[PmbPhy]

I have tried in vein to have conversation and to make corrections to science where it is incorrect.

The problem has been and always shall be that you're always wrong since you don't know what you're talking about. I've tried in vain to persuade you to first learn the material that you're claiming is wrong before you decide that its wrong. In all cases you've claimed something is wrong based solely on your lack of understanding the physics. Your response has always been that you're right, its the world that's wrong and you "refuse to learn material that is wrong to prove that its wrong" which is the worst conceivable mistake a person can make. E.g. you can't tell a checkout girl at the supermarket that she gave you the wrong change unless you first learn arithmetic.

Until then nobody on Earth will take you seriously. Especially when you misuse terms like "cult". Nobody here is so dumb as to listen to you.

[Thebox (OP)]

I have tried in vein to have conversation and to make corrections to science where it is incorrect.

The problem has been and always shall be that you're always wrong since you don't know what you're talking about. I've tried in vain to persuade you to first learn the material that you're claiming is wrong before you decide that its wrong. In all cases you've claimed something is wrong based solely on your lack of understanding the physics. Your response has always been that you're right, its the world that's wrong and you "refuse to learn material that is wrong to prove that its wrong" which is the worst conceivable mistake a person can make. E.g. you can't tell a checkout girl at the supermarket that she gave you the wrong change unless you first learn arithmetic.

Until then nobody on Earth will take you seriously. Especially when you misuse terms like "cult". Nobody here is so dumb as to listen to you.

Interesting,  but of course wrong.  I understand more than well.

[Bored chemist]

We were having a lovely conversation.   Pleased define new theory or new ideas to me?

There is no point in the section if I am going to get it locked for no reason.

It wasn't your physics concepts that were the problem. The problem was in the form of inflammatory responses such as saying that Bored Chemist was "full of "beans"", "funny and deluded", that his "subjective opinion is not needed or welcome", calling yourself a "better scientist" than him and that "Einstein was an idiot".

Now you explained it like that, looking back, I was not very nice and apologise to Mr C,  I am getting insulted elsewhere and wrongly took it out on Mr C, my sincere apologies.
c I do not understand why he keeps replying nonsense to everything when I try to be strictly objective. 
Anyway thanks ...

No
You are wrong.
You say "MR C does try to wind me up a bit though," And that's not what I do.

What I'm trying to do is to ensure that anti-scientific nonsense  posted here is challenged. (This is, after all, a science page).

You say "  I do not understand why he keeps replying nonsense"
And that's the problem.
You don't recognise nonsense when you see ( or indeed post) it.
You say things like

1 + 1 = 1

which, a competent 5 year old  would spot as nonsense, but you complain when I point out that it's wrong.
 It's really not my replies that are nonsense. The nonsense really is in your posts.
If you can't see that then you have a problem that's not going to be resolved here- go and explain to your doctor that you think that 1+1 =1 and you don't see why people laugh at you for saying it.

It doesn't help when you say

when I try to be strictly objective. 

but then show that you have no idea what objectivity is.


So, the only way to sort this is for you to go and get your brain fixed: it seems that it currently doesn't work properly.

[Thebox (OP)]

What I'm trying to do is to ensure that anti-scientific nonsense  posted here is challenged.

So you are saying that if people do not agree with science and have new ideas, it is all nonsense?

Challenge anti scientific in main sections of the forum where you suppose to do that.   Do not challenge new theories, discuss the theory.  No offence intended , but you do not know how to behave in a new theories section.

It is no good to keep saying nonsense etc based on repeating your education,  we all have wiki too you know like. 

That is why we , the new theories have theories because we learn something then disagree with that something. 

I disagree with things because I use impossible and impossible.  You should try this some time then you might find yourself making a new theory.   

You automatically accept science to be true, I do not because I am objective and I have to have an absolute answer, 

If I was stupid would I be able to give an absolute answer to Schrodinger cat in the box paradox?

The answer of a transparent box is as transparent as the answer.

I am smart like it or not,  I am sorry if I ruin your imaginary universe.

[Bored chemist]

So you are saying that if people do not agree with science and have new ideas, it is all nonsense?

No.
I am saying that things which clearly do not make sense are not science.

[Thebox (OP)]

So you are saying that if people do not agree with science and have new ideas, it is all nonsense?

No.
I am saying that things which clearly do not make sense are not science.

If something is not making sense to you, do you think this could just  be you do not understand the thing that is not making sense to you?

[tkadm30]

If something is not making sense to you, do you think this could just  be you do not understand the thing that is not making sense to you?

While you're gone, please try learning how to write in English properly, dear physchotic professor...

tk

 

[Thebox (OP)]

If something is not making sense to you, do you think this could just  be you do not understand the thing that is not making sense to you?

While you're gone, please try learning how to write in English properly, dear physchotic professor...

tk

 

When  you  have  gone  perhaps  you  should  try  some  maintenance  on  your  neurological  networking  skills .   I  think  your  processor  is   malfunctioning .

Personal  message  :  You  can't  break  that  which  is  already  broken  as  with  your  poor  use  of  single  spacing  when  you're  writing .  Additionally  I  think  you   may  have  Schizophrenia  and  should  consult  a  doctor  .   

[tkadm30]

When  you  have  gone  perhaps  you  should  try  some  maintenance  on  your  neurological  networking  skills .   I  think  your  processor  is   malfunctioning .

Personal  message  :  You  can't  break  that  which  is  already  broken  as  with  your  poor  use  of  single  spacing  when  you're  writing .  Additionally  I  think  you   may  have  Schizophrenia  and  should  consult  a  doctor  .   

Please go away from my cyber life and never come back. Nobody really cares about your mindless projections and microaggressions, physchotic fool. 

tk

[Thebox (OP)]

physchotic

That's  so  true  ,  I'm  psychotic   today alright  .   People   have  made  me  that  way  ,  internet  people  .  They  want  to  take  the  mick  , watch  this  space .   

[mypaperedit]

 

[Colin2B]

Not only are we banning you, but we have changed your crummy essay writing website to our own url so you can’t be found.
So, who gets last laugh