[JukriS (OP)]

If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all

I can explain everything with pressure change, so i dont need gravity at all.

Lets take a look this videoclips.

Dont worry about language, we have english text in video.














This video is old one. We need to make new one.

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/?lang=1&noflt=1&haku=%5Bvideo%3A


One simple principle


According to this simple principle (the Savonian theory) the universe consists of only energy and space. Energy is the one and the same energy that has the ability to wrap up into denser space and the ability to open up into less dense energy in space, which does not expand or bend. You can perform an experiment by trying, how a single concentration of energy (you, in this case) can wrap up into smaller space (foetal position), in which less energy is released from you. Then you can try to think how the energy in the core of an atom is always denser and denser, depending on how close the energy is to the center of a separate energy concentration.

Does history repeat itself? People, who believed that the earth was the centre of universe, thought erroneously that the earth stays in its own place and all the celestial objects circle us. Modern theories suggest that all visible objects of the universe mostly stay in a static area in space, which expands in such way that the universe does not expand outwards into existing space. This model requires an additional space dimension, which is rather impossible for people to understand.


The Big Bang
According to the Big Bang theory, in the beginning there was only a very dense concentration of energy and space was created inside this concentration in a big explosion. But what if all this energy begun to open up outwards to a space that already existed?

We do not have to assume that all energy in that concentration opened up evenly. According to my theory, all energy in that concentration begun to push itself away from the center of the concentration while expanding at the same time. When all the energy tried to expand into every direction, it caused an enourmous pressure towards the center, and that pressure kept this energy hot and dense. The farther the energy traveled, the faster it could expand, and thus the faster the movement became.

Let us assume that there was another similar concentration in space, and the energies from these two concentrations collided. As a result, these energies from the two sources no longer had unlimited space to expand into, so instead they were squeezed into separate, smaller concentrations, which then started releasing their own energy waves.

This can explain how smaller particles and separate concentrations were created from two larger concentrations of energy as they were expanding three-dimensionally.

Savor

[daveshorts]

Perculiarly my Finnish is limited to tooth, lamb, and rhubarb pie, which does not qualify me to read your site. However you appear to be trying to redefine the whole of physics in different terms. In which case you have a lot of immensely accurate observations to explain, and the lack of maths worries me.

ps I will move this thread to new theories, as it is one.

[Mr Andrew]

It seems to me that, in your videos, you're saying that all energy concentrations emit energy waves.  These energy waves repel each other, explaining the expansion of the universe.  You then go on to say that these energy waves cancel each other out and create a pressure differential (gravity).  How can the energy waves repel each other AND cancel each other out?  If energy repeled itself, wouldn't these hypothetical energy concentrations be unstable?  You seem to contradict yourself quite a lot...at least in the videos.

[JukriS (OP)]

Most important video is protons and neutrons = protonit ja neutronit.

How meteor/asteroids burning in ear?

Savor

[Soul Surfer]

This is total rubbish and has no sensible relationship with the most simple physical observations

It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!

[paul.fr]

It is about as sensible as assering that the moon is made out of green cheese!

Oh, come on. Are you seriously saying that the moon is not made of green cheese?

[jolly]

 deleted as inapproprate

[paul.fr]

paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly   

Hello Mr/s Jolly. I found it amusing, and somewhat reflective of the society we live in. Just for you i have changed it.

[JukriS (OP)]

there is gravity and ther isnt it depends where in the universe you are, there certainly is on the earth, or are you saying that you want to rename it somthing else? what ever you call that force it still exsists. as we and you all feel it. or are you saying that its percevied so it could be an illusion? which would explain levatation. but i think it dose exist. as if it was just percieved some of us would float.



If you are in spaceships who moving faster and faster, you have same gravity what we have here in earth. Thats you feeling, you dont feel about some power, who keeping you here.

Savor



paul because you want to, thats procrastination really coz tomorrow you'll put it off aswell, really thats sounds to me like somthing you say everyday; to not do somthing. might be wrong through. because you want to is my answer to that. besides you might not be here tomorrow, correct? why assume there is a tomorrow, your saying is silly   

[paul.fr]

  your saying is silly   

not as sill as 'boys dreul' which they do not. They may drool, or even druel. Which is the verb of drool.

