The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Onesimpleprinciple
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down

Onesimpleprinciple

  • 113 Replies
  • 80639 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #60 on: 31/01/2008 05:42:25 »
Freezing water*
Let us imagine that the expanding footballs are water molecules which open up expanding table tennis balls, so to say energy as waves in every direction.

When the temperature of the water is over four degrees, the table tennis balls are partly directed beyond the footballs nextby. Then a different amount of energy (=table tennis balls) is directed towards the footballs from different directions.

When the temperature of the water gets down under  four degrees, those table tennis balls are directed all the time less and less beyond the footballs nextby.

This happens because the table tennis balls coming towards twitch with them even smaller balls that open up from the table tennis balls and then these table tennis balls that move to a same direction don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand themselves. Then the footballs expand faster than the table tennis balls coming towards them do spread.

Now a bigger and bigger part of the expanding table tennis balls hit to the expanding football nextby and this way the footballs finally lock out to expand side by side so to say the water freezes.

The more table tennis balls hit directly to the footballs nextby, the more energic the expanding footballs have strenght to push themselves away from each other and this is why the water expands when its temperature gets down under four degrees.

This is when towards the water there doesn´t come so much energy as waves outwards and this way the water molecules can find a well-balanced way to expand side by side.

PS. I describe the water molecules bigger than the energybundles locating in energywaves opening up from them are. Surely for example there exists a lot more energy in the atom cores than there is in electrons, but still the electrons cover the space more than the atom cores do. In so called electrons there exists considerably less dense energy than the energy in atom cores is.

When an electron coming from the atomcore nextby reaches the expanding atomcore, it moves to a denser form. The energywaves opening up from the separate expanding energybundles of the electron burn out when they meet energybundles opening up from the atomcore and then snatch themselves along them away from the atomcore towards which the electron is heading.This way the capacity of the
electron is reduced in a relation to the atomcore and finally the electron itself burns out to the energy
opening up from the atomcore and snatches with it away from the atomcore that it had just headed.

Later from that and from all the other energy coming outwards from the atomcore rises new electrons (according to my theory).
Logged
 



Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #61 on: 17/02/2008 00:36:21 »
Entropy = Expanding stuff

Its meaning stuff who expanding all a time


It is that simple

Peace and love

:);):)
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #62 on: 14/03/2008 22:27:03 »
A logical story
How do the particle coming from the space move their kinetic energy more
towards the atomcores of heavier substaces?

According to my theory this is how it should be, because a hammer drops to
the surface of the moon at the same time as the feather does!

The massiver the atomcore is, the denser energywaves it opens up and the
more it possesses so called electons.

The denser energywaves the expanding atomcore opens up, the more it makes
the expanding particle passing by to explode energy towards itself.

And this is how all the atoms get an equal amount of kinetic energy
(towards that piece in whose neighbourhood the atom locates) from the
expanding particles coming from the space.

When for example the surface of the globe simultaneously pushes itself away
from the centre of the globe, we don´t have to try to explain how the globe
draws the items towards itself. Everything can be explained with the
variation of the pressure. The pressure pushes all the expanding atoms of
the expanding globe away from the centre of the globe and the external
pressure keeps us on the surface of the expanding globe.

So you can forget all about the gravitation and start to wonder how the
universe really works.

The accelerating movement of all the substance away from one certain point
that is really far away from the visible universe, may take the visible
universe in a moment away from the space where it locates now and at the
same time all energy concentrations have had room to expand
three-dimentionally.

The speed of the galaxygroups that move ahead us accelerate faster than our
speed and their speed accelerates more the further they are from us. The
speed of the galaxygroups behind us accelerates in relation to us slower the
further behind us they move. Because of the expanding of the sector the
galaxygroups moving by the side of us draw away faster the further they
locate from us and this is how the common redshift can be explained without
a magical expanding of the space.

When the stars formely arised relatively all at the same time, the new light
did not meet with the light coming towards and this is how the expanding
photons could make their speed to accelerate easily at the same relation as
they expanded three-dimentionally. So the expanding photons also open up
energywaves with which they push eacother away from eachother. The old light
assembles for example when it comes towards the sun, because it meets energy
that comes towards it and makes the photons to explode their energy more
forwards in relation to the motiontrack. Still the common redshift of the
light does not vanish entirely from the old light.

Peace and love!
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #63 on: 03/04/2008 08:03:22 »
For example in the sun the energy is denser than outside the sun. In the
atom cores of the sun the energy is denser tham in an area between the atom
cores. In the protons and in the neutrons the energy is denser than in an
area between them. In the quarks the energy is denser than in an area
between the quarks ect.

When one can understand that all the energyconsentrations do expand  and
emit their energy, one can also understand that there is less dense energy
in the area between the energyconsentrations than in the
energyconsentrations themselves.

