The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The N-field
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 48   Go Down

The N-field

  • 946 Replies
  • 214629 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #820 on: 28/04/2018 18:07:53 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 10:54:42
    I am feeling quite proud of myself. 
    What for?
    Are you proud of trolling?
    Proud of misunderstanding?
    Proud of lying?
    Or just proud of bragging?

    Proud of learning.
    Logged
     



    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #821 on: 28/04/2018 18:09:49 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 10:54:42
    If she's interested I suggest you direct her to things like the Khan academy where she can find out about the real stuff, rather than your garbled, distorted version.
    I teach her nothing but life and safety in life, she will find out and can think for herself.  But actually not a bad idea from you to get her to go on Khan academy.
    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #822 on: 28/04/2018 18:17:28 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:07:53
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 10:54:42
    I am feeling quite proud of myself.
    What for?
    Are you proud of trolling?
    Proud of misunderstanding?
    Proud of lying?
    Or just proud of bragging?

    Proud of learning.
    But you steadfastly refuse to do that.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #823 on: 28/04/2018 18:19:16 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:06:44
    Of course you can't  find anywhere on google what I know. 
    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,


    So which one do you mean?
    Have you posted it, in which case Google will find it, or were you lying about posting it?
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 01:27:08
    She destroyed me in about 2 minutes
    It's not that hard.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #824 on: 28/04/2018 18:25:33 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 18:19:16
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:06:44
    Of course you can't  find anywhere on google what I know.
    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,


    So which one do you mean?
    Have you posted it, in which case Google will find it, or were you lying about posting it?
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 01:27:08
    She destroyed me in about 2 minutes
    It's not that hard.
    The threads in this section Mr C, go look at the sun motion thread.
    Logged
     



    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #825 on: 28/04/2018 19:35:23 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:25:33
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 18:19:16
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:06:44
    Of course you can't  find anywhere on google what I know.
    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,


    So which one do you mean?
    Have you posted it, in which case Google will find it, or were you lying about posting it?
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 01:27:08
    She destroyed me in about 2 minutes
    It's not that hard.
    The threads in this section Mr C, go look at the sun motion thread.
    I looked at it before.
    It didn't say anything informative.
    Would you like to stop messing about and actually say something clear?
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #826 on: 28/04/2018 19:39:32 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 19:35:23
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:25:33
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 18:19:16
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:06:44
    Of course you can't  find anywhere on google what I know.
    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,


    So which one do you mean?
    Have you posted it, in which case Google will find it, or were you lying about posting it?
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 01:27:08
    She destroyed me in about 2 minutes
    It's not that hard.
    The threads in this section Mr C, go look at the sun motion thread.
    I looked at it before.
    It didn't say anything informative.
    Would you like to stop messing about and actually say something clear?

    What makes you think I could ever post something that is literate? 
    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #827 on: 29/04/2018 10:00:39 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 19:39:32
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 19:35:23
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:25:33
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/04/2018 18:19:16
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 18:06:44
    Of course you can't  find anywhere on google what I know.
    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,


    So which one do you mean?
    Have you posted it, in which case Google will find it, or were you lying about posting it?
    Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 01:27:08
    She destroyed me in about 2 minutes
    It's not that hard.
    The threads in this section Mr C, go look at the sun motion thread.
    I looked at it before.
    It didn't say anything informative.
    Would you like to stop messing about and actually say something clear?

    What makes you think I could ever post something that is literate? 
    I'm not asking for literate (though that would be good)
    I'm asking for  a clear direct statement, rather than trolling.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #828 on: 29/04/2018 13:35:52 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 10:00:39

    I'm asking for  a clear direct statement, rather than trolling.

    What is the subject of the statement that you would like clearly written ?
    Logged
     



    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #829 on: 29/04/2018 15:29:30 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 13:35:52
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 10:00:39

    I'm asking for  a clear direct statement, rather than trolling.

    What is the subject of the statement that you would like clearly written ?

    So, it has been so long that you have forgotten what you were talking about.
    Probably time to close the thread.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #830 on: 29/04/2018 15:35:52 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 15:29:30
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 13:35:52
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 10:00:39

    I'm asking for  a clear direct statement, rather than trolling.

