0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Please learn what you are talking about before making such grandiose and demonstrably wrong claims about the universe.Energy, while a tricky subject to grasp completely, is easily defined, predicted, measured and accounted for. There are many excellent resources that give definitions, explanations, derivations, theory and history of the subject. Use the internet for 60 seconds, and you can probably find 3 good leads.A few tips:1) energy could not possibly be a point, or anything pointlike.2) learn about positive and negative charge, you keep misusing them and confusing everyone including yourself3) Avoid big words until you've learned the little ones. Statements like this are meaningless: "The Quanta in space has no net charge and only when the Quanta flow becomes pressured by an opposing force, does a net charge occur , a bottlenecking of Quanta, that creates a temporal variable synchronisation of the constant which we know as spectral content."
In the unobservable of the Universe, remains unanswered questions of the things we can not visual observe, what is energy?
what is the nature of light?
what is the gravity mechanism?
What if we could define energy itself? This would lead to new understandings.
What is energy?
Energy is a specific unified point in space ...
, a point of existence where there is something of a positive nature rather than something of negative.
Could we perceive Quanta , was pure energy itself, how would we ever know?
http://physics.info/light/
Light can not be seen by humans it can be detected by a humans remote sensors that is interpreted by the brain as light.
Only light of a spectral frequency can you observe,
Humans can see the entire range of light waves. When we see something that's red such as the spot that a He-Ne laser produces on a white wall we're seeing pure red.
the box - When you have some serious questions to ask me other than silly word games let me know. What you posted in that last post isn't worth the effort to respond to them. Please get serious and stop with the word games. Start by reading a physics text. Not having time is not a valid excuse since you have time to post in forums which you could better use that time in a real study of physics, after which you'll be able to come back with serious questions and no more word games and playing with semantics. I'm real tired of it and won't ever comment on that kind of nonsense.
Energy or photons move at the speed of light, which is the same in all references, however photons also have wavelength and frequency which can be different in different references. We see red shifted energy from distance galaxies, which never stops moving at the speed of light. This tells me that energy has two legs or aspects, one leg is always connected to a speed of light reference, and the other leg is connected to inertial reference. Say you were to sit on a photon to view the universe from its speed of light reference. The inertial universe would appear to be a point in size according to special relativity. What that means is any wavelength less than infinite would be smaller than your point reference and therefore cannot be seen, since less than a point cannot exist by definition. The speed of light is color blind. If we could slow from the speed of light reference, the universe will appear to expand from the point-instant into finite size. Finite size perception allows more wavelengths to appear, albeit, very large wavelengths at first. As we slow more and more and the universe appears to be getting larger and larger, all wavelengths can be seen. If we keep one foot planted at C and allow the other leg to slow from C to a critical point, we get the bets of both world; energy.
The sky is blue because we are being pulled towards the sun, the compression we see of the light is a blue wave, the magnetic field , electrons, repelling the suns magnetic field , electrons. When the sun angles towards the earth at specific times we see a red sky in the morning or at night, this is because the light is being stretched and at this point the earth is trying to pull away from the sun, releasing the radiation pressure allowing the light flow to flow more freely.
Energy or photons move at the speed of light, ...
We see red shifted energy from distance galaxies, ...
Say you were to sit on a photon to view the universe from its speed of light reference.
That is incorrect. You see only red shifted photons which have energy.
Quote from: PmbPhy on 25/09/2015 15:56:19That is incorrect. You see only red shifted photons which have energy.Incorrect, the Quanta is energy, you see the quanta flow being stretched, the differential is observable to the constant of clarity. Quanta has no net charge when in constant flow. ''Energy is an abstract quantity which is merely a bookkeeping device''Energy is Quanta, Quanta is passed between all matter, force is a passing of quanta.
Quote from: Thebox on 25/09/2015 16:18:01Quote from: PmbPhy on 25/09/2015 15:56:19That is incorrect. You see only red shifted photons which have energy.Incorrect, the Quanta is energy, you see the quanta flow being stretched, the differential is observable to the constant of clarity. Quanta has no net charge when in constant flow. ''Energy is an abstract quantity which is merely a bookkeeping device''Energy is Quanta, Quanta is passed between all matter, force is a passing of quanta.Wrong!! You're confusing the fact that the energy of subatomic particles are quantized in some instances with all energy being defined as "quanta" which is quite wrong. Light quanta, i.e. photons, have a quantized amount of energy. That energy has a specific amount which depends on the wavelength of the photon but can take on any value depending on what the wavelength is. If an electron is moving in an electric field where there is a relative minimum, i.e. the second derivative is positive in a specific region, then the energy of the electron is quantized when the energy is less than a particular value. E.g. the energy of an electron in an atom is quantized when the energy is negative and not quantized when its no longer in the potential, i.e. when its free.However, that said, energy itself is not "quanta." In quantum mechanics there are times when the energy comes in discrete amounts. In classical mechanics that's not true. The kinetic energy of an object is not quantized. Therefore you can't claim that energy "is" quanta. That's a very false assumption.I've already described energy to you. Obviously you didn't get it the first time around. You need to read this http://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/mech/what_is_energy.htm again. This time read it more carefully.