The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?

  • 21 Replies
  • 5390 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

This topic contains a post which is marked as Best Answer. Press here if you would like to see it.

guest39538

  • Guest
Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« on: 27/02/2016 13:15:22 »
As title?
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #1 on: 27/02/2016 19:07:03 »
Why cant a question be true?  I have asked a question and you have moved into that cant  be true. a simple no may have done. That is rather confusing.

Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5288
  • Activity:
    17.5%
  • Thanked: 445 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #2 on: 27/02/2016 23:35:00 »
Quantum singularity is an invention of science fiction.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_singularity
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #3 on: 28/02/2016 11:23:47 »
Thank you for pointing that out ,  however I was told in another thread don't call my visual idea in my head a ''naked singularity'' , so I called it a quantum singularity.  But never mind mate I am going to quit now after writing loads of my new theory , for another forum to ''gang'' up on me to drive me out of the forum. 
Including several members off here under different user names. Clearly the trolls ''own'' these forums, and the mods are biased by the majority .   There is a specific group of these ''trolls'' , about 4-6 of them , who all seemingly know each other and crash threads, I think these individuals aim to hamper and disrupt science always.  They have done this for the entire time I  have been on the net. 



Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5288
  • Activity:
    17.5%
  • Thanked: 445 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #4 on: 28/02/2016 11:50:30 »
Looking at your description in the other thread I can't really see what it is. You could call it a Box Singularity until you've worked out more of the theory.

Although I occasionally look at other forums (see you there by the way), I only belong to one other which you know about. Haven't recognised other members from here, but have seen a group who frequent other forums. Whether you think they are ganging up on you, or just trying to point out the truth really depends on your point of view and how much knowledge you have of physics.

Have fun with your theory.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #5 on: 28/02/2016 12:04:15 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 28/02/2016 11:50:30
Looking at your description in the other thread I can't really see what it is. You could call it a Box Singularity until you've worked out more of the theory.

Although I occasionally look at other forums (see you there by the way), I only belong to one other which you know about. Haven't recognised other members from here, but have seen a group who frequent other forums. Whether you think they are ganging up on you, or just trying to point out the truth really depends on your point of view and how much knowledge you have of physics.

Have fun with your theory.

I already know my theory in full. I have some of it already written.

http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/28849-stange-claim-from-a-physics-and-math-forum-thread/



These people colin are professional trolls, they dont discuss science, they insult, repeat posting wiki links because deep down they know little, all new ideas they come down and slam, they dont discuss the idea, they just post links. 


I can prove the band-width of light propagating through space is 0. By using  the lorentz transformations and area contraction ,


true I am not a scientist, but I certainly can think.


This is my last effort to get somebodies attention. 


 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Disclaimer, not for copy .   

You would need me to explain it in full and I need science to put my  maths in.

I do not give my permission to anyone to copy this diagram or use this diagram without my permission.  I have also intentionally left some bits out.

SR and the lorentz transformations account for angle and not for the linearity or width of light. 
  The band-width  narrows to a box singularity.


cgi basic model using caetasium co-ordinates.( I know I spelt that wrong),



I hate science, I  just have to tell you. 


From observer A's perspective, it is B that is moving and they are stationary, from Observers B perspective, it is A that is moving and they are stationary.

From observer A perspective B=(k=1) and decreases to K=0 a box singularity,   while A remains in its own frame of k=1 


From B's perspective, it is  A that is a box singularity k=0 , and B remains in its own frame of k=1


added - physical experiment.


equipment

2 projectors


1 dual sided screen,


movable tripods for the projector


method.

Place projectors an equal length away from the screen, one either side of the screen , aligning the area of the pictures on the screen,

move either projector increasing the radius linear, observe the picture contract to a box singularity.


This is just one of the principles of The Theory of Realistic. Probably the main principle , but there is a lot of aspects that relate to the principle.












