The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?

  • 5 Replies
  • 3386 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Europan Ocean (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 527
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?
« on: 22/03/2017 10:44:51 »
I think it was the 11th century and people witnessed a supernova in the sky. The light reached the Earth and following this will come the mass ejection. It must have been larger star than the sun. After such a time and distance the blast must have thinned in dispersion, like an expanding bubble, and grown cold. My question is, what measure of matter, be it Oxygen, iron or gold... will actually hit the Earth? A million tonnes? And over how many hours? What effect will it have?


News reports mention our nearest star. I read it is a red dwarf with small rock planets in the habitable zone that contain water. After the red giant phase, I wonder how any water remained, or did it come from the shrinking back of the red giant? Perhaps a mass ejection could leave behind residue.
« Last Edit: 29/03/2017 08:45:17 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline Europan Ocean (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 527
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Mass ejection from supernova reaching the earth?
« Reply #1 on: 29/03/2017 02:53:10 »
The remnant of the star is called the crab nebula, it is 6,500 light years away and was recorded as a supernova in 1054 by Chinese astronomers.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Mass ejection from supernova reaching the earth?
« Reply #2 on: 29/03/2017 04:16:29 »
Proxima Centauri was never a red giant.
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11036
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?
« Reply #3 on: 29/03/2017 11:46:58 »
Quote from:  Europan Ocean
Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?
In one sense, the heavy elements making up the Earth were created in a series of supernova events. So yes, the mass ejected from remote supernova has reached the Earth, about 5 billion years ago.

However, there is evidence from the presence of Fe60 on Earth that there was a supernova near the Earth sometime in the past few million years. The half-life of Fe60 is about 2.6 million years.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_iron#Iron-60

Quote
The remnant of the star is called the crab nebula, it is 6,500 light years away and was recorded as a supernova in 1054 by Chinese astronomers.
For remnants of the crab nebula to have reached Earth by 2017, the debris would have had to travel at 85% of the speed of light.
I find this unlikely, since many old stars puff off their outer layers, forming shells of gas around the dying star. These clouds of gas then slow down the debris emitted by the supernova. Wikipedia suggests that the debris of a supernova only travels at around 10% of the speed of light.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_remnant

Quote
...our nearest star. I read it is a red dwarf with small rock planets in the habitable zone that contain water. After the red giant phase...
Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf because it has a very low mass - about 1/8 the mass of the Sun. This means Proxima is burning its hydrogen fuel very slowly, and it will still be glowing long after the Sun has passed the red giant phase and turned into a dark cinder.

Proxima is quite dim compared to the Sun, and so the "Goldilocks" planet is much closer to the star than Mercury is to the Sun.

The red giant phase occurs when a star finishes burning hydrogen, and starts burning helium in its core. However, the mass of Proxima Centauri is too low to initiate helium fusion, so it will not enter the red giant phase.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Europan Ocean

Offline Europan Ocean (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 527
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?
« Reply #4 on: 29/05/2017 08:33:22 »
So the mass ejection will reach Earth in about 60,000 years from now?
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11036
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Can mass ejection from a remote supernova reach the Earth?
« Reply #5 on: 29/05/2017 11:21:45 »
Quote from: Europan Ocean
So the mass ejection will reach Earth in about 60,000 years from now?
According to our current understanding, neutrinos from the supernova would have reached the earth almost simultaneously with the visible flash. Neutrinos have a tiny mass, and pass through the interstellar medium (and planets and stars) without hindrance.

Plasma from the supernova starts with a velocity around 10% of c, but it soon hits the clouds of gas and dust that were ejected by the star in its red-giant phase. This would slow it down considerably. After it cleared this barrier, the rapidly attenuating shock wave would have to contend with the interstellar medium which would slow it down more.

The galactic magnetic field would bend the path of the charged particles which make up this plasma, so it probably won't take a straight-line path.

So some particles might make it to Earth in 60,000 years, but it will be a fairly small number, and most that do make will take considerably longer than this.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.521 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.