[JukriS (OP)]

Protons and Neutrons

According to my theory protons and neutrons are similar 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy and they unroll energywaves which have the nature of even smaller 3-dimentionally expanding concentrations of energy. This way protons and neutrons (which we could call with a mutual name) get more energy from the samekind of concentrations nearby and that causet that the protons and neutrons explode / uproll energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other with the same respect as they expand.

From the middle of the “surface” towards the centre, the energy is four times denser wrapped and from this point towards the middle of the centre even more four times denser wrapped energy. Therefore in an area which has the same size has 16 times more energy than on the “surface” of the consentration. This distance can be divided in halves in endless times and that makes us ask if there is enormeous amount of dense wrapped energy in the centre of energyconsentration.

In the atom cords of heavy substances these consentrations exist more side by side. Consentrations can push themselves away from each other faster than they expand rarely and then there is a question about  atoms going halves. The atoms of heavy substances go halves faster because their centres have more consentrations, which burn each others energy faster and because of that from the cords of heavy atoms it opens up denser energywaves than from the light atomcords. That is not enough because by reason of 3-dimentional expansion it must all the time open up more and more energy from the cords of heavy substances in relation to the atomcords of light substances so that these heavy substances would expand observably as fast as the light substances. So in principle the energy of heavy substances expands faster ja because of that all the substances as we see expand with a increasing speed at the same as they preserve their form and capasity from the point of humans view for a reasonably long periods.

With the help of the videoclip attached, I will show you how the protons and neutrons have always expanded with an increasing speed. It may be difficult for you to accept this theory even though it´s understandable. If I am right about my theory, please remember that people about 500 years ago were in a same situation when Copernicus and Galilei overturned our opinions about the universe. The sun seemed to circle us, but it doesn´t! The objects that drop seem to be moving towards the centre of  earth, but according to this new theory they also push themselves away from the centre of earth slower than the surface of the earth and then they only seem to move towards the centre of earth while dropping towards the surface of the earth.

Savor

[thebrain13]

Do you think soul surfer realizes how funny he is?

[JukriS (OP)]

Age of globe*
If I am right about my theory, how many times has the globe circulated the sun? It might very well be so, that once the planets have pushed themselves away from the sun much more directly.  Not until then when there has become
energywaves from other galaxies has the orbit of each planet bended more curved and settled to the stable speed it has now. So the atoms of the globe have vibrated for 4,5 billion years, but if the globe once did´t circulate the sun nearly as fast as it nowadays does, we can ask how old the globe really is? If the age is counted so that one year is one circuit, so how old is the globe then?

[JukriS (OP)]

Cold fusion*
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.

As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms. A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.

The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves. This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.

It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.

[JukriS (OP)]

Quasars*
Quasi-stellar objects (QSO)


Is it possible that the visible universe moves in a moment entirely away from the space where it locates now, so that everything expand / explode at the same time and become for example to times bigger than they are now?

Are the galaxies photons of a substance that is in one size larger scale?

Are the quasi-stellar objects formed at the same time when the giant energyconcentrations of the galaxycentres pass by the similar concentrations that come against nearby?

Maybe the whole visible univese moved for the first seven billion years inside a substance that was one scale larger.

Also the photons give way to the photons coming against by waves that open up by themselves. The nearer the passing happens the more the opening energy from the energy concentration comimng against makes the concentration to explode energy in frontsides and with this energy they pass to another direction.

Is the corona of the sun formed when the energybudles coming against the sun pass nearby the energybudles opening up from the sun? Or does there happen straight smashes?


Savorinen

[JukriS (OP)]

Stars *
According to my idea, stars are formed out of gigantic, three-dimensionally expanding energy concentrations in the centres of galaxies, which release energy waves with an atomic nature. Energy waves that open up contain expanding quarks.

