Onesimpleprinciple

  • 113 Replies
  • 56297 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« on: 21/02/2007 11:58:28 »
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all

I can explain everything with pressure change, so i dont need gravity at all.

Lets take a look this videoclips.

Dont worry about language, we have english text in video.














This video is old one. We need to make new one.

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/?lang=1&noflt=1&haku=%5Bvideo%3A


One simple principle


According to this simple principle (the Savonian theory) the universe consists of only energy and space. Energy is the one and the same energy that has the ability to wrap up into denser space and the ability to open up into less dense energy in space, which does not expand or bend. You can perform an experiment by trying, how a single concentration of energy (you, in this case) can wrap up into smaller space (foetal position), in which less energy is released from you. Then you can try to think how the energy in the core of an atom is always denser and denser, depending on how close the energy is to the center of a separate energy concentration.

Does history repeat itself? People, who believed that the earth was the centre of universe, thought erroneously that the earth stays in its own place and all the celestial objects circle us. Modern theories suggest that all visible objects of the universe mostly stay in a static area in space, which expands in such way that the universe does not expand outwards into existing space. This model requires an additional space dimension, which is rather impossible for people to understand.


The Big Bang
According to the Big Bang theory, in the beginning there was only a very dense concentration of energy and space was created inside this concentration in a big explosion. But what if all this energy begun to open up outwards to a space that already existed?

We do not have to assume that all energy in that concentration opened up evenly. According to my theory, all energy in that concentration begun to push itself away from the center of the concentration while expanding at the same time. When all the energy tried to expand into every direction, it caused an enourmous pressure towards the center, and that pressure kept this energy hot and dense. The farther the energy traveled, the faster it could expand, and thus the faster the movement became.

Let us assume that there was another similar concentration in space, and the energies from these two concentrations collided. As a result, these energies from the two sources no longer had unlimited space to expand into, so instead they were squeezed into separate, smaller concentrations, which then started releasing their own energy waves.

This can explain how smaller particles and separate concentrations were created from two larger concentrations of energy as they were expanding three-dimensionally.

Savor

:);):)
« Last Edit: 29/11/2007 07:47:35 by JukriS »

*

Offline daveshorts

  • Moderator
  • Neilep Level Member
  • *****
  • 2582
  • Physics, Experiments
    • View Profile
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #1 on: 21/02/2007 12:43:08 »
Perculiarly my Finnish is limited to tooth, lamb, and rhubarb pie, which does not qualify me to read your site. However you appear to be trying to redefine the whole of physics in different terms. In which case you have a lot of immensely accurate observations to explain, and the lack of maths worries me.

ps I will move this thread to new theories, as it is one.

*

Offline Mr Andrew

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 206
  • God was primitive man's attempt at Physics.
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #2 on: 22/02/2007 23:47:41 »
It seems to me that, in your videos, you're saying that all energy concentrations emit energy waves.  These energy waves repel each other, explaining the expansion of the universe.  You then go on to say that these energy waves cancel each other out and create a pressure differential (gravity).  How can the energy waves repel each other AND cancel each other out?  If energy repeled itself, wouldn't these hypothetical energy concentrations be unstable?  You seem to contradict yourself quite a lot...at least in the videos.
--Life is the greatest experiment that any person will ever conduct.  It should be treated with the same scientific method as any other experiment.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #3 on: 23/02/2007 07:11:13 »
Most important video is protons and neutrons = protonit ja neutronit.

How meteor/asteroids burning in ear?

Savor

:);):)

*

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 3345
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #4 on: 23/02/2007 18:02:14 »
This is total rubbish and has no sensible relationship with the most simple physical observations

It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!

*

paul.fr

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #5 on: 23/02/2007 18:38:31 »

It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!

Oh, come on. Are you seriously saying that the moon is not made of green cheese?

*

jolly

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #6 on: 24/02/2007 16:59:59 »
 deleted as inapproprate
« Last Edit: 06/03/2007 00:58:34 by jolly »

*

paul.fr

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #7 on: 24/02/2007 17:25:39 »

paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly   

Hello Mr/s Jolly. I found it amusing, and somewhat reflective of the society we live in. Just for you i have changed it.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #8 on: 24/02/2007 19:24:10 »
there is gravity and ther isnt it depends where in the universe you are, there certainly is on the earth, or are you saying that you want to rename it somthing else? what ever you call that force it still exsists. as we and you all feel it. or are you saying that its percevied so it could be an illusion? which would explain levatation. but i think it dose exist. as if it was just percieved some of us would float.



If you are in spaceships who moving faster and faster, you have same gravity what we have here in earth. Thats you feeling, you dont feel about some power, who keeping you here.

Savor

:);):)

paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly   

*

paul.fr

  • Guest
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #9 on: 27/02/2007 22:13:47 »
  your saying is silly   
not as sill as 'boys dreul' which they do not. They may drool, or even druel. Which is the verb of drool.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #10 on: 09/03/2007 16:56:37 »
Protons and Neutrons

According to my theory protons and neutrons are similar 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy and they unroll energywaves which have the nature of even smaller 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy. This way protons and neutrons (which we could call with a mutual name) get more energy from the samekind of concentrations nearby and that causet that the protons and neutrons explode / uproll energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other with the same respect as they expand.

