[guest39538]

Well to me , the science over the years everyone has learnt me ''speaks'' to me and says it is possible

You should ask it to repeat itself; you clearly didn't hear it right.

Why do you like being such a troll?

Stop posting unrelated rubbish dude.

[guest39538]

Let me explain this way ,

We have  a cube of energy 10mile³    that is a single polarity we will use q for polarity and - to represent the sign.


q1=10mile³

Now if you can imagine a matrix of 0 point spaces, i.e volume, all  0 points of the matrix are likewise to each other in polarity ?

That's not an explanation. It's word salad.

"The polarity of one point is the same and likewise to all other points of the field yes?"
No.

Huh are you mad?  So you are saying if we have a single polarity field , there is different polarity points within the field? 


I think not, the field is likewise in polarity all over to itself.

[guest39538]

The preconditions of the N-field and n-field are that two opposite polarities are ''Adam and Eve'' and ''Adam'' cannot exist without ''Eve''.

''Eve'' cannot exist without ''Adam''

Because a likewise polarity entropy by the laws of physics has to expand.

[Bored chemist]

Why don't you use the established meanings of technical terms like "polarity".
Your habit of making stuff up isn't helping anything.

[guest39538]

Why don't you use the established meanings of technical terms like "polarity".
Your habit of making stuff up isn't helping anything.

Because I have to dumb it down or you keep saying you don't understand.  It isn't making stuff up, surely the part on adam and eve is not too smart for you to understand?

[guest39538]

Re-written for people who don't understand Metaphor's

The preconditions of the N-field and n-field are that two opposite polarities which we will name ''pos and neg'' , ''pos'' cannot exist without ''neg''.

''neg'' cannot exist without ''pos''

Because a likewise polarity entropy by the laws of physics has to expand.

P.s for those who don't get what a N-field or n-field is, they are the unification of all fields merged into  quantum entangled fields and the equality of polarities of all the fields.

Meaning  in simple terms the common ground for all fields is polarities.

[guest39538]

E=(q-)+(q+)?

[Bored chemist]

What do you think the word "polarity" means?

Do you think that anyone else on Earth uses that word for the same thing you use it for?

[guest39538]

 

What do you think the word "polarity" means?

Do you think that anyone else on Earth uses that word for the same thing you use it for?

I know what a polarity is , i.e a north and south magnetic field polarity or charge polarity, etc,  I think the physics may be something to do with spin ?

[Bored chemist]

OK, So it's something that is N or S.
Now look at this again.

I think not, the field is likewise in polarity all over to itself.

Why do you think it means something?

[Kryptid]

It has already been said that polarity has no magnitude, the question is about the polarity not the charge or magnitude of the field.

The polarity of a field is whether it is positive or negative.

The polarity of one point is the same and likewise to all other points of the field yes?

For an electric field around a negatively-charged particle, yes, the field will have a negative polarity.

[guest39538]

It has already been said that polarity has no magnitude, the question is about the polarity not the charge or magnitude of the field.

The polarity of a field is whether it is positive or negative.

The polarity of one point is the same and likewise to all other points of the field yes?

For an electric field around a negatively-charged particle, yes, the field will have a negative polarity.

Why do you keep changing the question?  the question is about a single polarity field not a field surrounding a negative charged particle .

[Kryptid]

Why do you keep changing the question?  the question is about a single polarity field not a field surrounding a negative charged particle .

Then I don't know what you're talking about. If you have an electric field then you must also have an electrically-charged particle to produce that field.

[guest39538]

Why do you keep changing the question?  the question is about a single polarity field not a field surrounding a negative charged particle .

Then I don't know what you're talking about. If you have an electric field then you must also have an electrically-charged particle to produce that field.

So you can't imagine a void and  a single polarity dark energy trying to manifest?

[Kryptid]

So you can't imagine a void and  a single polarity dark energy trying to manifest?

We don't even know what dark energy is, much less whether it has polarity or not.

[Bored chemist]

trying to manifest

You seem to be writing bad Gothic literature, rather than science.

[guest39538]

trying to manifest

You seem to be writing bad Gothic literature, rather than science.

I just give up, it is like talking to brick walls who do not have the ability to think.

OK let us switch to gases and an isolated gas cloud becomes polarised to a negative polarity.   The cloud expands because every dot in the gas cloud is a likewise polarity.


OK?

[Kryptid]

I just give up, it is like talking to brick walls who do not have the ability to think.

OK let us switch to gases and an isolated gas cloud becomes polarised to a negative polarity.   The cloud expands because every dot in the gas cloud is a likewise polarity.


OK?

A gas cloud where every atom of the cloud has a net negative charge will expand, yes. Such would not be the case for a field, though. Fields don't work like that.

[guest39538]

I just give up, it is like talking to brick walls who do not have the ability to think.

OK let us switch to gases and an isolated gas cloud becomes polarised to a negative polarity.   The cloud expands because every dot in the gas cloud is a likewise polarity.


OK?

A gas cloud where every atom of the cloud has a net negative charge will expand, yes. Such would not be the case for a field, though. Fields don't work like that.

Right ok, I think the penny dropped. You say fields don't work like that, I disagree, if you can now take away the visible  image of the gas cloud and replace it with the image of a field, there is no difference in the physics involved, the polarised field will expand in accordance with the physics involved.

[guest39538]

0a.jpg (3.32 kB . 405x268 - viewed 2826 times)
1b.jpg (10.57 kB . 659x442 - viewed 2801 times)

Just like this, , micro bangs ''exploding'' into wave-energy