[smart (OP)]

The recent shooting in Quebec city is evidence of psychosis triggered by fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure. I believe the net increase in particulate matter exposure is caused by clandestine geoengineering activity in the troposphere, causing (TLR4-mediated) microglial/dopaminergic and MicroRNA dysfunctions in sensitive people.

This observation is a experimental evidence of the selective neurotoxicity of clandestine geoengineering activity. It provides a rational model to link long-term PM2.5 exposure to the pathological symptoms of psychosis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762128/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4878556/

[smart (OP)]

More details here: https://www.reddit.com/r/chemtrails/comments/609s8u/experimental_evidences_linking_clandestine/

[Bored chemist]

"The recent shooting in Quebec city is evidence of acute psychosis caused by limbic encephalitis"
Says who?
Also, since you are on record as saying the CIA time travelled to produce "chem trails" for John Constable to paint in the 19th century, your judgement is, shall we say "Questionable"  isn't it?
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=67720.msg509733#msg509733

Why do you keep posting this dross?
Do you like being laughed at?

[smart (OP)]

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accept as being self-evident.

   

[Bored chemist]

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accept as being self-evident.

   

Yep, and nonsense gets stuck at the first hurdle.

I see you are unable to answer the fairly obvious question I posed.
Does that mean you have accepted that there is, in fact, no evidence to support the idea?

[smart (OP)]

Does that mean you have accepted that there is, in fact, no evidence to support the idea?

It's basically pointless to discuss with you since your perception of geoengineering is biased. Furthermore, I'm not convinced you really understand the concept of a "experimental evidence".

[alancalverd]

Also, since you are on record as saying the CIA time travelled to produce "chem trails" for John Constable to paint in the 19th century, your judgement is, shall we say "Questionable"  isn't it?

I object most strenuously to this misallocationof intellectual property. That obvious  bullshit was entirely my invention. The fool merely swallowed it, and should not be given credit for its provenance. Fact is, it was fake news. It was really the KGB.

[smart (OP)]

I object most strenuously to this misallocationof intellectual property. That obvious  bullshit was entirely my invention. The fool merely swallowed it, and should not be given credit for its provenance. Fact is, it was fake news. It was really the KGB.

Nice thread hijacking attempt, alancalverd.

[smart (OP)]

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=69983

[Bored chemist]

Does that mean you have accepted that there is, in fact, no evidence to support the idea?

It's basically pointless to discuss with you since your perception of geoengineering is biased. Furthermore, I'm not convinced you really understand the concept of a "experimental evidence".

I am biased
I stubbornly refuse to believe in things for which there is not a shred of evidence.
 Why do you see that as a problem?

Have you noticed, btw, that you still haven't answered my question?

[smart (OP)]

Does that mean you have accepted that there is, in fact, no evidence to support the idea?

It's basically pointless to discuss with you since your perception of geoengineering is biased. Furthermore, I'm not convinced you really understand the concept of a "experimental evidence".

I am biased
I stubbornly refuse to believe in things for which there is not a shred of evidence.
 Why do you see that as a problem?

Have you noticed, btw, that you still haven't answered my question?

What credible evidences do you got to disprove the link between solar geoengineering and PM2.5-associated mortality
rate?

[smart (OP)]

Air pollution may affect the limbic system and alter miRNA expression.

[smart (OP)]

Air pollution may affect the limbic system and alter miRNA expression.

Evidence of activation of the Toll-like receptor-4 proinflammatory pathway in patients with schizophrenia: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853215/

[Bored chemist]

You had no evidence a few months back when you started this, and you still have none.
Air pollution is bad for people.
Nobody is disputing that.
It's entirely possible- even likely,- that it damages the limbic system.

But you have no evidence whatsoever of geoengineering- clandestine or otherwise.

[smart (OP)]

But you have no evidence whatsoever of geoengineering- clandestine or otherwise.

Solar geoengineering is clandestine because it is a "top-secret" military program. Denying the existence of this activity is what the CIA want. Please accept reality and move forward.

[Bored chemist]

But you have no evidence whatsoever of geoengineering- clandestine or otherwise.

Solar geoengineering is clandestine because it is a "top-secret" military program. Denying the existence of this activity is what the CIA want. Please accept reality and move forward.

I accept evidence, rather than pointless repetition of a fantastic claim.
You have yet to cite any evidence- so, obviously, I don't believe you.

[smart (OP)]

I accept evidence, rather than pointless repetition of a fantastic claim.
You have yet to cite any evidence- so, obviously, I don't believe you.

Your systemic denial of all evidences I posted on this forum about clandestine geoengineering is proof that the disinformation system is working.

[Kryptid]

Your systemic denial of all evidences I posted on this forum about clandestine geoengineering is proof that the disinformation system is working.

So where did you post the evidence showing a definitive link between pollution and geoengineering? I don't see it. Remember, you need to show that the pollution in question is caused by geoengineering specifically and not some other source (of which there are many).

What credible evidences do you got to disprove the link between solar geoengineering and PM2.5-associated mortality
rate?

You are shifting the burden of proof. It isn't up to others to disprove your claims, it is up to you to demonstrate them to be true.

[smart (OP)]

So where did you post the evidence showing a definitive link between pollution and geoengineering? I don't see it. Remember, you need to show that the pollution in question is caused by geoengineering specifically and not some other source (of which there are many).

The correlation between air pollution and solar geoengineering is implicit: "The recent shooting in Quebec city is evidence of  psychosis triggered by fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure."

[Kryptid]

The correlation between air pollution and solar geoengineering is implicit: "The recent shooting in Quebec city is evidence of  retrograde amnesia triggered by fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure."

You have not demonstrated that geoengineering is the source of the pollution in question.