From the middle of the “surface” towards the centre, the energy is four times denser wrapped and from this point towards the middle of the centre even more four times denser wrapped energy. Therefore in an area which has the same size has 16 times more energy than on the “surface” of the consentration. This distance can be divided in halves in endless times and that makes us ask if there is enormeous amount of dense wrapped energy in the centre of energyconsentration.

In the atom cords of heavy substances these consentrations exist more side by side. Consentrations can push themselves away from each other faster than they expand rarely and then there is a question about  atoms going halves. The atoms of heavy substances go halves faster because their centres have more consentrations, which burn each others energy faster and because of that from the cords of heavy atoms it opens up denser energywaves than from the light atomcords. That is not enough because by reason of 3-dimentional expansion it must all the time open up more and more energy from the cords of heavy substances in relation to the atomcords of light substances so that these heavy substances would expand observably as fast as the light substances. So in principle the energy of heavy substances expands faster ja because of that all the substances as we see expand with a increasing speed at the same as they preserve their form and capasity from the point of humans view for a reasonably long periods.

With the help of the videoclip attached, I will show you how the protons and neutrons have always expanded with an increasing speed. It may be difficult for you to accept this theory even though itīs understandable. If I am right about my theory, please remember that people about 500 years ago were in a same situation when Copernicus and Galilei overturned our opinions about the universe. The sun seemed to circle us, but it doesnīt! The objects that drop seem to be moving towards the centre of  earth, but according to this new theory they also push themselves away from the centre of earth slower than the surface of the earth and then they only seem to move towards the centre of earth while dropping towards the surface of the earth.

Savor

:);):)

*

Offline thebrain13

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 442
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #11 on: 19/10/2007 05:45:06 »
Do you think soul surfer realizes how funny he is?

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #12 on: 19/10/2007 19:36:29 »
Age of globe*
If I am right about my theory, how many times has the globe circulated the sun? It might very well be so, that once the planets have pushed themselves away from the sun much more directly.  Not until then when there has become
energywaves from other galaxies has the orbit of each planet bended more curved and settled to the stable speed it has now. So the atoms of the globe have vibrated for 4,5 billion years, but if the globe once didīt circulate the sun nearly as fast as it nowadays does, we can ask how old the globe really is? If the age is counted so that one year is one circuit, so how old is the globe then?

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #13 on: 19/10/2007 19:37:31 »
Cold fusion*
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies donīt presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.

As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms. A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom donīt push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.

The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves. This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.

It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #14 on: 19/10/2007 19:38:23 »
Quasars*
Quasi-stellar objects (QSO)


Is it possible that the visible universe moves in a moment entirely away from the space where it locates now, so that everything expand / explode at the same time and become for example to times bigger than they are now?

Are the galaxies photons of a substance that is in one size larger scale?

Are the quasi-stellar objects formed at the same time when the giant energyconcentrations of the galaxycentres pass by the similar concentrations that come against nearby?

Maybe the whole visible univese moved for the first seven billion years inside a substance that was one scale larger.

Also the photons give way to the photons coming against by waves that open up by themselves. The nearer the passing happens the more the opening energy from the energy concentration comimng against makes the concentration to explode energy in frontsides and with this energy they pass to another direction.

Is the corona of the sun formed when the energybudles coming against the sun pass nearby the energybudles opening up from the sun? Or does there happen straight smashes?


Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #15 on: 19/10/2007 19:38:59 »
Stars *
According to my idea, stars are formed out of gigantic, three-dimensionally expanding energy concentrations in the centres of galaxies, which release energy waves with an atomic nature. Energy waves that open up contain expanding quarks.

A sufficient energy pulse from outside sweeps with it the energy waves released by the quarks, which would otherwise push other quarks away in a relation analogous to their expansion. Now, the quarks start to expand and come close to each other in a way similar to cold fusion, forming what is called protons and neutrons, which are similar expanding energy concentrations releasing energy waves.

This explains one of the mysteries in modern physics, that is, how it is possible that new stars still come into existence near the gigantic black holes in galaxy centres. If the black holes indeed had a force that the calculations show, that attractive force ought to prevent the formation of new stars. My idea, in turn, could predict the new stars in the vicinity of the huge black holes in galaxy centres.



Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline Ophiolite

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 718
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #16 on: 22/10/2007 14:45:50 »
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all
I am confident you are correct. There is no gravity: the Earth sucks.
Observe; collate; conjecture; analyse; hypothesise; test; validate; theorise. Repeat until complete.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #17 on: 23/10/2007 11:26:03 »
The Lightnings

Lightnings exist in a certain weather, when there is a certain kind of pressure variation in atmosphere. At first the energy rapidly explodes from down to up towards a less dense area and this dense energypulse cleans the energy opening from the atomcores with the energypulse up towards a less dense area.

