0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
_____________IS THIS THE UNIFYING THEORY?_______________Preface_Is science today blinkering itself with complexity? black holes, bent space/time, string-theory, multi-verses and the search for a “God particle”? Are the answers more simple, more logical than that.Below is the only proposition I am aware of that hypothesizes ‘time’ before “The Big-Bang” and postulates what gravity is, and by association what black holes probably are. Wikipedia, “The consensus among scientists, astronomers and cosmologists is that the Universe, as we know it, was created in a massive explosion that not only created the majority of matter, but the physical laws that govern our ever-expanding cosmos. This is known as The Big Bang Theory”. Can explosions create matter? The accepted chemistry of explosions is that explosions do not create matter, they just transmute it - mostly into heat. Therefore this ‘consensus of opinion’, unchallenged, is a working hypothesis, not a proof. If explosions do not create matter, something did. We have to choose between a scientific explanation or resort to the spectre of God to fill in the gaps in the logic.A UNIFYING THEORYThere cannot be nothing. There was always something. It is proposed that ‘something’ was an infinite, endless, timeless force field oscillating at light speed, precisely as the night sky cosmos as we see it, but empty of all substance. This force field is like an invisible sea of oscillations on multiple frequencies in every dimension. This invisible sea can transmit information in ripples such as radio and television transmissions. Light is a wavelength ripple in the spectrum visible to the human eye.Within this infinite soup of oscillation, atoms became created from the precise collisions of frequencies from every direction which momentarily arrested light speed.A precise collision of frequencies at the positive peak spewed out a proton.The precise collision of frequencies at the negative peak created an electron.The precise collision of frequencies at zero peak produced a neutron.Electrons and protons combine naturally to create hydrogen. The addition of neutron into the mix produces helium.Within infinity’s billions of years, hydrogen was being continuously created and gathered into a cloud of explosive potential. It is proposed that within infinite space and infinite time, the continual and unrestricted growth of this concentration of hydrogen led inevitably and eventually to cause the core temperature of the cloud to heat from its own gravity to reach the auto-ignition point of Hydrogen. Since an atom of hydrogen has a mass of about 1.66 x 10(-24) grams, and a MOLE of hydrogen atoms weighs only 1.008 grams, for the core temperature of a hydrogen cloud to reach the flashpoint of hydrogen, +565.5C, the Big Bang must have been fuelled with material from a hydrogen cloud of near immeasurable size. This combustion spewed this near infinite amount of matter into the cosmos; enough matter to furnish the universe in which we have evolved. The resultant explosive interactions from heat, gravity, velocity mixed with inert helium introduced variety into primal universal equations which caused more complex assortments of matter to evolve into suns; residue material formed planets, et cetera, et cetera. Therefore, it is proposed our universe was not the creation of a superior intelligence, but is a logical and inevitable creation of a force field operating within infinite space and infinite time endlessly creating hydrogen which gathered into a cloud of near infinite size which ultimately and inevitably exploded, spewing a near infinite amount of matter into infinity, to create the universe in which we have evolved. As science stands at the moment, gravity and the Big Bang are accepted as unexplained, ill-defined “absolutes” with inexplicables that only the addition of the spectre God can fully explain. If God cannot be hypothesized scientifically such an existence must be questionable.Wikipedia has only a wild speculation for what gravity actually is.Quote: - “Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass/energy; and resulting in gravitational time dilation, where time lapses more slowly at a lower (stronger) gravitational potential”.That gravity ‘is not a force’ seems to be a contradiction of an obvious fact and is therefore a hypothesis, not a scientific truth. “Curved space-time” is only a logical definition if it is unchallenged. The rest of the universe seems confident gravity is actually a force, but Einstein’s extravagant theory ensures gravity remains incompletely defined.The theory below proposes an inversion of an accepted unchallenged assumption, but overall it is elegantly and provocatively logical. If this inversion carries, then understanding our universe also adjusts. The Eureka moment came from an inversion of one of sciences ‘assumptions’ and everything fell into logical place. Observation noted electrons streaming towards protons and the obvious conclusion is that protons attract. What is more difficult to explain is how this attraction somehow reverses into repulsion in close proximity and directs electrons into orbiting protons to create hydrogen. The proposal for consideration is that it is electrons that attract, but with relatively insignificant mass, it is electrons that do the moving. Therefore the proposal is, in close proximity homing electrons are repelled by protons into circulatory orbits to create hydrogen, the basic element in the Universe. The above inversion leads logically to the proposal that gravity is the attractive force of a mass of electrons, modest in the molten interior of Earth, massive in our Sun. The above proposal further suggests, by association, that ‘black-holes’ may be concentrations of protons repelling all matter, only, over billions of light years, appearing to consume matter.Rstormview@hotmail.com.
Since an atom of hydrogen has a mass of about 1.66 x 10(-24) grams, and a MOLE of hydrogen atoms weighs only 1.008 grams, for the core temperature of a hydrogen cloud to reach the flashpoint of hydrogen, +565.5C, the Big Bang must have been fuelled with material from a hydrogen cloud of near immeasurable size.
There cannot be nothing. There was always something. It is proposed that ‘something’ was an infinite, endless, timeless force field oscillating at light speed, precisely as the night sky cosmos as we see it, but empty of all substance. This force field is like an invisible sea of oscillations on multiple frequencies in every dimension. This invisible sea can transmit information in ripples such as radio and television transmissions. Light is a wavelength ripple in the spectrum visible to the human eye.
Quote from: rstormview on 09/09/2017 15:55:03Since an atom of hydrogen has a mass of about 1.66 x 10(-24) grams, and a MOLE of hydrogen atoms weighs only 1.008 grams, for the core temperature of a hydrogen cloud to reach the flashpoint of hydrogen, +565.5C, the Big Bang must have been fuelled with material from a hydrogen cloud of near immeasurable size. That flash point only applies if there is sufficient oxygen present to ignite the hydrogen. Perhaps what you are thinking about are thermonuclear fusion reactions, which require much, much higher temperatures than chemical reactions do.
Hydrogen did not exist before the big bang