The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?

  • 11 Replies
  • 3263 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« on: 23/03/2018 10:04:26 »
I know I am going to be shot down left right and centre for suggesting this question, as it almost hearkens on biblical proportions, yet, "if the next quantum leap of theory revolves around a technological discovery that revolves around a science that challenges the a-priori definitions of space and time we're use to, and believe me we're doing all we can, if the next step is the end for "old/contemporary" science and in with the new, then what are the problems there for "old-science" given the new technological step that would "hypothetically" (and this is just a question, not a statement of fact yet) warrant a new approach to energy generation and propulsion systems?"

For instance, would "old-science" hold back the findings to gradually implement the new findings, the "new science", into their research work? Or, go into a meltdown? This is a "worst case scenario" question for anyone not expecting a new a-priori for the red-shift, the CMBR, and FTL, and associated model of time and space. But if there was one, promoting a technology of energy and propulsion current science can't explain with their models, would there be restrictions in play, and if so what?

For instance, what agency is responsible for outlining the future of scientific progress? Then, do they have projections and protocols in play for "major" steps forward?

It must be noted that the last time we went through a renaissance of science was during the last two world wars in which context it was all hands on deck without worrying about a "general" global scientific community.

What if this new science gave us the breathing space we don't have with contemporary science, with Earth? Does it become a game of what "works best"? Or, is it something more fundamental?
« Last Edit: 23/03/2018 12:46:21 by opportunity »
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 



Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #1 on: 24/03/2018 02:31:16 »
Ok, what if I said the following:

What will happen to humanity if we discover a TOE, a theory of everything, and thus presumably a way to link gravity with EM (electromagnetism) "according to" the big bang and thus a universe full of stars we can presumably explore?

Star Trek? Seriously?

The "way" we have handled the CMBR, red shift effect, big bang, and supposed FTL is "not very imaginative".....its pitchfork logic.....and its asking us to spend billions on things we can't prove, can't get to, can't actualy demonstrate.....its asking our best minds to focus on, dare I say it, what will always amount to "apparaitions". The stars are out of reach, periord, unless FTL is real. Period.

(I'm screen-shooting this for future reference)

« Last Edit: 24/03/2018 02:39:59 by opportunity »
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #2 on: 24/03/2018 02:55:06 »
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 02:31:16
What will happen to humanity if we discover a TOE, a theory of everything, and thus presumably a way to link gravity with EM (electromagnetism) "according to" the big bang and thus a universe full of stars we can presumably explore?

That depends a lot on the details of the working theory. There's certainly no guarantee that it will let us control gravity, warp space or move faster than light.
Logged
 

Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #3 on: 24/03/2018 03:13:45 »
So looking for alien life that can presumably do that, do FTL, makes us feel a little useless with our own TOE?

You know, let's go star trek, and ask the "galactic federation" <I know> "who has the best TOE"? Is it based on technological advancement? That's so dumb though.
« Last Edit: 24/03/2018 03:23:15 by opportunity »
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #4 on: 24/03/2018 04:52:34 »
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 03:13:45
So looking for alien life that can presumably do that, do FTL, makes us feel a little useless with our own TOE?

You know, let's go star trek, and ask the "galactic federation" <I know> "who has the best TOE"? Is it based on technological advancement? That's so dumb though.

Who said anything about looking for aliens with superluminal technology? Sublight aliens would be a nice discovery too.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #5 on: 24/03/2018 11:57:01 »
Science will continue to follow where the evidence leads.
Individual scientists may get upset about it, but science will keep going just fine.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #6 on: 24/03/2018 12:13:35 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 24/03/2018 04:52:34
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 03:13:45
So looking for alien life that can presumably do that, do FTL, makes us feel a little useless with our own TOE?

You know, let's go star trek, and ask the "galactic federation" <I know> "who has the best TOE"? Is it based on technological advancement? That's so dumb though.

Who said anything about looking for aliens with superluminal technology? Sublight aliens would be a nice discovery too.

That's only possible from within this solar system. Do the math. Seriously, scientists, good scientists, have done that math.
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #7 on: 24/03/2018 12:16:50 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/03/2018 11:57:01
Science will continue to follow where the evidence leads.
Individual scientists may get upset about it, but science will keep going just fine.

I agree. Knowing how all this stuff works poses more questions than answers when it comes to the matter of "handling" that power with fellow humans.
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #8 on: 24/03/2018 13:30:42 »
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 12:13:35
That's only possible from within this solar system. Do the math. Seriously, scientists, good scientists, have done that math.

What's only possible from within this Solar System? Finding aliens? Why would we have to be within this Solar System to find aliens?
Logged
 



Offline opportunity (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #9 on: 24/03/2018 14:50:07 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 24/03/2018 13:30:42
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 12:13:35
That's only possible from within this solar system. Do the math. Seriously, scientists, good scientists, have done that math.

What's only possible from within this Solar System? Finding aliens? Why would we have to be within this Solar System to find aliens?

It's like you're asking why Swiss cheese has holes and why holes are in Swiss cheese.

Have you done the math?

Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #10 on: 24/03/2018 19:58:03 »
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 14:50:07
It's like you're asking why Swiss cheese has holes and why holes are in Swiss cheese.

Have you done the math?

The math for what? As in the other thread, I'm having trouble understanding what you mean.
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Is a "new science" possible in not forgetting "current science"?
« Reply #11 on: 25/03/2018 09:52:06 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 24/03/2018 19:58:03
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 14:50:07
It's like you're asking why Swiss cheese has holes and why holes are in Swiss cheese.

Have you done the math?

The math for what? As in the other thread, I'm having trouble understanding what you mean.
I have to agree, I’m also having difficulty with these, presumed, ‘deep insights’. Also, in the context of the earlier discussion:

Quote from: Kryptid on 24/03/2018 13:30:42
Quote from: opportunity on 24/03/2018 12:13:35
That's only possible from within this solar system. Do the math. Seriously, scientists, good scientists, have done that math.

What's only possible from within this Solar System? Finding aliens? Why would we have to be within this Solar System to find aliens?

The response: “It's like you're asking why Swiss cheese has holes and why holes are in Swiss cheese.“ is a response that would do the Box proud.
Look out Box, you’ve got competition here.

On the other hand there may be some deep meaning here that we are missing, i await enlightenment.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.652 seconds with 51 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.