There is no reason to doubt that the neutrinos and the photons also do
expand and emit their energy according to the entropy.


Peace and love

:);):)
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #64 on: 14/04/2008 09:43:14 »
No gravity



How does kinetic energuy transfer



No dark matter



Peace and Love
Logged
 



Offline Alan McDougall

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #65 on: 06/07/2008 10:49:39 »
What???????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #66 on: 10/07/2008 19:51:39 »
What ?

It that I am he which invented how macrocosm seriously functioned.

Truly this small truth from all to prove its that we are one and same energy. We him which experiences all matters our by way of and like this you too you are small part we him which experiences all our by way of.

Tätä Onesimpleprinciple thought was initially nice to work and develop! Just now when understand that all energy is quite probably one and same energy, understands that each from the thought hearing gets for itself burden!   If we are one and same energy, so then all which we do to our another, comes with the same done rather like to our self. Also all prayers of all persons are directed to us all. Then is futile accuses some outsider God from all dreadfulness. Then is futile to believe somewhere to the outside God.   Then should believe to his self and then held (?) Tell to all people this small truth from all, whereby knowledge of mankind grows and perhaps by way of that try better time to the all mankind!?!    Are we bad God / Luoja/Älykäs or silly ) designer?   We which Want to forget self ourselves and finally find ourselves?   If, so we are probably notso good mortal? What dreadfulness olemmakaan made self to our self? It is difficult to understand to make war, violence etc.    On the other hand eternity is rather long time. In eternity have time to experience one and another.   If we are one and same energy, so then we he we have at least experienced by way of the mankind, really in the rich colours pleasure and grief!   Everything is difficult to accept and understand!   Just are we he got punishment from each our act at the same time? If each act is directed to us to our self in other words if we he experiences all matters our by way of, so then so is!    If Onesimpleprinciple.com on the sides presented thought is right, so then everyone which slow to common knowledge coming of this thought, slows its time whereby persons around world start to help another each others unselfishly. Time whereby we do matters together to our self in other words to all people! Time whereby person is not predator to another to people!    If you are sure that with these on the sides presented thought pictures wrong mode of action of macrocosm. You can forget its happily. The self find _________________ Olemmeko ourselves? Do they be connected different religions and science already our during?   
      
 Savor




Man/Woman can fall ill so that together in the human body is many different person. If one from the persons to perceive that perhaps they also are all the same person, can this one person continues in the same body their condition other with different persons , without trying tell them truth so that they are all the same person? If different persons besides try to damage another each others even though they have same body, so do hold possible truth seer to become silent and try to live own canting their truth, piittamatta from right truth? Or should he after all try to tell this possible truth to the even one different person?   


Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #67 on: 30/08/2008 17:33:51 »
More than in this proof to it from the expansive Sun radiates expansive neutrino, which move to their kineticenergy Globe to expansive to the atoms' cores. Neutrino so expand and radiate enegy away towards themselves. Produce radiation can't observe. Let think about galaxies to be big neutrino! In the galaxies' centres are colossal particle which is developed themselves round from the energy field's star which radiate extremely small particle in the relationship galaxy centre to colossal energiaconcentration (to big vestige). Galaxies so are big particles which are originated really a long distance visible outside visible universe , as being energy from concentrating on which still to explode and radiates energy waves which have galaxies personality. On his journey galaxies centres explode energyconcentration have interacted themselves avutuvien with the energy waves , which have atom personality. Stars so are originated from the galaxy's centre and they radiate to their energy and so on. At same time in the way to the neutrino born around themselves energy field and to the herring!

Now pioneerproblem gets their explanation so that from Sun come neutrino interact it with the more atoms cores, what further off from Sun they get, because they have time to interact with each other and develop for itself energy field which radiates neutrino business energy to the atoms' cores!

In other words should pioneerprobes of expansive speed then accelerate according to this thought ? Yes, but expansive gas planets the pace picks up more and like this pioneerprobes is observed towards the inexplicable acceleration, Sun!

In other words expansive neutrino don't move to their kineticenergy of fixed to the atoms' cores so much as gaseous ingredients.

Crucial is of course understand it that in the planets' centre is hard pressure and neutrino move to their business energy to the planets' centres powerfully and from there its come across atom from the atom to all to the planets' atoms and also to the planets' moons. Truly moons atoms get business energy from the neutrino also direct!

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=08/08/29/1227239
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #68 on: 23/09/2008 07:38:32 »
The evidence is increasing all the time!

The entire visible universe of energy is coming from one direction and moving in any direction.

Now, the background radiation has been detected differences in support for this idea!


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm


Detailed measurements made by the satellite have shown that the fluctuations in the microwave background are about 10% stronger on one side of the sky than those on the other.

