[Kryptid]

That would be the job for a real scientist not me.  I am only mortal .

So then your claim is just speculation.

[guest39538]

The experiment I did was to replace the semantics of dark matter theory and to post it to see how it went down with the readers.

So not an experiment at all. Just something you thought up. Something you imagined.
[/quo

Please demonstrate that Faraday's electromotive force can replicate the galactic rotation curve data of the galaxy

18 mins in, proof enough for me.

[LB7]

"So you can show us with math what Faraday's electromotive force predicts the velocity of the galaxy's rotation will be at 15 kiloparsecs from its center? Please do."

The force of attraction is a function of cos(a) with a the phase angle. The phase angle depend of the distance and the possibility to the electrostatic force to synchronize the matter at distance.

F=-k*cos(a)

You think like the mass exist, but there is no mass, just an attraction/repulsion. Change the distance, you change the phase angle, so the cosine and the force of attraction.

[guest39538]

"So you can show us with math what Faraday's electromotive force predicts the velocity of the galaxy's rotation will be at 15 kiloparsecs from its center? Please do."

The force of attraction is a function of cos(a) with a the phase angle. The phase angle depend of the distance and the possibility to the electrostatic force to synchronize the matter at distance.

F=k*cos(a)

You think like the mass exist, but there is no mass, just an attraction/repulsion. Change the distance, you change the phase angle, so the cosine and the force of attraction.

but there is no mass, just an attraction/repulsion.

I have been trying to tell them that , I call it the n-field and the repulsion and attraction you are on about is simply polarities of the combined fields.
I do not know the angles you are discussing but you are sounding good to me .

[LB7]

The angle I spoke is the time between two waves from two matters: measure the electrostatic peak from one matter, idem for the second, the difference of time give an angle.

Positive peak from one matter at the same time of the negative peak from the second matter : the angle is 180° cos(angle)=-1 the matters attract each others

Positive peak from one matter at the same time of the positive peak from the second matter : the angle is 0° cos(angle)=1 the matters push each others

Positive peak from one matter at the same time of the 0 peak from the second matter : the angle is 90° cos(angle)=0 the matters don't attrack or push each others

[Kryptid]

18 mins in, proof enough for me.

So at what point in the video was it stated that Faraday's electromotive force was the explanation for the given velocities of different parts of a galaxy? Where was it explained how such a force could keep the velocity of galactic matter constant from about 3 kiloparsecs out despite the fact that the matter is increasingly distant from the galactic core and thus should be slowing down instead of remaining at a constant speed?

"So you can show us with math what Faraday's electromotive force predicts the velocity of the galaxy's rotation will be at 15 kiloparsecs from its center? Please do."

The force of attraction is a function of cos(a) with a the phase angle. The phase angle depend of the distance and the possibility to the electrostatic force to synchronize the matter at distance.

F=-k*cos(a)

You think like the mass exist, but there is no mass, just an attraction/repulsion. Change the distance, you change the phase angle, so the cosine and the force of attraction.

So what is the predicted velocity of galactic rotation 15 kiloparsecs from its center? Show your work.

[LB7]

"So what is the predicted velocity of galactic rotation 15 kiloparsecs from its center? Show your work."

The synchronization depends of the straight velocity. Note, for me there is a global reference of velocity, the velocity deforms the inner "particle" so measure the deformation you will have the true velocity, from 0 to c. And the true velocity will deform the capacity to be in phase, it is like you give only one part of the wave (attaction), the other part (the repulsion) diseappear more and more. You want maths, but the physicians invented dark matter and create an artificial calculation to be true with the reality. I don't know where to start to verified my model but I share here, maybe one physician could be interesting.

And I can explain time. How the mechanics of time works.

[Kryptid]

The synchronization depends of the straight velocity. Note, for me there is a global reference of velocity, the velocity deforms the inner "particle" so measure the deformation you will have the true velocity, from 0 to c. And the true velocity will deform the capacity to be in phase, it is like you give only one part of the wave (attaction), the other part (the repulsion) diseappear more and more.

I don't know where to start to verified my model but I share here, maybe one physician could be interesting.

I don't see any calculations here, so you don't know if your model is correct. It's just speculation.

You want maths, but the physicians invented dark matter...

Physicians came up with dark matter? I figured it would have been physicists...

...and create an artificial calculation to be true with the reality.

The calculations would have at least been plausible, even if their predicted particles haven't been found with certainty yet. If no plausible model of dark matter matched the data, it would have been falsified and discarded. That's not to say that dark matter certainly exists, it's just a good contender (another contending theory being MOND). In order for your theory to be on par with those two, it has to at least be able to match the data.

[The Spoon]

"So what is the predicted velocity of galactic rotation 15 kiloparsecs from its center? Show your work."

The synchronization depends of the straight velocity. Note, for me there is a global reference of velocity, the velocity deforms the inner "particle" so measure the deformation you will have the true velocity, from 0 to c. And the true velocity will deform the capacity to be in phase, it is like you give only one part of the wave (attaction), the other part (the repulsion) diseappear more and more. You want maths, but the physicians invented dark matter and create an artificial calculation to be true with the reality. I don't know where to start to verified my model but I share here, maybe one physician could be interesting.

