[guest39538]

In this experiment the magnetic field being a displacement velocity ether.

Is also the meaningless wibblings of a fruitcake

Well this ''fruitcake'' who as corrected the world on time dilation and shown several other things, must be a fruitcake with the best fruit. No grumpy looking raisins like yourself.

You have corrected the world on nothing. You have merely shared some craziness on various forums.

Really now, then you can challenge me on time and time dilation can you?  Please feel free to start a challenge thread

The onus is on you to show your claim to be true.

Already shown in my paper when I use time planck to show the illusion of length contraction.


tp0.jpg (23.51 kB . 898x572 - viewed 4520 times)

[guest39538]

How about the ''zig zag '' version


tp.jpg (14.7 kB . 985x507 - viewed 3900 times)

[guest39538]

Like I said, you can't challenge me on time because I am the ''master'' on time and space and if Einstein was here today he would concede to me.

[Kryptid]

Like I said, you can't challenge me on time because I am the ''master'' on time and space and if Einstein was here today he would concede to me.

I wish this board had an appropriate emoticon to react to that statement with.

[guest39538]

Tesla thought something could not act on nothing and Einsteins space curvature was wrong.  Tesla thinking there was an electric universe.  Both were correct because none of them considered Q.F.S.

[guest39538]

Like I said, you can't challenge me on time because I am the ''master'' on time and space and if Einstein was here today he would concede to me.

I wish this board had an appropriate emoticon to react to that statement with.

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

[Kryptid]

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

I already did in another thread. I'm getting off of this crazy train.

[guest39538]

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

I already did in another thread. I'm getting off of this crazy train.

Nobody as challenged my notions about time, in fact I have had agreement it is a timing dilation and not a time dilation.

[The Spoon]

In this experiment the magnetic field being a displacement velocity ether.

Is also the meaningless wibblings of a fruitcake

Well this ''fruitcake'' who as corrected the world on time dilation and shown several other things, must be a fruitcake with the best fruit. No grumpy looking raisins like yourself.

You have corrected the world on nothing. You have merely shared some craziness on various forums.

Really now, then you can challenge me on time and time dilation can you?  Please feel free to start a challenge thread

The onus is on you to show your claim to be true.

Already shown in my paper when I use time planck to show the illusion of length contraction.


tp0.jpg (23.51 kB . 898x572 - viewed 4520 times)

Oh interesting. I wasnt aware you had had a paper published...

[The Spoon]

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

I already did in another thread. I'm getting off of this crazy train.

Nobody as challenged my notions about time, in fact I have had agreement it is a timing dilation and not a time dilation.

From who? Some fellow crazy?

[guest39538]

Oh interesting. I wasnt aware you had had a paper published...

It is not published yet because I can't get any real help on it, it is also not finished because I have not finished doing gravity mechanism and other things. It is a huge paper when it is finished that well.....lets just say it is will be very controversial.

[guest39538]

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

I already did in another thread. I'm getting off of this crazy train.

Nobody as challenged my notions about time, in fact I have had agreement it is a timing dilation and not a time dilation.

From who? Some fellow crazy?

Goc I think agreed with me and i think somebody else. I know I am right and I have been told to get my paper peer viewed by a science section in a top political forum.
They said thank you for sharing and they would look forward to seeing the finished article.

I am not crazy , I know I just know when I am 100% correct or not, 

[The Spoon]

Oh interesting. I wasnt aware you had had a paper published...

It is not published yet because I can't get any real help on it, it is also not finished because I have not finished doing gravity mechanism and other things. It is a huge paper when it is finished that well.....lets just say it is will be very controversial.

So you havent written a paper.

[The Spoon]

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

I already did in another thread. I'm getting off of this crazy train.

Nobody as challenged my notions about time, in fact I have had agreement it is a timing dilation and not a time dilation.

From who? Some fellow crazy?

Goc I think agreed with me and i think somebody else. I know I am right and I have been told to get my paper peer viewed by a science section in a top political forum.
They said thank you for sharing and they would look forward to seeing the finished article.

I am not crazy , I know I just know when I am 100% correct or not, 

Yes of course you know you are correct. That is the problem. You evidence is' knowing' you are correct. So can you point to where people 'agreed' with you precisely?
interesting that you say a 'top political forum' agreed but cant tell us which one. Even if you did, do you really think a political forum is the best judge of whether a scientific paper should be published or not?  Why not ask actual scientists?

[guest39538]

Challenge this then?  I know I am right and it can't be challenged.

I already did in another thread. I'm getting off of this crazy train.

Nobody as challenged my notions about time, in fact I have had agreement it is a timing dilation and not a time dilation.

From who? Some fellow crazy?