Sean Carroll conceded that this might just be a coincidence, but pointed out that a natural explanation for this discrepancy would be if it represented a structure inherited from our universe's parent.

Meanwhile, Professor Carroll urged cosmologists to broaden their horizons: "We're trained to say there was no time before the Big Bang, when we should say that we don't know whether there was anything - or if there was, what it was."

If the Caltech team's work is correct, we may already have the first information about what came before our own Universe.





.
Logged
 



Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #69 on: 25/09/2008 18:57:57 »
Evidence of the claims / predictions!





Opposition 1

Neutrino transfer the kinetic energy of atoms in kernels.

Proof

http://arxivblog.com/?p=596

Opposition 2

The entire visible universe of energy is moving away from one point on which is really far away from the visible universe outside!

Proof 1

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm

Proof 2

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:25:40 by BenV »
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #70 on: 26/09/2008 07:27:41 »
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2

"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."







As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."

The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #71 on: 26/09/2008 07:30:31 »
"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."

As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."

The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:26:13 by BenV »
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #72 on: 27/09/2008 06:20:03 »
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of undeclared?

Would you have been able to predict in this video



through

Dark flow phenomenon?

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows. html




Logged
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #73 on: 27/09/2008 08:11:13 »
That YouTube video is just plain ridiculous. Whoever made it understands neither physics nor cosmology. Quasars could be galaxies beyond the visible universe? If they're beyond the visible then, by definition, they must be invisible. And what does "invisible" mean? Yes, WE CAN'T SEE THEM!

The 2nd link doesn't work.
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #74 on: 28/09/2008 14:17:02 »
You should look about that video and some other!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF41G3gGYHA

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace

Here i told 28.5.2008, there can be phenomena like dark flow. Lets using google translation!

"The baby Galaxies

http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/ta/index.php?title=hubble_paljasti_massiiviset_vauvagalaksi&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1


Maybe these baby galaxies are from different energyconcentration than older galaxies. If so, then the baby galaxies could be moves to detect this.

Both concentrations of energy, therefore, are located in the visible universe outside and they are expanded, and emit energy waves with a galaxy nature.

Heitämpä So ilmoille suspicion here!

RemonttiJukteri"
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:26:37 by BenV »
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #75 on: 29/09/2008 06:22:23 »
You should look about some video first!


http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Redshifting ( no doppler) with entropy
« Reply #76 on: 13/11/2008 07:30:42 »
When star born, it was different kind of situation for light what we have today!

When the stars are born, was moving in space, much less fotoneita than today. The old light is not faced with very little light to the future! How does that seemed to light and how the current situation now affects arising from the light?






.
Logged
 



Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #77 on: 18/02/2009 12:51:18 »
Bose-Einstein condensate!

Could it be possible that the particles of a laserbeam absorb the energy
radiating from the expanding qvarks with them?
This way energy radiating from the separate atomcores can not reach the
expanding atomcores nextby?

After that expanding qvarks of the separately expanding atomcores overlapp.

An energyconcentration that has composed of very dense energy has born and its hot / dense energy is able to keep itself hot / dense.
This way the energy of Bosen-Einstein condensate does not radiate nearly at all its energy away from itself!

(Maybe later The expanding qvarks have locked themselves to expand side by side?)

In the area between the expanding qvarks the moving photon meets so much dense energy that its movement slows down significantly.

For example the speed of a runner slows down involuntarily when the runner meets a traffic jam, but as soon as the runner meets a less dense space that does not transform, he can accelerate his speed. To accelerate his speed the runner must transform his body energyto a less dense energy! In other words the runner must make the substance that he consists of to transform faster than usually in a certain area to a less dense energy.

If the energy f a photon passing through the Bosen-Einstein condensate does not transform it is based on the fact that the particules are able to
recycle the energy they meet! Also the cores of expanding atoms are able to recycle the energy coming towards the core!













Did you know that everything that exists, it is one and the same thing which we canname energy.

This energy is not the matter, instead it is what exists inside of the atomic
nucleus of the matter and its density changes all the time to less density.

When there is no energy coming from outside, then it gets cold because the energy emission does not get from the atomic nucleus more of this energy to burst.For this reason, throughout expanding atomic nucleus do not push themselves away from each other so powerfully as earlier, at which point that into the atomic nucleus comes more of this energy in particles.

At the end, the so called quarks existing in different atomic nucleus interlace and form a quark unit.
Also, the energy existing inside the quarks changes all the time to less dense energy,moreover quarks burst out energy waves.

In the center of a quark unit big enough arises a sufficient pressure, whereupon quarks get to burst a lot of
energy towards each other. Therefore this quark unit starts to emit abondant energy from itself.
This way from the absolute zero we jump straight to high temperatures.

