[the5thforce (OP)]

Im very disappointed to realize young women are increasingly gay or bisexual at a rate far higher than men indicating sexuality cannot be treated equally if we hope to create an equitable society, even more tragic it appears lesbians still desire procreating which only adds more men to the dating market while simultaneously removing women(themselves) on an already unsustainably-overpopulating planet, obviously this equation can only exponentially increase hostility/aggression in a bigger stronger faster higher-neuron higher-testosterone gender(men) which has played out globally throughout our history with religion having emerged to contain the problem, the best approach appears to be relentlessly discouraging homosexual procreation/parenting because creating a lopsided dating competition with your own opposite gender offspring is probably the biggest cause of all human conflict in history(greco-roman to modern day) and often misplaced for racial/religious conflict even though an albino sub-saharan african can very happily combine with a black sub-saharan african(or any other color, it happens all the time), not to mention all human sperm and eggs are white and shiny, while no amount of same-gender "combining" can properly nourish the mind or body of different-gender offspring...

To bury the point, even a lesbian removing a bisexual from the dating market is inequitable to men and should be highly discouraged

Your energy equity in an equal society, built on the decisions of your parents who you can blame for every wrong in your life since they brought you here with a positive expectation while blaming yourself for every success in life, can only be fair when you choose the very best you can attain in the opposite gender meaning lesbians with transexual males, gays with transexual females, or else staying single because it can only mean you fail to empathize with all the work it took to afford your energy within a zero sum self contained duality and you desire more than you can contribute, until we reach a state of equilibrium whereby those who desire more than their equity can agree and willingly remove themselves from the dating market entirely without issue, the only full choice you can ever have after being brought into the circle of energy is to leave the circle. Until then we can never attain a fair society only random chaos which will tear us apart as entropy will eventually tear apart all energy in existence and we acheive nothing with choice.

Conclusion: women have unlocked orgasmic potential and men do not, men have worked their entire existence with a refractory period in order to afford unchained females to make up the difference of intrinsically unbalanced genders, very slightly less aesthetic males proportional to the lack of female effort to acquire their best true equal in the opposite gender.

[Demolitiondaley]

Disappointing for who? Is the internet even invented yet in your world? There are similar numbers of gay men and gay women leaving similar numbers of heterosexual men and women to pair off with. A gay couple can bring up a child in a loving, caring and safe home just as well as a heterosexual couple. Religion didn't contain the "problem" it violated the human rights of gay people. I think you're trolling.

[the5thforce (OP)]

I said im disappointed along with the other 60%+ of unhappily single men, gay households of all their increasingly ridiculous variety are known to more than double the rate of suicide, drug dependancy, depression and all other forms of mental illness in 2017, along with motivate the biggest human meat grinder in the world currently its called ISIS, are they no longer people?

[Demolitiondaley]

You have edited your post and changed the wording from "It is disappointing" to " I'm disappointed" and added extra information. You are entitled to your opinion but I believe your reasoning is wrong. I may have been mistaken believing you were trolling. Actually it now seems you believe in what you are saying and have put a great deal of thought into it. I agree to disagree, I hope your circumstances improve and you find love and happiness.

[alancalverd]

You don't have to spend much time in female company to realise that men are redundant in western society, and are regarded as a waste of food by most women. 

Other species either produce fewer males (bees and ants) or rely on male combat and competition to ensure that only the fittest get to mate. Homo sapiens found a use for lots of males when we were hunters and farmers, but we do not play an essential part in a mechanised society where almost all offspring survive to adulthood and are educated en masse (so child rearing need not occupy a significant part of a female's life) and upper body strength has no market value.

Thus heterosexual pair bonding has no societal value, testosterone is useless, and men are scrap. One interesting indicator is the growing fashion for male vocalists with a naturally high pitch or good falsetto - hairy-chested basses don't get recording contracts these days. Look down your high street - how many mens' outfitters are there, compared with shops selling stuff for women to wear  or throw away?  Quite different from even 50 years ago.

Best advice is to a young man these days get yourself transgendered, invest in a good razor, and excel at sport. There's no way a team with all-XX chromosomes can beat fifteen huge, balding  XYs with their external genitalia removed.

[jeffreyH]

Your world view is unique.

[alancalverd]

The privilege of a scientific education, coupled with the curse of  extreme honesty.

[GoC]

Alan-

   Sounds like you have to shave your chest hair every 4 hours to compete.

[the5thforce (OP)]

To simplify: sex requires opposite sexes, dont spread sex if you dont like sex.

[zx16]

Surely it would be better, if more men got into bed with men.  Then wouldn't they be more interested in kissing and loving each other, rather than starting wars?

[the5thforce (OP)]

Surely it would be better, if more men got into bed with men.  Then wouldn't they be more interested in kissing and loving each other, rather than starting wars?