* box singularity.jpg (104.38 kB, 1034x759 - viewed 1541 times.)
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #6 on: 28/02/2016 16:05:43 »
added-

 [ Invalid Attachment ]




* t0.jpg (63.39 kB, 963x744 - viewed 1395 times.)
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #7 on: 28/02/2016 19:00:33 »
added-


 [ Invalid Attachment ]


* l.jpg (39.95 kB, 963x744 - viewed 1360 times.)
Logged
 

Offline puppypower

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1371
  • Activity:
    18%
  • Thanked: 100 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #8 on: 29/02/2016 12:44:28 »
According to sub particle theory, the different flavors of quarks; as shown below, have different masses; energy equivalent.  Depending on how these building blocks arrange, and the amount of energy given off during formation, larger composite particles will form, with a new but limited variety of mass.

Common mass is not quantum singularity, if you use that theory; proton and neutron. The mass of planets is more like a couple of handfuls of states, with only a baby handful of stable states found in great quantities.

A quantum singularity of mass might be possible, but it would be a very limiting and rare case, that exists at the highest energy; composed of pure top quarks. Your vision may be more restricted to mass in the very early universe.

Up ≈ Down ≈ 300 MeV
Strange ≈ 510 MeV
Charmed ≈ 1,500 MeV
Bottom ≈ 4,800 MeV
Top ≈ 91,000 MeV

Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #9 on: 29/02/2016 12:50:17 »
Quote from: puppypower on 29/02/2016 12:44:28
According to sub particle theory, the different flavors of quarks; as shown below, have different masses; energy equivalent.  Depending on how these building blocks arrange, and the amount of energy given off during formation, larger composite particles will form, with a new but limited variety of mass.

Common mass is not quantum singularity, if you use that theory; proton and neutron. The mass of planets is more like a couple of handfuls of states, with only a baby handful of stable states found in great quantities.

A quantum singularity of mass might be possible, but it would be a very limiting and rare case, that exists at the highest energy; composed of pure top quarks. Your vision may be more restricted to mass in the very early universe.

Up ≈ Down ≈ 300 MeV
Strange ≈ 510 MeV
Charmed ≈ 1,500 MeV
Bottom ≈ 4,800 MeV
Top ≈ 91,000 MeV

Thank you for some new information, but I have no idea what it means, but I can also assure you that what you put is not related to the relativity of a Box singularity.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #10 on: 01/03/2016 10:53:30 »
Well it looks like my ideas are no good, looks like I may have to go back painting and decorating for a living and quit science yet again ....
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
« Reply #11 on: 01/03/2016 11:46:04 »
I could cry. Why aren't you hearing.....


 [ Invalid Attachment ]

∵c  (K=1 delta K=0 delta k=1)









* xysplat.jpg (23.84 kB, 601x498 - viewed 1228 times.)
Logged
 

Marked as best answer by on 05/03/2021 00:18:48

guest39538

  • Guest
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #12 on: 01/03/2016 11:57:15 »
    Up close and getting personal , p me off now.

     [ Invalid Attachment ]

    https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/cp.html

    * rgb.jpg (56.65 kB, 601x498 - viewed 1234 times.)
    Logged
     



    guest39538

    • Guest
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #13 on: 01/03/2016 12:22:08 »
    pfffff,.........


     [ Invalid Attachment ]


    * yx1.jpg (45.38 kB, 601x498 - viewed 1202 times.)
    Logged
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #14 on: 01/03/2016 12:30:40 »
    sorry keep thinking more.



    Sorry I missed out z in the integrals.