Goc I think agreed with me and i think somebody else. I know I am right and I have been told to get my paper peer viewed by a science section in a top political forum.
They said thank you for sharing and they would look forward to seeing the finished article.

I am not crazy , I know I just know when I am 100% correct or not, 

Yes of course you know you are correct. That is the problem. You evidence is' knowing' you are correct. So can you point to where people 'agreed' with you precisely?
interesting that you say a 'top political forum' agreed but cant tell us which one. Even if you did, do you really think a political forum is the best judge of whether a scientific paper should be published or not?  Why not ask actual scientists?

I have asked scientists, but who is a scientist on here? who can say they are qualified to peer view? 

See my paper I brought to the top. of section.

[guest39538]

Title -  Quantum N-field theory .

Author - S.P. Leese

Abstract - This paper is a theory of an energy Matrix,  an energy matrix is used to describe the primary source of energy for a system.  This paper is intended to show how the energy of the Universe is formed and powers the Universe. .  Showing that this formation of energy is a construct of two parts. Neither part of the process having the mechanics  to  retain form, without the co-existence of their opposite sign.     A co-existence Matrix that is governed by simultaneous manifestations at the same geometrical point . A co-existence that also explains and answers the mechanics of the gravity process.  Proof's explained using two individual S-Matrices and a single co-existence Matrix. 


 

[guest39538]

I will just leave this here until I need it for thought.


transpose 1.jpg (35.68 kB . 683x451 - viewed 3844 times)

ƒ:a<[m x m x m ]>→a<<[n x n x n]>>

T(a)=>a

ƒ:b<[m x m x m ]>→b<<[n x n x n]>>

T(b)=.>b


ƒ:ab<[m x m x m ]>→ab<<[m x m x m]>>

T(ab)=ab

[guest39538]

Title -  Quantum N-field theory .

Summary -  Explaining Universal process with Matrices and completing Quantum mechanics.

Author - S.P. Leese

Abstract - This paper is a theory of an energy Matrix,  an energy matrix is used to describe the primary source of energy for a system.  This paper is intended to show how the energy of the Universe is formed and powers the Universe. .  Showing that this formation of energy is a construct of two parts. Neither part of the process having the mechanics  to  retain form, without the co-existence of the opposite sign.     A co-existence Matrix that is governed by simultaneous manifestations at the same geometrical point . A co-existence that also explains and answers the mechanics of the gravity process.  Proof's explained using two individual S-Matrices and a single co-existence Matrix.

Introduction.   

The intended reach of this paper is for the more open minded reader.  The aim of the paper is to show ostensible content and a paradox of present information.  Things that are ostensible are extremely difficult to show , things that appear to be true to most people will take some serious convincing the information is otherwise. 
In showing the ostensible content, I hope to also show gravity mechanism by the truer content I provide. The truer content having no ostensible, appearing to be true, because it is true and of axiom values.

Main text

Let us begin and for the  purposes of this discussion, be clear in our minds what I mean by a Matrix.   For the purpose of understanding, I define a Matrix as an invisible box that has X,Y and Z dimensions.  Within the 3-dimensional invisible box is a 3 dimensional array of coordinate values, similar to, but not exactly like the classical "matrix".
 S-Matrix , presently defined as a scatter Matrix , again I define it slightly different in that I will define it a spread Matrix, meaning expansion. Also consider that this is not a maths matrix, it is a schematic Matrix with explanation and directional prompts.
In the Matrix arrangements, I will represent actions with symbols, a sort of symbolic language that represents the physics involved . cause and affect.   To help clarify what the symbolic language means, I will now define the symbol use and sentencing structure.

Expansion = ←→

Contraction = →←

change = Δ

function =  ƒ

Vector direction =  →

Vector direction = ←

S-matrix E_1pos = [a]

S-matrix E_2neg  = b]

Co-existence Matrix E_1pos+E_2neg=[ab]

E_1pos  = energy field mono pole positive sign

E_1neg  = energy field mono pole negative sign

xyz = dimensions

In example sentence structure   ←→a=a    which means the expansion of a is because of a

←→b=b

→←a=b

→←b=a

[guest39538]

I feel like I am working hard to improve, how the hell do I get people to comment?   I am guessing without confirmation or correction.

Does this say it all ?

In example sentence structure   ←→a=a    which means the expansion of a is because of a

←→b=b  which means the expansion of b is because of b


→←a=b  which means the contraction of a is because of b


→←b=a which means the contraction of b is because of a

[guest39538]

S-matrix E1pos = a/k

S-matrix E2neg  = b/k

super co-exist matrix  =  a+b/k

??

S-matrix E1pos λE = a/k


S-matrix E2neg  λE = a+b/k

Super matrix field particle  =  a+b