Sword fights never end well and surprisingly most men prefer not to make a regular habit out of inserting their most valued organ into the same place toxic human waste is stored and expelled from else why would they create toilets to have a flush button? Neither does constipation, colon/rectal fissure leading to scar tissue, irritation from dried artificial lubricant/semen, hiv, and wearing adult diapers before age 40 all in pursuit of an inferior hole to begin with, I'd save the trouble and buy a large mirror to place over my bed if I couldnt get enough of my own form. Even if these could be overcome why would a man waste valuable time and affection with someone he can never hope to create a new life with or witness the power of our DNA combining with the person we love. Opposite genders inherently provide a different perspective intended to stimulate the mind which includes occasional disagreement and of course stimulate the body with the full sensation spectrum- pain and pleasure

If a girl is after cara delevigne with xy genitals, find cara delevigne with xy genitals, if you cannot find cara delevigne with xy genitals find the next best thing, that is your only sexual equity in this life and if youre only after your own genitals i hope you explore them until you can handle yourself enough to join our gender diverse adult society else find one of the many lonely transexual males to bump holes with and lick from mediocre unequal/impersonal angles until you desire more complexity

[the5thforce (OP)]

Also consider the role clothes might play in disrupting healthy desensitization to our own form, curiosity creating precedent and bias overcoming function

If a lesbian does not enjoy sex why create a son to desire what you are unwilling to give or force the next girl to do what you are unwilling to do else force your son to stay single when you are unwilling to stay single which wouldve increased your sons opportunities in the local dating pool to begin with

Theres a word for lesbians who prey exclusively on bisexual women

[the5thforce (OP)]

Opposite sexes are required for sex to exist, sex is the primary function of all dual gender organisms on earth from which all other functions and genetic complexity evolve based on the life and mating choices of all previous related organisms in the lineage which creates the structure of their DNA, throughout life DNA is radioactively altered allowing for more mutation to occur the longer the organism survives. The sex organs of both genders share analogous structures intended to ensure both are capable of enjoying sex, orgasm stimulation evolved as the function of all sex organs, when sex is not enjoyed it is no different than organ failure and shouldnt be replicated, you may as well be a different species if you cannot find a way to enjoy the varied sensations of sex which can include both pain and pleasure(switch) combined to suit preference using technique(foreplay, speed, cadence, arrousal level), so long as flesh is in contact there will be stimulation

If you cannot find a way to enjoy sex do not replicate sex and do not procreate, lesbians who cannot enjoy sex can only create daughters with less ability to enjoy sex and sons who can only create daughters with less ability to enjoy sex, while gay men i assume can only create a tendency to prefer stirring the unsanitary toxic waste of another human as the anus is only an inch away from the vaginal opening

[the5thforce (OP)]

Until we have the ability to manipulate our DNA in realtime to become any shape desired, we should work to attain the most equitable shapes. We should also acknowledge that even the most exotic shapes would tend to prefer hetero-interaction with endless ability to switch so we should keep this in mind when deciding what is moral and most equitable

[the5thforce (OP)]

The uncertainty principle is a dichotomy and a spectrum simultaneously which can only move towards entropy equilibrium, since all energy in existence is caused by the uncertainty principle (nothing/uncertainty/"female" vs something/principle/"male") we can apply the concept to any dichotomy to achieve equilibrium. Most people would agree sex is our most desired interaction in life meaning a lack of sex causes the least desireable outcomes as a society which is why in order to attain a fair and balanced society we should work to achieve sexual equilibrium. Sex is a non-overlapping structurally-genetically analogous spectrum in all but cases of intersex genitals, game theory dictates that discouraging homosexual procreation is the only way to contain the spread of asexuality even if only considering that homosexuals have inherently fewer dating options/less opportunity, but since our sex organs are analogous and all of our minds use the same laws of physics, we can only assume homosexuality is the result of undesireable physical traits. The most humane way to contain this sexual disruption so we can reach equilibrium is to discourage homosexual procreation to prevent creating more people with fewer opportunity both homosexuals and even worse their potential heterosexual offspring who can only inherit these undesireable physical traits. Sex or gender is just one example of a dichotomy-spectrum, since we need all the functional genetic diversity we can physically sustain else increase the risk of fatal mutation, disruptions to secondary spectrums such as racism and religious hostility can only be the result of sexual disruption

[the5thforce (OP)]

Relevant info from another thread:

I read an article on human pheromones being a myth which I disagree with, under the best circumstances where the mother and father are both present and provide a positive influence on the childs life we learn to associate male and female scents with whatever (hopefully healthy) early intimate interactions we had with our parents and siblings carrying into adulthood

[smart]

Sexual orientation is the product of our free will (undetermined/quantum logic).

We have the freedom to pick up a partner independently of the configuration of our DNA genes,
and the freedom to have sex (or not) independently of our mental states.

[the5thforce (OP)]

Sexual orientation is the product of our free will (undetermined/quantum logic).

We have the freedom to pick up a partner independently of the configuration of our DNA genes,
and the freedom to have sex (or not) independently of our mental states.

Thats only true until gays artificially procreate spreading their incompatible gay genes onto their offspring, what about their kids free will?

[smart]

Thats only true until gays artificially procreate spreading their incompatible gay genes onto their offspring, what about their kids free will?

There's no such thing as gay genes. Sexual orientation is independent of our biological reproductive system. Even animals can turn into homosexuality, then go back to heterosexual behavior.

[the5thforce (OP)]

Thats only true until gays artificially procreate spreading their incompatible gay genes onto their offspring, what about their kids free will?

There's no such thing as gay genes. Sexual orientation is independent of our biological reproductive system. Even animals can turn into homosexuality, then go back to heterosexual behavior.

All minds use the same laws of physics, homosexuality can only be caused by dysfunction, in animals the dysfunction is mainly pheromone sensory disorder, in humans the dysfunction is sex organ size, gay's sex organs are usually too big or too small which is why they dont enjoy sex in the right place, to contain deviant organs we need to discourage gay procreation