The energybundles of this energic pulse open energy itself forwards. Now one energybundle in this energyfront hits to some atonscore higher up, before the actual energypulse reaches there. It makes really a lot of energy to explode from there. This energy is now directed also to an area that has the least dense energy and locates now down, from where the front of the energypulse (the pilotwave) has cleaned energy upwards with it.This is why the actual lightning strikes straight towards the energypulse that has opened up from downwards.

Look also ”the Tsunami 2004” subject in Geology section.

Many blue jets exist in upper atmosphere and they release really a lot of energy upwards like fans. Is this a mystery to a modern technology?

Let us think, that towards the globe there comes energywaves from space and the energic energybundles of these energywaves meet energybundles that open up from the globe. The energybundles coming from the globe clean with them away from the globe the energywaves that come from energybundles coming towards the globe. Now the energybundles coming towards the globe donīt push themselves separate from each other at the same relation
as they expand. This is how they reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The energybundles coming towards the globe unite themselves to more energic energybundles. At the same time they themselves clean with them the energywaves opening up from the upper atmospheres atomcores. At some point one energybundle in that energypulse hits to some three-dimentionally expanding centre of energyconcentration that locates in atomcore of atmosphere.

This makes a lot of energy to explode from that towards a less dence area up above from where the energypulse itself has just cleaned energy with it towards the globe.  During the movement of energypulse coming towards the globe, those atomcores from which the energypulse cleaned energy with the pulse, have had time to push themselves away from the centre of the globe so that now the strongly exploding energy can spread powerfully upwards as a fan.


Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #18 on: 23/10/2007 11:26:44 »
Tornados*
There are lots of researches about tornados, but this phenomen is still not quite understood.

Often lightnings belong to the birth of tornado. Let us think how the energy of a lightning cleans up the energy opening up from the atomcores of atmosphere with it and the atomcores of that area donīt push themselves away. The atoms outside this area continue pushing themselves away from each other and this is how the atomcores in target area of a lightning push themselves close to each other. This is how a gas statue developes. After that the atom cores start to push themselves forcefully away from each other. The atoms of the statue donīt have the power to push each other towards a less dence area, that is to say upwards so that the statue could stay straight. It twistes itself to a tornado, and its atoms / molecules capture with them the molecules of the atmosphere alongside. This is how masses of air begin to flow towards the tornado on account of variation of pressure.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #19 on: 23/10/2007 11:27:24 »
High tide *
The energybundles coming from the moon burn out approximately in a four degree sea storey increasing this way the energy/thickness of energywaves opening up from atomcores. This way the waves are able to push away more
efficient these expanding atomcores of this storey. That causes perceptible thermal expansion and tide phenomen. When the globe has swinged around its axle a quarter this same storey has got colder to a four degree and yet after another swing of quarter that storey gets golder to under four degrees
and expands again faster than other substaces. This causes a new tide.

Water is such an extraordinary substance, that it expands while getting colder to under four degrees. This idea of mine is able to explain that the energywaves opening up from the molecules of water bend more efficient
towards the centre of watermolecules nearby in a water that is under four degrees cold. This way these molecules push each other away more efficient and expand three-dimentionally at the same time.

Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #20 on: 24/10/2007 08:53:41 »
The tracklevel of planets*
Planets always try to push themselves away from their stars to a area, where they get the least thick energy from the star. And every planet in a way float in an energysea opening from the star (the same way as the fishing float does) plumping around its axle depending which side of the planet is thicker. The thicker side of the planet is plumping down towards the sun (= the "the bottom of the sea).

Also the galaxy is like a plate, this way for example towards the sun there comes more energywaves from other stars in equator level of sun than from the direction of the sunpoles. The sun makes the energywaves of other stars to bend. When the stars pass the sun above, they bend and go gross with the energywaves that have passed the sun beneath. These waves also bend. That is why there is in a way an energyfurrow in a energysea coming from the sun and all the planets take their places according how thick the planets themselves are. This is compared to a thing how the water take its place in a river at the bottom of a valley or a pass.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #21 on: 24/10/2007 22:04:49 »
Acceleration +
Why dont we on the globe orbit observe the acceleration away from the Globe?

Same time we also dont observe the acceleration away from the Sun.

The neutrinos coming from the Sun expand three dimensionally and move their kinetic energy to the atomic cores.

Also same kind of energy coming from the Globe expand three dimensionally and move their kinetic energy to the atomic cores of the spaceport on the Globes orbit seperately.

When we move away from the surface of the Globe, we can see more of it.
There will also be more opening energy bunches which expand and move their kinetic energy to other materials on the Globe orbit.

The farer away off Globe s surface we go the more energy can come towards us the outskirts of the Globe. And the outer pressure that push us towards the Globe s surface will decrease relatively.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #22 on: 24/10/2007 22:05:25 »
Ice age*
Let us think, that more energy than normally comes towards the sun and this makes the sun open up more energy than usually. Then towards the globe there comes more energy than usually and this causes that the globe begins to push itself away from the sun in a curved orbit faster than normally. The seas and the lakes vaporize more humidity to atmosphere than normally. In some point there wounīt come any more energy towards the sun than normally and
then also there wounīt open up energy from the sun more than usually.