And I can explain time. How the mechanics of time works.

How the mechanics of time works

They charge £40 per hour for an oil change.

[LB7]

Yes, I don't know if my model is correct. But it is so simple and logical compared to the curvature of spacetime, dark matter, inertia, etc.

I destroy:

Mass
Dark energy
Dark matter
Dark flow
Flyby anomaly
Curvature of spacetime
Inertia
Supermassive blackhole anomaly
Horizon problem
etc.

I have:

An absolute reference of velocity
An absolute reference of time

I don't know a lot about quantic physics but I think a lot of problem can be destroy with my theory.

[LB7]

"They charge £40 per hour for an oil change. " TheSpoon: no, it is like an helice of helicopter, so simple...

[The Spoon]

Yes, I don't know if my model is correct. But it is so simple and logical compared to the curvature of spacetime, dark matter, inertia, etc.

I destroy:

Mass
Dark energy
Dark matter
Dark flow
Flyby anomaly
Curvature of spacetime
Inertia
Supermassive blackhole anomaly
Horizon problem
etc.

I have:

An absolute reference of velocity
An absolute reference of time

I don't know a lot about quantic physics but I think a lot of problem can be destroy with my theory.

What the f** is quantic physics?
I doubt if your model is correct. It sounds like the speculation of a drunk pub scientist.

[LB7]

Yes, I don't know if my model is correct. But it is so simple and logical compared to the curvature of spacetime, dark matter, inertia, etc.

I destroy:

Mass
Dark energy
Dark matter
Dark flow
Flyby anomaly
Curvature of spacetime
Inertia
Supermassive blackhole anomaly
Horizon problem
etc.

I have:

An absolute reference of velocity
An absolute reference of time

I don't know a lot about quantic physics but I think a lot of problem can be destroy with my theory.

What the f** is quantic physics?
I doubt if your model is correct. It sounds like the speculation of a drunk pub scientist.

You doubt and it sounds for you... great science )

[atbsphotography (OP)]

How did this thread turn into a debate about the existence of matter?
Anyone who thinks matter doesn't exist must be on drugs or in need of some psychological help, SIMPLE!
Matter exists or are we made of nothing? Please LB7 explain how we are here if the matter is a figment of imagination and improper science. Explain how we who are made of matter exist if it isn't real?

If mass doesn't exist, nor does matter, and that matter is what everything in the visible universe is made out of and gives it form, and my theory explains how dark matter could do the same and therefore make Dark Planets a possibility.

[guest39538]

How did this thread turn into a debate about the existence of matter?
Anyone who thinks matter doesn't exist must be on drugs or in need of some psychological help, SIMPLE!
Matter exists or are we made of nothing? Please LB7 explain how we are here if the matter is a figment of imagination and improper science. Explain how we who are made of matter exist if it isn't real?

If mass doesn't exist, nor does matter, and that matter is what everything in the visible universe is made out of and gives it form, and my theory explains how dark matter could do the same and therefore make Dark Planets a possibility.

Where does anyone say that matter does not exist? 

[guest39538]

I destroy:

Mass
Dark energy
Dark matter
Dark flow
Flyby anomaly
Curvature of spacetime
Inertia
Supermassive blackhole anomaly
Horizon problem
etc.

At this time your idea is not developed or explained enough to destroy anything.  You must try  much harder with your writing and explanations.

[The Spoon]

Yes, I don't know if my model is correct. But it is so simple and logical compared to the curvature of spacetime, dark matter, inertia, etc.

I destroy:

Mass
Dark energy
Dark matter
Dark flow
Flyby anomaly
Curvature of spacetime
Inertia
Supermassive blackhole anomaly
Horizon problem
etc.

I have:

An absolute reference of velocity
An absolute reference of time

I don't know a lot about quantic physics but I think a lot of problem can be destroy with my theory.

What the f** is quantic physics?
I doubt if your model is correct. It sounds like the speculation of a drunk pub scientist.

You doubt and it sounds for you... great science )

Sorry? I do not understand what you have written. It makes no sense.

[LB7]

How did this thread turn into a debate about the existence of matter?
Anyone who thinks matter doesn't exist must be on drugs or in need of some psychological help, SIMPLE!
Matter exists or are we made of nothing? Please LB7 explain how we are here if the matter is a figment of imagination and improper science. Explain how we who are made of matter exist if it isn't real?

If mass doesn't exist, nor does matter, and that matter is what everything in the visible universe is made out of and gives it form, and my theory explains how dark matter could do the same and therefore make Dark Planets a possibility.

I didn't say the matter doen't exist, just the mass. You feel a weight, so you think there is a mass but not, it is an electromagnetic attraction followed by an elecmagnetic repulsion and the sum is not zero, the frequency of attraction/repulsion is very high so you fell the mean. The law is well in 1/d². And I think it is the electrostatic origin that can synchronized all the matter (or not if the distance is very high), the law is 1/d³. The matter exists for me, and each part of matter is an electrostatic rotor, and these rotors synchronized themselves at distance. The electrostatic rotor create an electromagnetic push/pull so we feel gravity, we see the effect of gravity but it is an attraction/repulsion at a high frequency.