0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Thebox on 10/03/2018 12:22:26My subjective opinion is has valid has much as the next persons subjective thoughts.No it does not.The next person may know what they are talking about, but you don't.You seem to not grasp the difference between reasoned speculation, founded in fact and made up bull.
My subjective opinion is has valid has much as the next persons subjective thoughts.
Oh you mean like time dilation hey, that I had to put science straight on.
Quote from: Thebox on 10/03/2018 12:31:11Oh you mean like time dilation hey, that I had to put science straight on. Nobody (except you) believes that you did that.
You are quite right. Physics cares about objective evidence and rational deduction.The objective fact is that the GPS system works.It wouldn't work if we had got time dilation wrong.So your ideas- fall into one of two categories. Either they give the same answer as GR, or they are wrong.
If you think being objectively correct makes me look bad, you are on the wrong website.
Quote from: Thebox on 10/03/2018 02:05:32 within this point is an entire universeGot any evidence for that?
within this point is an entire universe
Made up pictures are not evidence.
There is a lot of things made up about BH's, so interpret a BH my own way.
They are not made up pictures, I took them this morning with my conceptual camera. Method 1) look between the distant stars2) take a conceptual picture 3) diagnose that picture 4) develop an objective conclusion as a hard copy.
Quote from: Thebox on 10/03/2018 11:43:56There is a lot of things made up about BH's, so interpret a BH my own way. Your interpretation is inconsistent with both the mathematical and physical evidence. If black holes didn't have a gravitational pull beyond their horizon, then gravitationally-bound pairs of black holes and normal stars wouldn't exist. Yet we have detected them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_X-1, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V404_Cygni.Quote from: Thebox on 10/03/2018 15:22:04They are not made up pictures, I took them this morning with my conceptual camera. Method 1) look between the distant stars2) take a conceptual picture 3) diagnose that picture 4) develop an objective conclusion as a hard copy.What in the world does that have to do with the idea of an entire universe somehow existing inside of a singularity?
. In layman's terms, it is defined as the shell of "points of no return", i.e., the points at which the gravitational pull becomes so great as to make escape impossible,
There is no singularity in infinite.
My interpretation of an infinite universe is has valued as your finite interpretation.
Also it is contradiction to the definition of event horizon, my interpretation is objectively correct of an event horizon.
Infinite... what?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/03/2018 15:12:46Made up pictures are not evidence.They are not made up pictures, I took them this morning with my conceptual camera. Method 1) look between the distant stars2) take a conceptual picture 3) diagnose that picture 4) develop an objective conclusion as a hard copy. Added - Unless you want to suggest that the darkness between the stars is a firmament?
Quote from: Thebox on 10/03/2018 15:22:04Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/03/2018 15:12:46Made up pictures are not evidence.They are not made up pictures, I took them this morning with my conceptual camera. Method 1) look between the distant stars2) take a conceptual picture 3) diagnose that picture 4) develop an objective conclusion as a hard copy. Added - Unless you want to suggest that the darkness between the stars is a firmament? That's the sort of delusion that makes me suggest it's time to get medical help.