    What is the subject of the statement that you would like clearly written ?

    So, it has been so long that you have forgotten what you were talking about.
    Probably time to close the thread.

    The N-field and n-field is an extensive subject that covers a whole range of things.   Is there any specific post you wish to ask a question about ?  Or anything particular you would like me to clarify for you ?

    Logged
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #831 on: 29/04/2018 16:16:19 »
    How about a picture?


    * inflate1.jpg (449.85 kB . 4540x2628 - viewed 3213 times)

    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #832 on: 29/04/2018 18:25:10 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 15:35:52
    Or anything particular you would like me to clarify for you ?
    I'm not sure you have answered any questions about it  thus far.
    All you have done is draw unclear pictures.

    Specifically, I was referring to this

    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,
    where I'm asking you to show us where you told  us about it.
    Or you could just admit you are trolling.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     



    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #833 on: 29/04/2018 19:17:50 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 18:25:10
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 15:35:52
    Or anything particular you would like me to clarify for you ?
    I'm not sure you have answered any questions about it  thus far.
    All you have done is draw unclear pictures.

    Specifically, I was referring to this

    Quote from: Thebox on 27/04/2018 20:05:00
    Go discover space-time cyclones now, I have told you amongst the threads what it is,
    where I'm asking you to show us where you told  us about it.
    Or you could just admit you are trolling.
    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=72983.20

    I explained it briefly in the linked thread and gave a diagram.  Why do you want to know about my ideas if I am stupid and talk nonsense? 

    Has the student surpassed the teachers ?





    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #834 on: 29/04/2018 20:58:53 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 19:17:50
    Why do you want to know about my ideas if I am stupid and talk nonsense? 
    In the hope of showing the errors so you can learn
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 19:17:50
    Has the student surpassed the teachers ?

    No.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #835 on: 29/04/2018 21:03:00 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 20:58:53
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 19:17:50
    Why do you want to know about my ideas if I am stupid and talk nonsense? 
    In the hope of showing the errors so you can learn
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 19:17:50
    Has the student surpassed the teachers ?

    No.


    You mean my spaceship will not fly ?


    * quantum leaper 2..jpg (100.88 kB . 1549x823 - viewed 3210 times)




    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #836 on: 29/04/2018 21:08:20 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:03:00
    You mean my spaceship will not fly ?
    Given that it's based on an idea which is unevinced, and self contradictory; no, it won't.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     



    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #837 on: 29/04/2018 21:19:40 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:08:20
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:03:00
    You mean my spaceship will not fly ?
    Given that it's based on an idea which is unevinced, and self contradictory; no, it won't.
    That is strange, because my propulsion system / stabilisers, are isometrically positioned to ergonomically intelligent design to give an equilibrium of lift, the half sphere design allowing a precise centre point of gravity.  The N-field drive is a boost to only be used in outer space.  There is also lots I am not telling of the mechanism of my drive.



     
    Logged
     

    Offline Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 31101
    • Activity:
      12%
    • Thanked: 1291 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #838 on: 29/04/2018 21:28:48 »
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:19:40
    The N-field drive is a boost to only be used in outer space.
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:08:20

    Given that it's based on an idea which is unevinced, and self contradictory; no, it won't.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    guest39538

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: The N-field
    « Reply #839 on: 29/04/2018 22:19:27 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:28:48
    Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:19:40
    The N-field drive is a boost to only be used in outer space.
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:08:20

    Given that it's based on an idea which is unevinced, and self contradictory; no, it won't.

    Unevinced means  something new, of course you are not going to find definition in the dictionary to my new ideas. 

    You  say my idea is contradictory , please explain?   I ''see'' no contradiction in my own notions.  My spaceship is designed for a critical balance . 
    I can show with a simple experiment that the idea of my drive works in principle. 

    I know what I am talking about , I ''see'' the entire universe is many different ways .
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 48   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags: misunderstanding basic science  / pigeon chess  / delusional thinking 
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.575 seconds with 64 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.