Then the globe is pushing itself further away from the sun and thatīs why the temperature of the globe drops rapidly a lot. Then the humidity in the atmosphere freezes and this is how continents become covered with ice. This surface does not totally melt when the globe sinks "deeper" than normally to the energysea that opens up from the sun. When the energywaves coming from the sun have made the globe rise over the "seasurface" in the energysea opening up from the sun, the seas vaporize again strongly and freeze again over the ice cover at the continents.

For some time the movement orbit of the three-dimentionally expanding globe swings more than usually at the same time as the expanding globe pushes itself away from the three-dimentionally expanding sun.

During some time this swinging reduces and the ice begins to melt.

Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #23 on: 25/10/2007 16:30:47 »
The Planets

The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.

A new species of the Planets

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/2006/pr200624.html

The astronomers have located several bizarre light gasplanets.

They move close to their star and circulate around it in 4-5 days.

According to my theory the gasplanets of the solar system push themselves away from the sun further than the rock planets, because the gas planets are lighter.

Why do these even more lighter planets circulate around their stars so close?

Why do the Pioneer sounders have an unexplainable acceleration towards the sun?

According to my theory the atoms of the planets expand and open up energywaves. These waves make the neutrinos to explode their energy towards the atomcores of the planets. This is how a neutrino transfers its kinetic energy.

At some point the atoms of gasplanets have expanded for so long time, that the energywaves opening up from them are able to push the atomcore nextby easily further. Now between the atomcores there doesnīt move relatively such dense energywaves as earlier.

Neutrino that moves between the atomcores of such a light gasplanet donīt affect with dence energy. That is why neutrino doesīt explode its energy as much towards that light planets atomcores.

Now the surface of expanding star begins to reach for expanding gasplanet relatively. The gasplanet approaches the star without moving towards it. Then it settles down and pushes it away from its star nearby.


Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #24 on: 26/10/2007 13:23:17 »
Saturn*
Do the planets open up more energy from their poles?

That would explain the location of the rings that have been observed around the gasplanets. The material of the rings has found its way to a energyfurrow around the planet and pushes itself away from its expanding planet in that area. This happens also in Uranus case.

This information lets us understand that the gasplanets really do open up more energy from their poles.

http://apod.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061113.html

At least the energy coming from the sun reflects partly out of the planets and because the planets are round, this energy does not go back towards the sun. Also in case of the Uranus this reflecting energy would form its own share of the energyfurrow, because it it really doesnīt reflect from Uranus towards its rings.

Approximately in 30 years distance there is a big strorm observed in Saturn. The maximum amount of sun points appear in 11 years distance. Saturn itself circulates around the sun once in 29,5 years.

I predict that energywaves come from the galaxy centre in approximately 11 years distance. These energywaves have the nature of the quarks. Because the regular storms of Saturn in 30 years distance last just for a little time, I claim that only one out of three strorms is observed from the globe.

These energywaves in the centre of the galaxy maintain also the red spot of the Jupiter and maybe also can explain the spots of Uranus and Jupiter.

The energybundles heading towards the sun burn out so deep inside the sun that the energywaves coming out of them appear in 11 years delay. When the outcoming energysreams are staunched there are only sunspots left.

Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #25 on: 26/10/2007 20:33:37 »
Venus*
Venus rotates around its axle clockwise. The other planets rotate around their axles anti-clockwise. All the planets rotate around the sun anti-clockwise.

Venus is the only planet that has average temperature also at nights in plus degrees, hundres of degrees!

Does the energy that comes from the sun and commits to the Venus open up mostly in mornings of Venus? This would make Venus rotate clockwise around its axle. At the same time Venus would get kinetic energy to a curved orbit, that would take Venus around the sun anti-clockwise.

Suns energy committing to other planets of rock would open up mostly at nights.

The energy of Venus opening up in the mornings is then rotating Venus with downthread in relation to the surface of the energysea opening up from the sun. Does this cause friction that keeps Venus hot?


Jukka Petteri Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline Ophiolite

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 718
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #26 on: 26/10/2007 22:29:32 »
The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.
Then, according to your hypothesis the very dense Mercury should be out somewhere near the orbit of Pluto. How do you account for its present position?
Observe; collate; conjecture; analyse; hypothesise; test; validate; theorise. Repeat until complete.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #27 on: 27/10/2007 20:04:26 »
The heavier substace the planet consists of, the deeper in an energysea opening up from the sun it pushes itself in a curved orbit away from the sun.
Then, according to your hypothesis the very dense Mercury should be out somewhere near the orbit of Pluto. How do you account for its present position?

I dont know how dense or thiny Merkurius really are.

That Energysea bottom is sun skin.

Pluto and other small things outside gasplanets orbit get energywaves from gusplanets and thats why they can moving thats high in that energysea what sun open all a time.


Savorinen

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #28 on: 29/10/2007 13:51:00 »
Sun's corona*
Is it so, that new massive photons coming out of sun are seeds of a substance in a galaxy that is one size smaller? When they come out of the sun, they already are far away from each other and so the so called
Inflation-theory is not necessary.

