0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Well, if he thinks there is only now, always now and forever now, yes...
and you must also agree that a change in a rate of any clock does not change or affect time.
Incorrect, science says clocks are time, they insist on a time dilation by a change in rate of the clock.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/02/2016 19:50:48Incorrect, science says clocks are time, they insist on a time dilation by a change in rate of the clock. No. Nobody "insists" on it, we measure it. And to nobody's surprise but yours, the result is exactly as Einstein predicted.
"it is the change in the passage of TIME that changes the clock."
You do not measure anything, you have things you use to say a time, you do not and can not measure time.
Things that can be measured generally have a dimension, physical shape and structure.
You might as well as say there is a god and give up.
Time is in comparison to a God,
they do not physically exist either, so if you all insist time exists then you insist god exists and religion is correct and science is wrong.
Things that can be measured generally have a dimension,
Thebox, please read the following before you continue. Otherwise you will make no progress in your efforts to converse with the scientific community.http://www.schoolphysics.co.uk/age16-19/General/text/Dimensions_/index.htmlI personally would like to see you progress. I hope you don't let me down.
Time is change.
Some changes are cyclical. Is a cycle a piece of time? Or is it a measure of time? Let's not get all upset over such a trivial question.
Quote from: Thebox on 05/02/2016 08:53:13Things that can be measured generally have a dimension, Time is a dimension. Like mass and length. That is set out in "Physics 101", without which you will never understand what the rest of us are takling about.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 05/02/2016 17:19:11Thebox, please read the following before you continue. Otherwise you will make no progress in your efforts to converse with the scientific community.http://www.schoolphysics.co.uk/age16-19/General/text/Dimensions_/index.htmlI personally would like to see you progress. I hope you don't let me down.I was also willing and eager to see some development in this member but after multiple attempts and frequent efforts aimed at that goal, I've become very pessimistic about any success concerning that eventuality. If I were you Jeff, I wouldn't be holding my breath.
Quote from: Thebox on 05/02/2016 08:53:13You do not measure anything, you have things you use to say a time, you do not and can not measure time. Wrong.................Quote from: TheboxThings that can be measured generally have a dimension, physical shape and structure. Time is the fourth dimension................Quote from: Thebox You might as well as say there is a god and give up. What? Abandon all the scientific information we have collected over the years just because you say so??? "NOT" Quote from: TheboxTime is in comparison to a God, By who's definition??Quote from: Thebox they do not physically exist either, so if you all insist time exists then you insist god exists and religion is correct and science is wrong.No one here has said anything about religion with one exception of course, that being yourself. And BTW, it has always been you that has insisted that science is wrong Mr. Box.