A sufficient energy pulse from outside sweeps with it the energy waves released by the quarks, which would otherwise push other quarks away in a relation analogous to their expansion. Now, the quarks start to expand and come close to each other in a way similar to cold fusion, forming what is called protons and neutrons, which are similar expanding energy concentrations releasing energy waves.

This explains one of the mysteries in modern physics, that is, how it is possible that new stars still come into existence near the gigantic black holes in galaxy centres. If the black holes indeed had a force that the calculations show, that attractive force ought to prevent the formation of new stars. My idea, in turn, could predict the new stars in the vicinity of the huge black holes in galaxy centres.



Savorinen

[Ophiolite]

If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all

I am confident you are correct. There is no gravity: the Earth sucks.

[JukriS (OP)]

The Lightnings

Lightnings exist in a certain weather, when there is a certain kind of pressure variation in atmosphere. At first the energy rapidly explodes from down to up towards a less dense area and this dense energypulse cleans the energy opening from the atomcores with the energypulse up towards a less dense area.

The energybundles of this energic pulse open energy itself forwards. Now one energybundle in this energyfront hits to some atonscore higher up, before the actual energypulse reaches there. It makes really a lot of energy to explode from there. This energy is now directed also to an area that has the least dense energy and locates now down, from where the front of the energypulse (the pilotwave) has cleaned energy upwards with it.This is why the actual lightning strikes straight towards the energypulse that has opened up from downwards.

Look also ”the Tsunami 2004” subject in Geology section.

Many blue jets exist in upper atmosphere and they release really a lot of energy upwards like fans. Is this a mystery to a modern technology?

Let us think, that towards the globe there comes energywaves from space and the energic energybundles of these energywaves meet energybundles that open up from the globe. The energybundles coming from the globe clean with them away from the globe the energywaves that come from energybundles coming towards the globe. Now the energybundles coming towards the globe don´t push themselves separate from each other at the same relation
as they expand. This is how they reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The energybundles coming towards the globe unite themselves to more energic energybundles. At the same time they themselves clean with them the energywaves opening up from the upper atmospheres atomcores. At some point one energybundle in that energypulse hits to some three-dimentionally expanding centre of energyconcentration that locates in atomcore of atmosphere.

This makes a lot of energy to explode from that towards a less dence area up above from where the energypulse itself has just cleaned energy with it towards the globe.  During the movement of energypulse coming towards the globe, those atomcores from which the energypulse cleaned energy with the pulse, have had time to push themselves away from the centre of the globe so that now the strongly exploding energy can spread powerfully upwards as a fan.


Savorinen

[JukriS (OP)]

Tornados*
There are lots of researches about tornados, but this phenomen is still not quite understood.

Often lightnings belong to the birth of tornado. Let us think how the energy of a lightning cleans up the energy opening up from the atomcores of atmosphere with it and the atomcores of that area don´t push themselves away. The atoms outside this area continue pushing themselves away from each other and this is how the atomcores in target area of a lightning push themselves close to each other. This is how a gas statue developes. After that the atom cores start to push themselves forcefully away from each other. The atoms of the statue don´t have the power to push each other towards a less dence area, that is to say upwards so that the statue could stay straight. It twistes itself to a tornado, and its atoms / molecules capture with them the molecules of the atmosphere alongside. This is how masses of air begin to flow towards the tornado on account of variation of pressure.

[JukriS (OP)]

High tide *
The energybundles coming from the moon burn out approximately in a four degree sea storey increasing this way the energy/thickness of energywaves opening up from atomcores. This way the waves are able to push away more
efficient these expanding atomcores of this storey. That causes perceptible thermal expansion and tide phenomen. When the globe has swinged around its axle a quarter this same storey has got colder to a four degree and yet after another swing of quarter that storey gets golder to under four degrees
and expands again faster than other substaces. This causes a new tide.

Water is such an extraordinary substance, that it expands while getting colder to under four degrees. This idea of mine is able to explain that the energywaves opening up from the molecules of water bend more efficient
towards the centre of watermolecules nearby in a water that is under four degrees cold. This way these molecules push each other away more efficient and expand three-dimentionally at the same time.

Savorinen