Quasars, that is to say one size smaller substanceīs intensive optical phenomenons arise in a corona area. The giant black holes in the centre of the new galaxies receive hits from the photons coming towards the sun. Above all from the energywaves that open up from them and have had time to arise stars that are one size smaller substance.

Also the old photon centres that past the sun receive hits to themselves. This is how they explode more of their energy away from the sun and this is how the light bends while passing for example the sun.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #29 on: 30/10/2007 10:39:00 »
Atoms*
New model of an atom

The atomcores expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have
the nature of electron and photon.

Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #30 on: 31/10/2007 06:20:43 »
Molecules*
The molecules are formed of two or several expanding atoms.

The atoms of the molecules open up expanding moleculeīs common energywaves.

In liquids these waves are directed partly beyond the centres of molecules nextby. Between the molecules of the liquid there moves energy for a longer time than in solid substances. This is why often into the molecule of the liquid there comes a larger amount of energy from another direction. With this energy the molecule moves a long journey between the other expanding molecules towards another direction.

Between the molecules of the gases the energy, that comes from the atomcores of the gas, moves even longer journeys. Now there comes relatively even more energy towards the centres of the gas molecules from another direction. That is why the gas molecules are thrown even longer distance between other molecules.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #31 on: 01/11/2007 07:08:52 »
The Interaction / The Black Holes

How do the orbs interact with each other?

They open up energywaves, by which they interact with each other.

The less the orb has exterior surface, the less it interacts with other pieces. Also the density of  energy matters as well.

In a energy concentration there can be a lot of energy, although it would have just a little exterior surface in relation to other orbs.

The denser the energy in an orb is, the less it has exterior surface in relation to the quantity of energy.

The less exterior surface, the slower the energy opens up away from the orb and the less it interacts with other orbs.

The denser the energy of a piece is, the more efficient it stops to itself for example the neutrinos coming from the stars and also the less there comes neutrinos away from the piece.

There wounīt come any neutrinos of the stars from the direction of a black hole, because they stop themselves to a black hole.

However, towards the black hole there move neutrinos all the time and they expand and open up energywaves, while transfering their kinetic energy with them to the orbs.

From the pieces that move near the black hole loose more neutrinos from the side that it away from the black hole. This is how a certain exterior pressure is formed around the black hole.

The closer to the black hole the piece is, the less energybundles come from backside of the black holes and the stronger the exterior pressure is.

When one understands that all the energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves that have the nature of expanding energyconcentration, one can undestand that the black hole does not draw other pieces towards itself. It devours all the other pieces, because it expands and pushes pieces that locate nearby away from itself slower than the pieces and the black hole itsel do expand.

However, some of the black holes are in a way in a diet. They push the gas that locates nearby away from themselves faster than they expand.

Someone may wonder, why the black hole finally begins to reject the pieces that approach the black hole faster than the black hole and the piece themselves expand. It is based on a fact, that allthough the black hole opens up slowly its energy, do these dense energywaves have large energic particles, which also transfer their kinetic energy with energywaves opening up from themselves towards the expanding atomcores of other orbs.

The modern physics does not understand these large energic particles. According to my theory, the speed of these large energic particles has accelerated just because of the fact, that they also do expand and open up energywaves by which they can make the large energic particles in front of them to speed up all the time.Their speed accelerates slower than the speed of the photons. Correspondingly their speed slows down slower than the photons speed when they move for example towards the sun. The speed of a ship accelerates slower than the speed of a boat. The speed of the ship also slows down slower than the speed of a boat.

This way it is easy to understand how the expanding star that pushes itself away from the expanding black hole explodes a lot of its energy towards the black hole. Those opening and expanding energybudles that come from the expanding black hole make the expanding atoms of a star explode faster than normally. It achieves an illusion that the black hole absorbs with some kind of gravitation from a star the mass of a star towards itself.

In fact, the energy coming from the black hole makes the expanding star to explode its energy much stronger than normally.  With this energy that explodes towards the black hole it pushes itself away from the expanding black hole in a curved orbit.



Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #32 on: 02/11/2007 08:41:21 »
Galaxies*
The galaxies rotate like wheels. If there would exist a drafting force, should the galaxies have ten times larger mass than it is at present observed. This is because the farthest stars of galaxies circulate the centre of galaxy so fast. The gravity of observed mass is not able to keep them in their orbits. The stars that circulate the furthest should be thrown away from their tracks.

Although the modern physics does not understand how the gravitation is transfered, it still has found out that galaxies consist of some mystery substace that has this drawing force.

The dark substace is different from the observed substance. Yet it has the the same kind of drawing force as the observed substance has.

No, there is no gravitation!

All the stars of the galaxies have arised from the black holes of the giant centres of the galaxies. They expand three-dimentionally, opening up energywaves that have the nature of atoms. The stars expand and push themselves away from the galaxy centre in a curved orbit in a same relation as they expand.

That is to say that also the furthest stars are thrown away from the centre of the galaxy. The same way as their speed of movement around the galaxy centre lets us suppose. Only this is not observed, because everything expands three-dimentionally in same relation.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #33 on: 02/11/2007 19:15:04 »
The Time*
Slow time

The thicker the energy in a concentarion is, the less it has exterior surface. The slower the time is. The less exterior surface, the slower the concentration opens up energy as waves.