Let's talk about temperature in the absence of atom's oscillations, but rather how much energy one piece emits.
Also there is a meaning about the density of the emission: How the particles are and how close they are to one another.







.






Hot in the direction of cold!

Dense in the direction of a less dense space!

The space does not change!

The energy transforms to a less dense energy!

At the same time an energy that is transforming to a less dense energy, pushes itself towards an area where exists less energy. This happens because the energy transforming to less dense doesn´t have te room to stay in a equally small area that doesn´t change.

Also the energy in the qvarks transforms all the time into a less dense energy.

From outside there doesn´t come almost at all energy towards the atomcores when reaching the absolute zero point. To atomcores in which the energy transforms all the time into a less dense energy. This way the expanding
atomcores do not expload their energy towards each other and they don´t push themselves away from each other so powerfully.

Eventually the qvarks of the separate atomcores interlock with each other. A big consentration of the qvarks has developed. Also in the middle of the centre a pressure has been developed. This pressure is based on a fact that
the qvarks radiate their energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other according to the same relation as they expand.

An adequate pressure is developed in the middle of the big expanding consentration of the qvarks and this pressure makes the qvarks to explode a lot of their energy towards each other.

This is why a lot of energy begins to burst / radiate from the qvark consentration.

This is how extremely cold turns in a moment into extremely hot.

The heath is not a atomcores. The vibration of the atoms is consequence of outward coming energy that reaches the atomcores.

The so called "Caloric" is not a chemical element.

"Caloric" is the one and the same thing that exists in all atomcores. It can be called energy. Or with any other name.
Energy transforms all the time to a less dense energy in a space that does not change.

Also the movement of all the atoms of the world happens towards cold in other words towards a space where is less energy!
The expanding atoms push themselves towards a less dense area in space.

The energy of the planets push themself away from the sun in a curved orbit. There is more and denser energy than outside the sun.

The stars push themselves in a curved orbit away from the centre of the galaxy where is more and denser energy than in the outside of the galaxy.

The energy of the visible universe pushes itself away from the area that exists really far outside the visible universe.In that area there exists more and denser energy than in the visible universe. Outside that area energy is less denser.

The energy of the visible universe pushes itself towards the cold. In other words towards a less dense area in a space that does not change.
« Last Edit: 20/02/2009 06:45:22 by JukriS »
Logged
 

Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • Photonics
Re: Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #78 on: 18/02/2009 16:28:29 »
The modern theory of Quantum_chromodynamics is your mainstream competitor in Quark theory.

I notice you spell your hypothetical particles qvarks. I'm not sure if it is an invention of yours, or are you developing a new version of QCD?  It might be helpful if you look over the huge body of experimental evidence that exists. Any new theory would have to be compatible with those experiments.

Quote from: the link
Quantum chromodynamics (abbreviated as QCD) is a theory of the strong interaction (color force), a fundamental force describing the interactions of the quarks and gluons making up hadrons (such as the proton, neutron or pion). It is the study of the SU(3) Yang–Mills theory of color-charged fermions (the quarks). QCD is a quantum field theory of a special kind called a non-abelian gauge theory. It is an important part of the Standard Model of particle physics. A huge body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years.
« Last Edit: 18/02/2009 16:33:47 by Vern »
Logged
 

Offline JukriS (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #79 on: 20/02/2009 06:44:52 »
Sorry! Quarks, of course! I think, that quarks are same kind o expanding energyconcentration who emit expanding energy...



I write that for some other dude!

"
You cant see, heard, taste, feel or smell space or

angel, doll, seraph, cherub

So, it is empty statement to say. space expanding!

You cant make any test with space!
If some thing changing in any way, it stay some location/position, where that thing can changing.

Energy changing in space who dont changing, you know?

If space changing, space post to be some place, where space can changing.

So, you have a very stupid theory!

You have a energy who change in space who change some place?


Maybe our energy it is that space who expanding in back space who dont change!


If you are stupid like people before Kopernikus and Calileo Calilei, who believe that Sun take a round, you can forget my right idea.


You BELIEVE expanding space, even you cant make any test with space!



You cant see how space expanding!

You see how old light it is redshifting, because photons expanding and emit energy and with that energy expanding photons pushing themselfs and thats why old light it is redshifting!



And yes. Sun energy making now energyball, who have a 9 - 10 billion light years diameter/splitter.

So, thats proof, Sun energy expanding all a time!

Also all atoms nucleus energy expanding all a time.


You cant told how atom nucleu can hang electrons some orbit!

Electrons dont stay outside atom nucleus!

Electrons moving to next atom nucleus and get that expanding more energy outside expanding atom nucleus......"

.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.635 seconds with 71 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.