    ∮ c (y) ≠ ∮ c (x,y,z)

     [ Invalid Attachment ]


    In simplistic terms the light you observe propagating between eye and object is a polymorphism 1 dimensional whole. K=0

    The objects you see are  3 dimensional singularities of light k=1  in the k=0 singularity ''whole''. 

    light is not white light, it is not visually opaque, it is neither a mixture of frequencies, it is a polymorphism substance with a box singularity band width zero. the frequencies of light are a ''result'' of the polymorphism value being zero. If the bandwidth were not zero , you would not see anything different. Consider the invisible man is a polymorphism box singularity.  Ask yourself , how tall is the invisible man, how wide is he, what is his dimensions?  you can't answer because he is one dimensional in every direction.  Relativity speaking  of course.






    * integ.jpg (57.69 kB, 601x498 - viewed 1124 times.)
    Logged
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #15 on: 02/03/2016 10:13:09 »
    added -


     [ Invalid Attachment ]


    The Box singularity uses Newtonian classical mechanics and Einsteinian modern physics to produce a theory of realistic based on the principle Newton and Einstein were both correct about k=0 and k=1


    * lin.jpg (29.96 kB, 601x498 - viewed 1075 times.)
    Logged
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #16 on: 02/03/2016 10:55:57 »
    no physical length contraction

     [ Invalid Attachment ]

    * rest.jpg (41.67 kB, 601x498 - viewed 1037 times.)
    Logged
     



    Offline Ethos_

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1332
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 17 times
      • View Profile
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #17 on: 02/03/2016 14:53:50 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/02/2016 12:04:15


    I hate science, I  just have to tell you. 


    I suggest you try a forum dedicated to, perhaps, philosophy or maybe even drawing cartoons. Maybe Disney will hire you?
     
    Logged
    "The more things change, the more they remain the same."
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #18 on: 02/03/2016 15:24:27 »
    Quote from: Ethos_ on 02/03/2016 14:53:50
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/02/2016 12:04:15


    I hate science, I  just have to tell you. 


    I suggest you try a forum dedicated to, perhaps, philosophy or maybe even drawing cartoons. Maybe Disney will hire you?

    Two attempts at an insult in two posts, you are doing well today  at pressing the keys have a banana.    Those who ''knock'' are those who can not do.   You are quite hilarious, come on and pretend to give cw thomson and friend a lecture about trying to argue in threads, yet you try to flame also?


    I already know you are one of them from sci forum and elsewhere.

    Logged
     

    Offline Ethos_

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1332
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 17 times
      • View Profile
    Re: Is all mass a quantum singularity that distorts space time?
    « Reply #19 on: 02/03/2016 15:36:04 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 02/03/2016 15:24:27



    I already know you are one of them from sci forum and elsewhere.
    BTW, you're the one who says: "I hate science", so what do you expect from members at a science forum?

    And furthermore, I've never been a member of "sci forum". And I further suggest you do something about your paranoia before it consumes you.

    Your questions are a ruse, a stratagem, and a trick to exploit your own personal beliefs. They are dishonest and most everyone here knows that is how you continue to operate. Because mine, and everyone else's answers mean nothing to you, I will begin disregarding your questions as well.

    So Mr. Box, I'll return you to my ignore list. I see now that it was a mistake to remove you from it.
    « Last Edit: 02/03/2016 15:48:36 by Ethos_ »
    Logged
    "The more things change, the more they remain the same."
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

    Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

    Replies: 28
    Views: 24802
    Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
    by yor_on
    What does "time-like" mean in the following sentence?

    Started by scheradoBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 15
    Views: 9365
    Last post 09/02/2018 10:28:21
    by Colin2B
    If you could travel faster than light, could you travel in time?

    Started by DmaierBoard Technology

    Replies: 13
    Views: 14340
    Last post 19/03/2020 14:56:52
    by Paul25
    If the speed of light is constant, time must be constant too?

    Started by Chuck FBoard General Science

    Replies: 4
    Views: 11922
    Last post 19/03/2020 14:51:12
    by Paul25
    If gravity is a warping of time, why are we trying to detect gravity?

    Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 10
    Views: 5088
    Last post 19/03/2020 14:48:11
    by Paul25
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.241 seconds with 78 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.