For example the new massive photons have a slower time than the old light photons do.

Accelerating time?

The faster the spacecraft moves, the faster it expands. The more the spacecraft expands, the more it affects energy that comes towards.

The more the the spacecraft affects energy coming towards, the faster the spacecraft expands. The more the spacecraft expands, the more it needs energy to accelerate and so on.

To catch up the speed of light, the craft needs all the energy from the universe. The craft heading straightforward may even catch fire before reaching the speed of light.

What if the craft would be formed like discus and rotates around its axl wildly? Does the energyfield forming around the craft prevent that the energy coming towards can not get to the atomcores? Can the discus shaped craft that turns wildly around its axl catch up easier the speed of light?


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #34 on: 06/11/2007 08:25:56 »
Stopping of light*
The spavecraft and the photon are both made of the same energy than all the other substance/energy is.

The speed of a spacecraft can be accelerated when its fuel/energy is exploded faster than normally. Speed can be slowed down when the spacecraft turns and explodes its energy / fuel more forwards in relation to its movement track.

The energy of a photon has exploded all its way away from three-dimentionally expanding atomcore backwards in relation to its movement track. The speed of a photon slows down in the intermediate agent where sometimes comes more energy to the photon from forwards.

When a train moves forwards, it pushes air in front of it. The air resists the moving of train. Behind the train there is formed a less dense zone that is like a tube. Three-dimentionally expanding molecules of the atmosphere is pushed towards
this zone. They hit in the middle of the tubelike zone and then open up energy from themselves. This energy still does not make the stopped train to move forwards again.

A similar phenomen happens also to the photon. The photon cleans up a less dense area to the space. Energy comes towards that area from every direction and during the hit the releasing energy makes the photon that just stopped to move again.

This news is essentially related to stopping of light and to the fact how the light just after it has stopped continues to move again.

http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/DPP06/Event/52026

Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #35 on: 07/11/2007 17:24:02 »
Jupiter*
Does the Jupiter boil? Do the boiling gasbubbles come out from a same area? Is this an explanation to the red spots of Jupiter?

A continuous energy influx comes from the inside of Jupiter towards the surface of Jupiter. The atoms of this energystream expand faster than the atoms of another area. This could explain the fact that atoms of an
energystream push towards a less dense area faster than the atoms of another area.

Does this energystream get more energy towards itself from the expanding energybundles that come from space? Do they burn out in a area between atomcores of the energystream? This is how they would increase the energy of an energystream with themselves. This would also explain the red spot of Jupiter or in other words the continuous energystream that pushes out from the same area.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #36 on: 12/11/2007 06:41:56 »
Uranus*
The Uranus is so far pecular gas planet that it circulates the sun atilt.

As I understand, Uranus rolls over its axel so that a specific part of it is all the time towards the centre of the galaxy. From time to time one of the poles is towards the sun and after half a round another pole is towards the sun. Applying my theory one could think that the energybudles of energywaves coming from the galaxy centre effect more to Uranus. They move their kinetic energy to Uranus and this way Uranus pushes itself away from the galaxy centre. Sometimes slower than the sun and sometimes faster than the sun. And of course, the energybundles coming out of sun push Uranus away from the sun in the same relation as the sun and Uranus expand.

Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #37 on: 13/11/2007 07:27:04 »
Electricity*
Metals transmit often electricity very well. According to my theory, this is based on a fact that energywaves opening up from the atomcores of metals move staight towards the atomcores nextby and they donīt expand to every direction like sectors.

Continuously expanding energystream from the core of an expanding atom towards another core of expanding atom.

Maybe between the atomcores of metals there are continuously small plasmatornados.

In this way a lot og empty space exists in a area between atomcores of metals. In this area the three-dimentionally expanding energybundles have room to push each other  fast towards a less dense area in a space that does not expand or curve.

The expanding atomcores of the metals have previously expanded close to each other like in cold fusion. After that they donīt have strenght enough to push themselves away from each other faster than they expand / explode.

Now thick energywaves towards the expanding atomcore nextby are sufficient to keep on the energystorm all the time and this way energy flows between the atomcores of metals like an energystream.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #38 on: 14/11/2007 08:13:55 »
Examination*
A test

In physics itīs very important to be able to make repeatable tests, that confirm theories.

I have only one repeatable test that I have developed myself and which confirms my theory.

Most of us can perform this repeatable test my themselves physically and every one of us can perform it in our minds.

I can curl up the energy of my body to a embryo position, when less energy opens up away from me. After that I can unfold (=expand/explode open) to a less dense position when energy opens up / explodes away from me more and faster.

According to my theory I myself also explode all the time and my straightening accelerates opening up. This way this repeatable test proves, that opening / exploding / expanding of energy can very well be accelerating in a space that does not expand.

When this test is repeated with several persons, one can get a better image how for example the continually expanding atoms of the globe make pressure towards the centre of the globe without gravitation.

