The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. View on particle detection
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

View on particle detection

  • 0 Replies
  • 3107 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline William McC (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 158
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
View on particle detection
« on: 28/08/2016 05:32:34 »
Quote from: Atomic-S on 27/08/2016 05:32:35
Quote
One atom of electricity, is not going to register in your eye, a sensor, or on anything else. It takes an infinite number of particles of electricity (light) to create or relay an effect.
Individual subatomic particles are being detected all the time:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger_counter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photomultiplier

That would be comical if we were not so arrogant and missing the boat when identifying reality from crazy dreams.

The modern scientist does not understand infinite.
Passing by a single atom in a fraction of a fraction of a second, there are an infinite number of particles of electricity creating, stabilizing the atom, and then carrying information about the atom it just contacted onward. Information about location, distance to the next atom in its vicinity, the temperature, the light present, x-rays present, you name it that one single particles velocity carries information about where it has been. However one particle is worthless. The reality is a weighted average of an infinite number of particles passing by that single atom. As I stated it takes an infinite number of particles to bring your eye up to a point it can sense light from the smallest aperture that is practical to transmit light.

The lie is so apparent most are afraid to call the liar out, because he is either very sick (insane) or some kind of sober serial killer, with the backing of almost all governments on earth. Which the governments if push comes to shove will blame you the citizen because they said they were going to miseducate you, your children and everyone else. The real world is a mean rugged place if you have the stomach for it. Demonstrate one particle bringing you a picture. Demonstrate one particle being picked out of an infinite number of particles. When that seems insane you are on the right path.

The smallest micro chip on earth is barbaric in structure and texture, to the atoms size.

We know that all matter elements, in pure form are bonded by a siamese bond to themselves. Yet that bond cannot be viewed by an electron microscope. That is because the electron microscope as I have mentioned needs an infinite number of particles to register an image to the electron microscope. So although they get images of a tiddy looking structure, from say gold, they are not even seeing a single atom. They are seeing a pattern created by the structure of the substance under the electron microscope, created by an infinite number or particles of electricity passing through it. But they are not seeing the atom. We reached the maximum we will ever be able to perceive of the atomic world back in the sixties. The best laid it to rest, by stating "We will never be able to see it. And no instrument will ever record it." They were not slow or stupid, they were highly accurate and not chasing fairy dust.

Those looking for papers and approval from houses of counterintelligence bought and paid for by a known corrupt government which of course is not science, are chasing fairy dust. Science, reality is in your garage basement or apartment for observation.


Sincerely,

William McCormick
« Last Edit: 28/08/2016 06:02:08 by William McC »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.364 seconds with 25 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.