[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

As per sketch a 2 meter long tube is mounted on the left arm of a seesaw and this see saw is balanced due to counterweight.there is a 10 kg mass ball located in the in rest position in the tube.
See the link.

Now seesaw is balanced at 180 degree angle.when I tilt it this balanced seesaw then the ball fall down from 2 meter height and hit with upper part of tube .but interesting after hitting the seesaw will get back it's initial position without any external influence.so ball will again fall from 2 meter height.in this way the ball will fall down twicely but the main interesting point is that the input energy is almost zero as there is no torque due to counterweight.
There will be a lock mechanism to prevent the falling of counterweight at the time of tilting.
The ball will fall down after getting a certain angle as a pin will work to hold the ball to prevent it from sliding along tube at the time of tilting.
If there is no energy as a input as seesaw is balanced and torque is same then output is ,using mgh formula
Mgh= 10*10*2=200 joule at the time of tilting.
Mgh=10*10*2=200 joule at the time of reversing.

So total output is 400 joule but input will be almost free due to equilibrium position of seesaw.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

This is a challenge for everyone.i have consulted with many experts but all are confused.

[Kryptid]

when I tilt it this balanced seesaw

There's your problem. Using your hand to tilt it is putting energy into the system. In the video, each time you want to make the ball move, you have to push the device with your hand. Make a version which doesn't require that step and then we can talk.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

I have proven what I want to prove(overunity).
If a seesaw is balanced then there will be need of almost 0 energy to tilt it at any degree.furthermore I have already mentioned that a pin will work to hold the ball and ball will fall down after getting a certain angle.
I will extract energy of falling ball ,using two piston generator mounted on each side of long tube an this energy will work to feed a lever system which will work to tilt it again and again.
Ok .tell me input and output.
But remember that seesaw is in equilibrium position if you are calculating input .
Tell me difference between input and output.
I'm ready to give up.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

The Box,you are considering yourself not less than Einstein but talking like in this way as if it is a very complex design.it is simple design.so I don't think there is a need of proving it more.
But I would like to tell you that I don't have resources to build it completely.if you could help me to build it then it will be a welcome step as there is a need of team work.

[Bored chemist]

I'm ready to give up.

That's good, because you are wasting your time (and ours).

[Bored chemist]

I don't think there is a need of proving it more.

You couldn't prove it less.
When you set it up and walk away, and it keeps going- forever- you will have proved it.

[Petrochemicals]

These things always get me, ones where the motion is the show piece. Many things affect such bodies, magnetism grav8tational pull rotation of the earth,  gravity of the sun. Have you considered these ?

https://www.scribd.com/doc/74784234/Gyro-Compass

[Kryptid]

The Box,you are considering yourself not less than Einstein but talking like in this way as if it is a very complex design.it is simple design.so I don't think there is a need of proving it more.
But I would like to tell you that I don't have resources to build it completely.if you could help me to build it then it will be a welcome step as there is a need of team work.

You are mistaken if you think that the quote in my signature came from me.

[Bored chemist]

The Box,you are considering yourself not less than Einstein

Thebox has not posted in this thread.

[jeffreyH]

You must have stood on the shoulders of giants. Then fell off and bashed your head.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

I would like to know if a seesaw system is in equilibrium position then the torque will be same on both arm of seesaw.all of you are ignoring this valid fact.it doesn't matter that the ball is below fulcrum as system is balanced due to counterweight.that's why there is no need to adding energy in the system.so all gravitational forces,magnetism,and sun rotation will work same on both side of seesaw and required energy ( input)will be almost free to tilt it .
There is nothing beyond the formula of kinetic energy and this formula is proving overunity in it.
So no one can challenge it.
I have asked all of you that tell me input and output.
I am not wasting anyone's time.i am presenting it on the basis of pure physics..

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

If there is no overunity in this mechanism then all of you are proving the formula of kinetic energy wrong yourself.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

I again insist that there is no need of adding energy in this mechanism as it is balanced due to counterweight and if there is doubt then all of you test it .all doubts will be cleared immediately regarding input and output.

[Kryptid]

So no one can challenge it.

So finish your device and go get your Nobel Prize already. Take out a loan to build it if you have to. If the device is as fool-proof as you claim, then you'll quickly and easily make all of your money back many times over for providing an unlimited, nonpolluting energy source to the world.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

I have added counterweight more so if ball is 2 meter below from fulcrum then there will be no need of adding I put energy or lifting up the device due to counterweight.
This one point is working to get overunity in this mechanism.
Take it very seriously and make efforts to build it completely as a team work and collaboration.

[Kryptid]

Take it very seriously and make efforts to build it completely as a team work and collaboration.

Your design looks pretty simple. Why would you need a team of people to build it? You could probably find everything you needed at a hardware store.

[vkrmvkrm 11 (OP)]

You are correct but I think two is better than one.but its ok.i try it.

[The Spoon]

This is a challenge for everyone.i have consulted with many experts but all are confused.

What 'experts'?

[The Spoon]

I have proven what I want to prove(overunity).
If a seesaw is balanced then there will be need of almost 0 energy to tilt it at any degree.furthermore I have already mentioned that a pin will work to hold the ball and ball will fall down after getting a certain angle.
I will extract energy of falling ball ,using two piston generator mounted on each side of long tube an this energy will work to feed a lever system which will work to tilt it again and again.
Ok .tell me input and output.
But remember that seesaw is in equilibrium position if you are calculating input .
Tell me difference between input and output.
I'm ready to give up.

You may have 'proven what you ant to prove', but you have failed to show convincingly to anybody else that this is valid. It is for you to tell the difference between input and output as it is your idea. Why should we? We get perpetual energy loonies on here every week.