A captured animal can hide and curl up to a dense position. This way it opens up less energy away from itself and is also more difficult to observe.

The energy of the black holes is energy that is extremely at frequent intervals curled up.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #39 on: 15/11/2007 08:30:51 »
Black holes time is not so fast what stars time is.

Stars "atoms" shaking/vibration more quickly what stars atoms shaking. Even that, black hole have more thiny/hot energy what stars have.

Black hole atoms are more massive what stars atoms are. Also black holes atoms nucleus dont have so much skin what stars atoms nucleus have. Thats why black holes atoms dont open/expand so guickly whta stars atoms expanding. Also black holes expanding "atoms" nucleus dont open so guickly energy waves what stars atoms nucleus open.

Still black hole have more hot energy what stars have.

I meen, stars dont have so hot energy what black holes have. Still stars atoms nucleus vibration/shaking more quickly what balck holes massive "atoms".

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #40 on: 15/11/2007 13:52:56 »
Magnetism*
Also the magnetism can be explained by the variation of the pressure. The energywaves that open up are once again in a key position. The separate three-dimentionally expanding energybundles of the waves and how they have interaction with the energywaves that meet them. And of course, how they have interaction after that with the atomcores of a piece. Or in other words how much or how little do they move their kinetic energy to the pieces.

The particles that rotate wildly round their axles have been observed tohave a magnetic field. The best way to observe a particle rotating wildly round its axle is to observe our galaxies. On the other hand the time is such a relative phenomen, that in our point of view the galaxies do not rotate round their axles.

When we observe the galaxy, we can notice that stars rotate around the galaxy centre. These stars open up energywaves to every direction. This way the stars that push themselves away from the centre of the galaxy, open themselves their energy back towards the galaxy centre.

This is how the stars make each others movement tracks to bend away from the galaxy centre.

The situation is different if the particle does not rotate wildly round its axle.

When a magneto and a iron item dash against each other, we can ask does the magneto draw the iron item towards itself. Or is it so that the  three-dimentional magneto that advaces with accelerating speed does not push away from itself the three-dimentional iron item that also advances with  accelerating speed in same relation as they expand? Now their surfaces crash together because of the variation of pressure, without any drawing force. When we stretch a rubber strip, we can feel the stretching. The atoms of a rubber strip between our fingers push themselves towards a less dense area. The atoms inside the rubber strip are less dense in a area where to the expanding atoms of a rubber strip push each other.

A tension holds because we are pushing ourselves away from the centre of the globe. Our hands diverge at the same relation as they expand. Proportionally our hands donīt draw away from each other. Still the expanding atoms of a rubber strip donīt have time to push one another towards a less dense area so quickly that the tension would fade away from the rubber strip.

We feel also how a iron item strives towards a magneto. This doesnīt base on a fact that the magneto would have a capasity to draw the iron item  towards itself. It bases on a fact that the pressure variates. The variation of the pressure is based on expanding of atomcores, opening up energywaves.

The expanding molecules of air in a spacecraft push each other towards the emptiness of space if the door of a spacecraft is opened. The emptiness does not draw the air out. There does not exist any drawing force.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #41 on: 16/11/2007 17:25:39 »
How energy can be thiny and not so thiny?

How thiny sun energy was 5 billion years ago?

And how thiny is now? Lets remember that sun is open own energy all that time.


I can go more thiny when i take my legs and my hands near my body and then i am little bit warmth what i am, if i open my legs and hands straight.

At least i dont open my energy so quickly far a way from me


Next text what i put here with good english. There i told how you can be near black hole and moving far a way same way what black hole open energy waves expanding energyparticle moving. There you realase more cold what you realase same area near star.

Even black hole energy is more hot/thiny what star energy is.

This is because black hole energyparticle speed dont acceleration so fast what photons speed acceleration.

So, if you moving same way far a way from star, what you moving far a way from black hole, star photons catch up you and then star interactive with you straigt with photons.

If you moving far a way from black hole same way what black hole energy waves moving, then this expanding particle dont hit you straight.

So, then black hole dont interactive with you straight.

Is doing that indirectly with this expanding energyparticle.

This energyparticle expanding and open energy waves, put that energy dont get you so warmth what star photons get straight.

It is easier acceleration small boat speed what it is acceleration big galley/ship speed.

Photons and big energy energyparticle speed acceleration all a time same way what the expanding and opening energy waves, because they pushing themselfs to area where is not so much energy.

Later same thing with better english


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #42 on: 18/11/2007 08:14:05 »
The temperature and the time of the black hole
 
 
Time in black hole advances slower.

Its "atoms" vibrate slower.

They are more massive and they have less exterior surface.

They expand slower and open up their energy as waves slower.

If the heat of the black hole is compared to the heat of a star according to how fast its "atoms" vibrate, the black hole wouldnīt be as hot as the stars are.

Yet the energy of a black hole is thicker / hotter than the energy of the stars.

If you would push yourself away from the expanding black hole in a same relation as the expanding energybundles do, you would feel colder than pushing yourself away from the star in same relation.

