0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 31/08/2021 10:07:23mRNA vaccines are unnatural. Does it mean that they are bad, as they can prevent some deaths? Vaccines are generally a good thing as they provide a path to a natural end.
mRNA vaccines are unnatural. Does it mean that they are bad, as they can prevent some deaths?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 30/08/2021 11:32:04Would you prefer to live shorter? or live longer instead?Will you do anything to live longer or shorter (according to your own preference)?Or you won't do anything of such efforts, and Is killed by contagious diseases natural enough for you? what about venomous snake, or being struck by lightning?leave it to nature?Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 30/08/2021 11:32:04leave it to nature?Is the best way.
Would you prefer to live shorter? or live longer instead?Will you do anything to live longer or shorter (according to your own preference)?Or you won't do anything of such efforts, and Is killed by contagious diseases natural enough for you? what about venomous snake, or being struck by lightning?
leave it to nature?
You seem to contradict yourself.
When I say leave it to nature I mean the nature of the individual in question as to the steps that they take at a critical time.
In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel gives an overview of the development of mindreading abilities, starting with infant sensitivity to the direction of gaze, and covering the major milestones up to the hidden emotion task, passed at roughly six years of age.
"But why?". In this Wireless Philosophy video, Kevin McCain (University of Alabama at Birmingham) explains the Epistemic Regress Problem. The epistemic regress problem arises from the need to give a reason for your belief, a reason for that reason, and so on. After explaining the problem, he explains how the problem has been used to argue in favor of skepticism, and discusses three possible solutions to the problem.
If someone needs a heart surgery, or chemotherapy to stay alive, should they take it?
What is truly natural is the inner self and we all differ.
We can't be sure about that. Someone else might be tinkering with our mind. It can be done through persuasions, indoctrination, chemicals injection, or some more modern electromagnetic devices such as Neuralink or some non-invasive alternatives.
That would be bad luck if that happened to someone but there is no much that can be done about that some people have a disposition that makes them more susceptible to influence by others.
If we can change someone's will to be a suicide bomber, should we do it? Or should we just kill them?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 03/09/2021 15:29:09If we can change someone's will to be a suicide bomber, should we do it? Or should we just kill them? How can we identify a person that has this intention in order to change their will?
Currently, their social media contents, their diaries, personal communication devices, or results of intelligence activities.In the future, mind reading.
If all or even some of the things can stop bad events then that will be a good thing and if this makes a utopia on earth I'm all for it.
How do you determine if something is good or bad?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 03/09/2021 23:16:46How do you determine if something is good or bad? Like you said before we must cheek their diaries phones hidden bugs and best of all the mind reading technique.
I meant about more general cases. I assume that we agree that suicide bombers are generally bad. How about other things, like theft, charity, lying, honesty, rebellion, war, killing, obedience, faith, etc? When do you say that they are good or bad? Are there any exceptions to general cases? What's the justification for the exceptions?
I don't think it is possible to rid society of all bad intentions especially the minor ones.
It means that we must make priority of things.What's your reference or standard to determine that something is better than the others?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 04/09/2021 12:00:49It means that we must make priority of things.What's your reference or standard to determine that something is better than the others? This is the problem as everyone has their own interpretation and that leads to disagreement utopia is made to measure and will only suit the ones that it fits. The world tries to accommodate the individual utopia is pacific and therefore discriminating and will only accept the willing and wanting to fit occupants. Utopia is for the meek and mild a place of trust no need for police or army. So my conclusion is there will never be a utopia on earth at this time it is a place in the future we all make our own beds the question for all to ask is utopia made for you.
A utopia is an imaginary community or society that possesses highly desirable or nearly perfect qualities for its citizens. The term was coined by Sir Thomas More for his 1516 book Utopia, describing a fictional island society in the south Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South America.
If a society has no defense against invading outsiders or cancerous members or freeloaders, they won't survive for long.