0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
My argument explains those two forces. So it definitely does not violate it.
I am talking about polarity is the force.
Polarity in general .
I am talking about polarity is the force.Can you rephrase this? The grammar makes it difficult to understand.
Consider polarity as a point of attraction or repulsion.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 01:58:51Consider polarity as a point of attraction or repulsion. Not exactly a typical definition of polarity, given that electric fields are stilled considered to have a polarity even if they are not attracting or repelling anything.
Are they really not attracting anything ?
If an electric field 'E' is made up of elements a + b then the elements remain attractive and repulsive.
The sky does not let harmful rays in because it is repulsive.
Please accept the conceptual definition of Q.F.P , quantum field physicality as observed with magnets.
What experiment has demonstrated that electric fields are made up two elements?
I have no need to because solidity is sufficiently-well explained by existing physics models.
When you measure it to be neutral , 0 charge.
Existing models do not explain the ''fabric'' of space. Einsteins space-time curvature if you like. A body emits a field, the field also has body but not as dense as the source. Fields push back against fields. i.e they have physical body.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 02:17:50When you measure it to be neutral , 0 charge.So it's not true of all electric fields then.QuoteExisting models do not explain the ''fabric'' of space. Einsteins space-time curvature if you like. A body emits a field, the field also has body but not as dense as the source. Fields push back against fields. i.e they have physical body.So what definition of "physical" are you using?
I will leave you with these questions to ask yourself about the diagram. Would a repulse a ? Would b repulse b ? would a be attracted to b ? would b be attracted to a?
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 02:46:25I will leave you with these questions to ask yourself about the diagram. Would a repulse a ? Would b repulse b ? would a be attracted to b ? would b be attracted to a? Without knowing what exactly I'm looking at, I can't answer the questions. What is a? What is b? What is the nucleus? What kind of field is it?
It is an atomic field of two opposite polarities a and b, the nucleus in the diagram is a planet or body.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 10:48:43It is an atomic field of two opposite polarities a and b, the nucleus in the diagram is a planet or body. What is an "atomic field"? Are the polarities electric charge?
I suppose it may be an electrostatic field. Although I like to think all fields are a transformation of this singular field.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/02/2018 18:13:44I suppose it may be an electrostatic field. Although I like to think all fields are a transformation of this singular field. If the fields contain an even distribution of positive and negative charges, then there will be no attraction or repulsion between the two bodies.
Natural electric field of the EarthThunderheads near Borneo, Indonesia are featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 40 crew member on the International Space Station. Credit: M. Justin Wilkinson, Jacobs and Michael Trenchard, Barrios Technology at NASA-JSC.The natural electric field of the Earth refers to the planet Earth having a natural direct current (DC) electric field or potential gradient from the ground upwards to the ionosphere. The static fair-weather electric field in the atmosphere is ~150 volts per meter (V/m) near the Earth's surface, but it drops exponentially with height to under 1 V/m at 30 km altitude, as the conductivity of the atmosphere increases.
That is the ostensible part ''you'' are failing to see. It is the other was around, there would be attraction and there would be repulsion when the objects meet, space not having the density to stop -ve of the objects. There would be no net charge but that does not mean all of sudden the properties of the object stop working. Force does not rely on having a charge, force is force.
QuoteNatural electric field of the EarthThunderheads near Borneo, Indonesia are featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 40 crew member on the International Space Station. Credit: M. Justin Wilkinson, Jacobs and Michael Trenchard, Barrios Technology at NASA-JSC.The natural electric field of the Earth refers to the planet Earth having a natural direct current (DC) electric field or potential gradient from the ground upwards to the ionosphere. The static fair-weather electric field in the atmosphere is ~150 volts per meter (V/m) near the Earth's surface, but it drops exponentially with height to under 1 V/m at 30 km altitude, as the conductivity of the atmosphere increases. Slightly polarised in the denser regions nearer the mass object.
When forces apply in equal and opposite directions, they cancel out.