Now there would be three-dimentionally expanding energybundles around you and they would be coming from the expanding black hole.The energywaves from these energybundles around you would  not warm you up as much as the expanding energybundles opening up from the stars would when they hit you.

So, if you would push yourself away from the star in a same relation as you push yourself away from the black hole, the photons of a star would reach you.

So the black hole would effect you indirectly with the opening energywaves of the energybundles that open up from the black hole . The star would effect you directly  with the energywaves that open up from the star.

The speed of the photons accelerates easier than the speed of the large-energic particles.

The expanding energybundles that push themselves away from the expanding energy concentration make each others speed to accelerate towards a less dense area with the energywaves that open up from themselves.

Itīs much more easier to accelerate the speed of a small boat than of a massive ship.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #43 on: 19/11/2007 12:23:21 »
How about when the energybundles opening up from the magneto and from the iron item have interaction with each other so that when they fall inside the object nextby (iron item / magneto), they are driven nearby some atomcore of a object and swing around it like comets and continue their journey to that very same direction where they came from?

So now they move their kinetic energy towards a object in a way that the expanding atoms of a magneto push each other towards the expanding atoms ofn  iron item and the expanding atoms of an iron item push each other towards the magneto.



With Savor english

Swing around almost half round and continue next atom nucleus. There that energyparticle expanding and pushing that atom that way.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #44 on: 19/11/2007 12:23:49 »
Sounders/Probes


The speed of a sounder accelerates when the sounder passes the planet nearby.

When the sounder approaches the planet, it begins to have more interaction with the planet. The energywaves opening up from the planets energybundles make the atomcores of a sounder to explode their energy more. Now these waves make the energybundles coming from the planet explode their energy more towards the atomcores of a sounder ect.

After passing by more and more energy comes from the atomcores of a sounder towards the energybundles coming from the planet and this is how they explode their energy more towards the sounders atomcores.

So now they transfer their kinetic energy more to the sounder.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #45 on: 21/11/2007 06:58:49 »
How probes/sounders get more moving energy, when they going near planet.

Planet open massive energyparticle who dont have a lot of skin. So, this energyparticle dont interactive with probes atoms nucleus so much what old energyparticle, who coming from space. That why this energyparticle who coming from space, pushing probes and then that probes orbit change same way what panet skin.

When probes coming near planet, probes atoms nucleus get more and more hits and thats why prpbes nucleus start to open more energy.

That energy hits energyparticle who coming from planet and thats why this massive energyparticle start to expanding more and more energy. So they giving more and more ginetic energy for probes atoms nucleus.


Later with good english.

Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #46 on: 21/11/2007 10:16:02 »
When the sounder goes by the planet, more massive energybudles come towards
the sounder from the planet. These energybundles have less exterior surface
and this way they can have interaction with the atomcores of the sounder
less than the energybundles that come from the space.

The energybundles coming from the space make the orbit of a sounder to bend
in accordance with the planet with the energywaves opening up from
themselves. So they expand and bombard this expanding atomcore with a
radiation that opens up from themselves. This radiation contains very small
exploding energybundles.

Little by little the charge of a sounder changes and more and more energy
begins to open up from its atomcores.

Now the more massive / more energic energybundles coming from the planet get
more and more hits towards themselves and begin this way to transfer more
and more kinetic energy towards the sounder with the help of energywaves
that open up from themselves.This is why the speed of a sounder accelerates
when the sounder moves away from the planet.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)


!!!!!  Magnetism  !!!!!!

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #47 on: 22/11/2007 10:21:21 »
A Riddle from Savolainen*
There are a lot of rollerskaters on a flat floor.

The only equipment they have are the skates and pelota rackets.
These skaters stay still at their positions and the distance between them is
from five to ten meters. A lot of balls come towards them.

They are not allowed to use their feet for example for skating. The only
thing that they can use their feet is to stay in balance and be able to keep
their feet in such a position that the skates point straight ahead.

How can they make themselves to move forward?


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #48 on: 23/11/2007 10:01:29 »
Let us think that outside the galaxy there would come an energy concentration towards the centre of the galaxy. Now there would come a lot of energy from the stars of the outer circle and this way the orbit of this energy concentration would bend according to the centre of the galaxy.

The energy coming from the centre would however start to push it little by little away from the centre of the galaxy and this way it would be thrown after a scant half round away from the galaxy. With a faster speed than it came to the galaxy.

When it now hits the galaxy centre, it would explode strongly and move all its kinetic energy towards it.

If we drop an item into a roundabout, it will be thrown away from the roundabout with speed.



Savorinen Jukka

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #49 on: 24/11/2007 09:54:51 »
There are a lot of rollerskaters on a flat floor.

The only equipment they have are the skates and a safety clothing.
These skaters stay still at their positions and the distance between them is
from five to ten meters. A lot of exploding handgrenades come towards them.

They are not allowed to use their feet for example for skating and also they
are not allowed to explode the handgrenades behind their backs. The only
thing that they can use their feet is to stay in balance and be able to keep
their feet in such a position that the skates point straight ahead.

How do they can move forward?

Exploding handgrenades come from magnets. Skaters are the atom nucleus of the steel item.


Savorinen Jukka

:);):)