[guest39538]

Interpretation is not pretending .

Bored Chemist isn't the one proposing that polarity has anything to do with how one mass attracts another.

Well to deny it isn't is like denying any of the affects of polarity.   He said that no matter how big a mass is or how small a mass is , the polarities in both masses are equal and proportional , therefore indirectly saying  equal and proportional attracted and repulsed by polarity

[guest39538]

What is the acceleration of opposite charges towards  each other?

9.82m/s2?

[Bored chemist]

He said that no matter how big a mass is or how small a mass is , the polarities in both masses are equal and proportional

Liar.
I made it clear that "proportional" isn't a word you can apply to polarity.

You just ignored it

[Bored chemist]

What is the acceleration of opposite charges towards  each other?

9.82m/s2?

It depends on their separation, the size of the charges and the masses of the charged objects.
It almost certainly won't be 9.81 m/s/s

[guest39538]

What is the acceleration of opposite charges towards  each other?

9.82m/s2?

It depends on their separation, the size of the charges and the masses of the charged objects.
It almost certainly won't be 9.81 m/s/s

So you had a guess and do not really know the answer?

Is there an answer?

Has it ever been measured?

[alancalverd]

Depends on the mass and charge of each.

Force between two charged bodies F = q₁q₂/r²

acceleration of a body of mass m = F/m

so one moves towards the centre of mass at a₁=  q₁q₂/r²m₁ and the other at a₂ = q₁q₂/r²m₂

It is left as an exercise for the reader to calculate the mutual rate of approach as a function of separation r.

Has it been done? You bet. Many times, in many different forms of experiment. One of the simplest is Millikan's oil drop experiment which allows us to determine the charge of an electron as we know the acceleration of an uncharged oil drop would be g.

[Bored chemist]

What is the acceleration of opposite charges towards  each other?

9.82m/s2?

It depends on their separation, the size of the charges and the masses of the charged objects.
It almost certainly won't be 9.81 m/s/s

So you had a guess and do not really know the answer?

Is there an answer?

Has it ever been measured?

Your question made as little sense as asking
"how fast does an animal run?"
The answer is "it depends".
Sorry that you didn't like it, but it's really not down to me.

[guest39538]

What is the acceleration of opposite charges towards  each other?

9.82m/s2?

It depends on their separation, the size of the charges and the masses of the charged objects.
It almost certainly won't be 9.81 m/s/s

So you had a guess and do not really know the answer?

Is there an answer?

Has it ever been measured?

Your question made as little sense as asking
"how fast does an animal run?"
The answer is "it depends".
Sorry that you didn't like it, but it's really not down to me.

Depends on what?

[Kryptid]

Depends on what?

He already said what it depends on: the mass, charge and distance between the two objects. Alancalverd even listed the relevant equations. Since the charge, mass and distance between different objects is variable, the acceleration will be variable as well.

[guest39538]

Depends on what?

He already said what it depends on: the mass, charge and distance between the two objects. Alancalverd even listed the relevant equations. Since the charge, mass and distance between different objects is variable, the acceleration will be variable as well.

Charge and mass has no attractive properties, only the polarity has attractive or repulsive properties. Polarity is a constant, gravity is a constant, more than a coincidence I would say.
Mass if it were a real thing could not be a variable because G is constant and the mass of an object is attracted to the mass of another object.  But mass can be a variate though, so quite clearly a variate can not give a G constant, so mass has absolutely nothing to do with a gravity constant. 
The only constant of matter is polarities.  Therefore the conclusion I reach is that polarity  must be the cause of gravity, 1 constant equal and proportional to another constant.
There is only polarity that is equal so there is only polarity that can give a constant G result. 

[Kryptid]

Charge and mass has no attractive properties, only the polarity has attractive or repulsive properties.

Unsupported statement.

Polarity is a constant, gravity is a constant, more than a coincidence I would say.

Gravity changes depending on the object in question. and how far away you are from the object. Jupiter has much more gravity than the Earth and the Earth's gravitational field is much weaker 1,000 miles away than it is when you are standing on its surface.

Mass if it were a real thing could not be a variable because G is constant and the mass of an object is attracted to the mass of another object.  But mass can be a variate though, so quite clearly a variate can not give a G constant, so mass has absolutely nothing to do with a gravity constant.

