The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
That CAN'T be true!
"liber al" / "book of the law" puzzle
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
"liber al" / "book of the law" puzzle
1 Replies
9503 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kranwan
(OP)
First timers
5
Activity:
0%
"liber al" / "book of the law" puzzle
«
on:
09/07/2015 20:29:23 »
does anyone know this puzzle and has seen a solution like the following before: [content removed]
i will not try defend the puzzles ideological background nor comment on aleister crowley himself, i'd like to treat it AS IF IT WERE an actual (mathematical) puzzle. the original riddle as found in the "liber al vel legis" (or "book of the law"), respectively as traditionally multiplied (4638ABK24ALGMOR3YX2489RPSTOVAL) is "translated" into letters only, then into numbers only. i think the most important step is this "double conversion". it brings up the question of how to treat the number 24 (as either the letter X or the letters B and D), and then the question of how to reunite the number- and letter part which are split at first.
this is mostly (if not only) for people who know the puzzle already. again, this is the "puzzle" i'm talking about: 4638ABK24ALGMOR3YX2489RPSTOVAL
«
Last Edit: 21/03/2016 08:29:16 by kranwan
»
Logged
Beer w/Straw
Jr. Member
12
Activity:
0%
Transcendental Ignorance!
Re: "liber al" / "book of the law" puzzle - ever seen this before?
«
Reply #1 on:
11/07/2015 12:00:50 »
If you are genuinely interested in the gematria/numerology stuff, maybe you could change your approach ie your pictures. Also, this is the third science/math forum you've posted on so why should expect a different response this time either? As I've seen suggested, you should find a different audience.
«
Last Edit: 11/07/2015 12:08:22 by Beer w/Straw
»
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...