place in rachitis. Phosphorus is considered by some observers to be a valuable adjunct in the general dietetic and hygienic treatment, but, according to our experience at the Children's Hospital, it has not proved to be of any special benefit. He makes no mention of cod liver oil. Still,(15) in his textbook, in 1912, notes the use of cod liver oil and give the dosage, and adds: There seems to be no specific virtue in cod liver oil, any other oil will do equally well, provided it can be taken without disturbing digestion or causing nausea by its taste. At one time we used, at the Children's Hospital, Great Ormond Street, olive oil and pilchard oil and cotton seed oil, made into as palatable an emulsion as possible, and these seemed to be as useful as cod liver oil, except that they were more apt to cause nausea or digestive disturbance. Henoch, 1882;(16) Meiggs and Pepper, 1886;(17) Starr, 1894;(18) Holt, 1896;(19) Kerley, 1907,(21) in their general textbooks, advised the use of cod liver oil, and many physicians were impressed with its obvious benefit in rickets and continued its use. Recently, well controlled experiments both in the rat and in the human infant have demonstrated beyond criticism the efficacy of cod liver oil in the cure and prevention of rickets, and attention may now be directed to the mechanism which brings about this effect.
CodPics...Vitamin D3 http://www.axxora.com/files/formula/LKT-C0145.gifhttp://www.photomed.de/uploads/pics/vitamin_d3_01.jpghttp://www.mmaonline.net/Publications/MNMed2005/November/Images/sun.gifhttp://www.teridanielsbooks.com/States/Florida/children,%20beach,%20sand,.jpg
http://www.infonet.st-johns.nf.ca/green/acrayola.jpgAugust 1998: The Portuguese tall ship CREOULA returns to St. John's harbour. The CREOULA, a Portuguese Navy training vessel, sailed from Lisbon (Lisboa) to St. John's to commemorate Portugal's cod fishery heritage. The Creoula made 37 voyages to the Grand Banks. The Last was in 1973. The Creoula could carry about 12,800 quintals of "Green Cod" (about 800 tonnes) together with about 60 tonnes of cod liver oil. PHOTO BY H. PINSENT 1998.from "Terra Nova Greens": http://www.infonet.st-johns.nf.ca/green/historicvessels.html
"Fishy news" from Norway:Fish oils EPA & DHA (not Vitamin A & D!)are better absorbed in the natural way.Enhanced incorporation of n-3 fatty acids from fish compared with fish oils.Elvevoll EO, Barstad H, Breimo ES, Brox J, Eilertsen KE, Lund T, Olsen JO, Osterud B. Norwegian College of Fishery Science, Department of Marine Biotechnology, University of Tromso, Norway. edel.elvevoll@nfh.uit.noThis work was undertaken to study the impact of the source of n-3 FA(Fat Acids) on their incorporation in serum, on blood lipid composition, and on cellular activation. A clinical trial comprising 71 volunteers, divided into five groups, was performed. Three groups were given 400 g smoked salmon (n = 14), cooked salmon (n = 15), or cooked cod (n = 13) per week for 8 wk. A fourth group was given 15 mL/d of cod liver oil (CLO) (n = 15), and a fifth group served as control (n = 14) without supplementation. The serum content of EPA and DHA before and after intervention revealed a higher rise in EPA and DHA in the cooked salmon group (129% rise in EPA and 45% rise in DHA) as compared with CLO (106 and 25%, respectively) despite an intake of EPA and DHA in the CLO group of 3.0 g/d compared with 1.2 g/d in the cooked salmon group. No significant changes were observed in blood lipids, fibrinogen, fibrinolysis, or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tissue factor (TF) activity, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin-8 (IL-8), leukotriene B4 (LTB4), and thromboxane B2 (TxB2) in whole blood. EPA and DHA were negatively correlated with LPS-induced TNFalpha, IL-8, LTB4, TxB2, and TF in whole blood. In conclusion, fish consumption is more effective in increasing serum EPA and DHA than supplementing the diet with fish oil. Since the n-3 FA are predominantly in TAG in fish as well as CLO, it is suggested that the larger uptake from fish than CLO is due to differences in physiochemical structure of the lipids.Lipids. 2006 Dec;41(12):1109-14.http://www.visitscandinavia.or.jp/Gallery/norway/Norway_Aurora%20Tromso%20town.jpg