[opportunity]

Ok. Next question is papers, people, scientists, this is built upon.....any close "link" to this you are explaining?

[guest39538]

Ok. Next question is papers, people, scientists, this built upon.....

It isn't really based on one specific paper or scientist, it is based on science and all the work of  science. 

Coulombs laws of likewise and opposite polarities
Maxwell
Newton's laws of forces
Einsteins space-time and the ''fabric'' of space
Atomic model,
etc....
Based on everything science as ever told me really, their knowledge leading to my drawn conclusion. Of course myself having the ability to do naked science helps

[opportunity]

Ok.

That's a good precedent I'm thinking for this basis of new ideas, otherwise we may as well actually challenge standard ideas as a walk ahead with contemporary ideas.....not sure what to call that forum "section"?

[guest39538]

.not sure what to call that forum "section"?

Challenging semantics?

[opportunity]

.not sure what to call that forum "section"?

Challenging semantics?

"Stating the obvious" is how I call it.

[guest39538]

.not sure what to call that forum "section"?

Challenging semantics?

"Stating the obvious" is how I call it.

So true, sometimes , the obvious is the answer and overthinking can only lead to subjective notions .

[opportunity]

Call a spade a spade. I agree.

So, how well is this theory of yours headed, like a ship in the stormy waters of scientific uncertainty?

[guest39538]

Call a spade a spade. I agree.

So, how well is this theory of yours headed, like a ship in the stormy waters of scientific uncertainty?

More like there is no uncertainty and it is an axiom of the likes of an object ''falls'' to the ground. I am certain it is 100% and there is no other answers or queries on the subject after this. It ''finishes'' off quantum theory and gives space-time it's ''fabric''.   
There is much to explain,  I was thinking maybe writing a book , a paper would be too short maybe.  Perhaps I should approach a publisher ?

[opportunity]

How much money are you willing to spend on this? Cost doesn't seem to phase you? Why not make your ideas relevant to the scientific community first? They might help you out?

[guest39538]

How much money are you willing to spend on this? Cost doesn't seem to phase you? Why not make your ideas relevant to the scientific community first? They might help you out?

Well, I am not rich, I was sort of hoping publishers pay out an advancement while I write the book. I have been explaining to science forums for several year in one way or another. However my use of language back then was not great, so admit-tingly I must of seemed like a troll and sometimes frustration  got the better of me.
Nowadays I am calm and collective, but still, science forums and the supposedly scientists seem to ignore me and my ideas.
I am arguing they are correct but  to me I feel like I am still in the wrong.
 

[opportunity]

Are you sure you're on the right path? Money is one thing, understanding the atom is something else. Who can say money falls from trees, atoms even?

[guest39538]

Are you sure you're on the right path? Money is one thing, understanding the atom is something else.

I do not want to sound arrogant in anyway but I understand the Universe let alone an atom.  There may be a few intricate details I am yet to discover, but my ''box'' of science tries to use strict axioms. 
There is so many misconceptions and poor semantics involved, impossibilities at times.   I have literally took science apart looking at the fundamentals and elementary aspects of it to objectively define conclusions.

[opportunity]

So where is the joy in knowledge?

We can propose the most complete of ideas, yet where is the money shot if we want money?

As abstract as it sounds, understanding space and time "can't" provide an artifical concept such as wealth. Wealth requires a way to be ackonweldged in comparison to others.

"How" therefore are you comparing your theory with others?

[guest39538]

So where is the joy in knowledge?

We can propose the most complete of ideas, yet where is the money shot if we want money?

The Nobel prize, maybe even the turner prize, is a money shot so I believe?

Publishing rights, royalties, tv interviews, lectures,  is a money shot. 

A basic job in science and my own small house would be a money shot to me. 

But joy wise, I would love to see my name on Wiki with my own page.   Because then I exist.

[opportunity]

I agree.

Treading on that requires stepping on their stones...."their stones"....not something they don't register as a "being trodden on".

[guest39538]

I agree.

Treading on that requires stepping on their stones...."their stones"....not something they don't register as a "being trodden on".

Yes exactly, so I am happily stepping on ''their'' stones, but I am polishing ''their'' stones for them.

[opportunity]

I had the impression you had a new "rock" for us to walk towards?

[guest39538]

I had the impression you had a new "rock" for us to walk towards?

A new rock that they do not have the answers too or misinterpret, by using ''their'' stones I have built a new mountain. 

My mountain explains several things and creates a paradox of the existing atomic model. My mountain also gives space physicality in the form of quantum field solidity, (Q.F.S). My mountain rewrites physics using ''their'' own physics as weapons of mass destruction against them, ''their'' physics gives my notion premise .

''Their'' physics becomes frivolous litigation.

[opportunity]

They just need to "get it" right?

That sh1t sucks, I know.

Find a way you can develop what they're doing.

[guest39538]

They just need to "get it" right?

yes , many years ago they told me I was wrong on a Matrix I tried to present involving online poker.  I knew then if they thought that was wrong, then they must be wrong on other things and just need to ''get it right''.