Gravity does vary. What, do you think all of the planets have the same gravitational field strength?
 

The only constant of matter is polarities.

Wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_constant#Table_of_physical_constants

Therefore the conclusion I reach is that polarity  must be the cause of gravity, 1 constant equal and proportional to another constant.

There is only polarity that is equal so there is only polarity that can give a constant G result. 

Given that your premises are flawed, your conclusion cannot be trusted.

[guest39538]

Gravity does vary. What, do you think all of the planets have the same gravitational field strength?

9.81 m/s2 pff constant

[guest39538]

Given that your premises are flawed, your conclusion cannot be trusted.

You have not read my unwritten paper on the matter.

[guest39538]

Unsupported statement.

no its not.

[Kryptid]

Gravity does vary. What, do you think all of the planets have the same gravitational field strength?

9.81 m/s2 pff constant

That's the acceleration of gravity at Earth's surface. That doesn't apply on other planets or at high altitudes on Earth.

You have not read my unwritten paper on the matter.

Thanks for stating the obvious...

no its not.

I haven't seen you support it in this thread yet.

[guest39538]

Gravity does vary. What, do you think all of the planets have the same gravitational field strength?

9.81 m/s2 pff constant

That's the acceleration of gravity at Earth's surface. That doesn't apply on other planets or at high altitudes on Earth.

You have not read my unwritten paper on the matter.

Thanks for stating the obvious...

no its not.

I haven't seen you support it in this thread yet.

Let me show something to you, I go to sleep and wake up ''knowing'' things.  I could really say my ideas I must dream up but then when I consider the ideas , sometimes they are a possibility.
I spent years on time and light to come up with my conclusions and the reality of those subjects. The N-field is not something new to me but different to the way I have been thinking about it.  So it is quite new and might take a few years to get a stage where I can explain it with ease.
So please stop expecting me to have all the answers immediately as I have to sleep to ''dream'' up an answer.

What I will tell you is this.

Abstract:  This paper is intended to give a definite shape or structure to the beginning of time and the start of the Universe.  It also intends to give energy an exact definition and by use of Coulomb's laws ,invoke a logical masterpiece that fits reality exact.

Micro-bang wave theory

According to Coulomb's Law and evidently facts , likewise polarities repulse and opposite polarities attract.  However ladies and gentlemen there is no mention or law's on the individualisation of each opposite polarity.  Meaning by this , what actions occur when considering a single polarity of one of the opposite signs?
Now according to the laws of physics and well established scientific facts, we already know ladies and gentlemen, that likewise polarities repulse!
This leaves a question in my mind about the physics of a single polarities existence and how can a single polarity retain itself when it is likewise to itself. 
The physics suggests from the very first creation of a single polarity in a 0 point space as a 0 point energy would just diminish at the speed of light as a micro bang that ''exploded'' creating a wave of itself that permeated for an infinite distance unless interacting with an obstacle in its path. 

to be continued.......edited etc, was just an example of what I really know.

[Kryptid]

So please stop expecting me to have all the answers immediately as I have to sleep to ''dream'' up an answer.

Then please stop expecting us to accept your hypotheses as true until you can give us the needed answers.

[guest39538]

So please stop expecting me to have all the answers immediately as I have to sleep to ''dream'' up an answer.

Then please stop expecting us to accept your hypotheses as true until you can give us the needed answers.

I do not expect anything, I am just sharing my ideas with the scientists, what they do with my ideas is up to them as I am not a scientist.
I think talking to Bogie as helped me clear up my ideas in my own head and your questions and others questions help me to look deeper for answers.

[Kryptid]

I do not expect anything, I am just sharing my ideas with the scientists, what they do with my ideas is up to them as I am not a scientist.
I think talking to Bogie as helped me clear up my ideas in my own head and your questions and others questions help me to look deeper for answers.

Then don't act like your N-field hypothesis has been proven to be true.

[guest39538]

I do not expect anything, I am just sharing my ideas with the scientists, what they do with my ideas is up to them as I am not a scientist.
I think talking to Bogie as helped me clear up my ideas in my own head and your questions and others questions help me to look deeper for answers.

Then don't act like your N-field hypothesis has been proven to be true.

Where do I say I have proven it to be true?


I have not said it is proven to be true however the facts make it very possibly true.

p.s I have proven it true in my own mind because i cant find it to be untrue.