Total Members Voted: 9
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Compare mine to how birds fly. That's mine.What are you making up? What specific about yours that won't work?You have read a lot and never mentioned this before...ImpactEngine has the word impact, you should of said a while ago...Your chatting out your backside. I explain this one and then you say this.Curiosity killed the cat? Now it's Explained woken the dog.YOU WOULD OF GAVE YOU'RE IDEA FOR EVIDENCE BUT NO.YOU COULD OF CAME UP WITH A CRYPTIC CLUE OF IT OR THE INITIALS OF THE WORDS.You're have to contest after a year after my initial patent application.They won't waste their time with you. In fact you may end up being accused of fraud.Is that a threat? Take it as you like.
Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 20:38:59Compare mine to how birds fly. That's mine.What are you making up? What specific about yours that won't work?You have read a lot and never mentioned this before...ImpactEngine has the word impact, you should of said a while ago...Your chatting out your backside. I explain this one and then you say this.Curiosity killed the cat? Now it's Explained woken the dog.YOU WOULD OF GAVE YOU'RE IDEA FOR EVIDENCE BUT NO.YOU COULD OF CAME UP WITH A CRYPTIC CLUE OF IT OR THE INITIALS OF THE WORDS.You're have to contest after a year after my initial patent application.They won't waste their time with you. In fact you may end up being accused of fraud.Is that a threat? Take it as you like.Um, I think you need to chill out. I don't know what you're getting worked up about. My idea was to use a piston that moves forward very quickly, thus forcing the ship to move as well. Then the piston would be retracted back to its starting position very slowly in order to prevent it from pulling the ship backwards. Then the piston would be slammed forward again to repeat the cycle. I abandoned that idea long ago because I now know that Newton's laws prevent it from working. The ship would wobble around its center of gravity and it would not gain any net forward movement. No matter how quickly or slowly I decided to move the piston, it would make no difference.
Never mind kryptic you have repeated yourself.Second stage is good. Slowly. But not the problem compared to the first.First stage is incorrect as obviously yours would be a problem.Need to drive forward slow to fast consistently as not to make the vehicle move. Too soon and will do what you can't prevent. Too slow and not enough energy for impact.This is obvious once you take a second attempt at it though you obviously have not.Congratulations, you have worked out how my"Birds Fly".
Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 22:37:28Never mind kryptic you have repeated yourself.Second stage is good. Slowly. But not the problem compared to the first.First stage is incorrect as obviously yours would be a problem.Need to drive forward slow to fast consistently as not to make the vehicle move. Too soon and will do what you can't prevent. Too slow and not enough energy for impact.This is obvious once you take a second attempt at it though you obviously have not.Congratulations, you have worked out how my"Birds Fly".Yes, I know that my idea would not have worked. Hence why I abandoned it. You can't generate net forward movement just by shifting a weight around inside of an object, no matter how quickly or slowly.
Quote from: Kryptid on 30/09/2017 22:42:59Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 22:37:28Never mind kryptic you have repeated yourself.Second stage is good. Slowly. But not the problem compared to the first.First stage is incorrect as obviously yours would be a problem.Need to drive forward slow to fast consistently as not to make the vehicle move. Too soon and will do what you can't prevent. Too slow and not enough energy for impact.This is obvious once you take a second attempt at it though you obviously have not.Congratulations, you have worked out how my"Birds Fly".Yes, I know that my idea would not have worked. Hence why I abandoned it. You can't generate net forward movement just by shifting a weight around inside of an object, no matter how quickly or slowly.Sounds to me like he wants to dangle a carrot in front of a rocket and he does not know how the pigeons he keeps flies.
Quote from: Thebox on 30/09/2017 22:59:51Quote from: Kryptid on 30/09/2017 22:42:59Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 22:37:28Never mind kryptic you have repeated yourself.Second stage is good. Slowly. But not the problem compared to the first.First stage is incorrect as obviously yours would be a problem.Need to drive forward slow to fast consistently as not to make the vehicle move. Too soon and will do what you can't prevent. Too slow and not enough energy for impact.This is obvious once you take a second attempt at it though you obviously have not.Congratulations, you have worked out how my"Birds Fly".Yes, I know that my idea would not have worked. Hence why I abandoned it. You can't generate net forward movement just by shifting a weight around inside of an object, no matter how quickly or slowly.Sounds to me like he wants to dangle a carrot in front of a rocket and he does not know how the pigeons he keeps flies.It's about the force. If force from one moment to the next is strong enough then the vehicle will move backwards.Yes, I doubt will get it perfect but will be profitable.As I said, like Birds fly but not as birds fly. Birds flap hard down but gently up, thus a difference in force/energy. If birds can fly then so can an ImpactEngine
Thebox, yes sorry I got it wrong.
Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 23:55:59Thebox, yes sorry I got it wrong. Because what you are talking about really is high impact relative velocity. A notion already used in movies such as the A-team movie. In this movie they fall from the sky in a tank. They use high impact velocity to slow down the tanks decent. I suppose in principle it would actually work though.
Quote from: Thebox on 01/10/2017 00:01:38Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 23:55:59Thebox, yes sorry I got it wrong. Because what you are talking about really is high impact relative velocity. A notion already used in movies such as the A-team movie. In this movie they fall from the sky in a tank. They use high impact velocity to slow down the tanks decent. I suppose in principle it would actually work though. If that's true? Yes, but my way and mine only to patent.Ok, if i'm not the first to imagine such then i'm the clever enough one to get it to work.It's about the importance of it and after 1.5 years of age and a semi-floating wheel.You would have to prove pre-existance on how birds fly to back up the doubt as it gave me confidence of forces.It's also about the confidence of wanting to make it work, 49 inventions I think is enough.
Mine is moving the weight slowly to quickly, a more advanced attempt thus not the same
QuoteMine is moving the weight slowly to quickly, a more advanced attempt thus not the sameThat would be a dampening spring for the recoil.
Quote from: Thebox on 01/10/2017 00:01:38Quote from: paulggriffiths on 30/09/2017 23:55:59Thebox, yes sorry I got it wrong. Because what you are talking about really is high impact relative velocity. A notion already used in movies such as the A-team movie. In this movie they fall from the sky in a tank. They use high impact velocity to slow down the tanks decent. I suppose in principle it would actually work though. If that's true? Yes, but my way and mine only to patent.Ok, if i'm not the first to imagine such then i'm the clever enough one to get it to work.It's about the importance of it and after 1.5 years of age and a semi-floating wheel.You would have to prove pre-existance on how birds fly to back up the doubt as it gave me confidence of forces.It's also about the confidence of wanting to make it work, 49 inventions I think is enough.Mine is moving the weight slowly to quickly, a more advanced attempt thus not the same.Hover vehicle is the next stage after road vehicle, not the same as a movie gimmick.
Poll