The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Is kinetic energy absolute ?
4 Replies
3408 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Petrochemicals
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
3629
Activity:
7.5%
Thanked: 182 times
forum overlord
Is kinetic energy absolute ?
«
on:
25/03/2018 17:21:16 »
As in this you tube video
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DqV4xVAYCK8Q&ved=0ahUKEwim0JDy7ofaAhWGblAKHSW7DLQQo7QBCB4wAQ&usg=AOvVaw2XOw1TrjMQ_8qb3RS68JfP
The ball destroys the bat. If it where the other way around would the bat destroy the ball or is the ball just harder ? Is it pressure causing this as the bat is supported by air at the same static relative position as it ? Why does the static air pressure not destroy the ball ? Or does the ball actually have a greater kinetic energy and therefor an absolute content of higher energy staus that is contrary to the concepts of relative force and equal and opposite force ? They are meeting head on ie 180 ?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
Colin2B
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6476
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 708 times
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
«
Reply #1 on:
25/03/2018 18:38:19 »
Looking at the video, the ball appears to disintegrate. I’ve done same with candle fired out of a musket at a board, it punches a hole, but then it is mush.
If you could move the bat at the same speed the ball was moving and hit a stationary ball, then the same would happen. Trick is to get them moving fast enough so the ball doesn’t collapse before it gets through.
«
Last Edit: 25/03/2018 18:41:45 by
Colin2B
»
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
wolfekeeper
Naked Science Forum King!
1678
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 79 times
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
«
Reply #2 on:
26/03/2018 01:46:02 »
FWIW kinetic energy is not absolute. Kinetic energy is relative to the frame of reference. If the bat is moving then you get completely different kinetic energy than if the ball is moving. But for any reference frame energy is conserved within that frame.
Logged
Petrochemicals
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
3629
Activity:
7.5%
Thanked: 182 times
forum overlord
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
«
Reply #3 on:
27/03/2018 22:39:06 »
Thank youcolin. You know i put that video on there without watching 5he slow mo. Some of the do not bother. Watching a few more videos there is an element of thermal heating explained in it alot like shaped metallic charges. The ping pong ball heats to desrtructive temeratures. I know its not got the rodelement, but the bat is too thin for that.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RQP9Qprqio
Do you think the other way a bat would efen survive 1000mph, or disintegrate before it hit ? Still amazes me though.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
Petrochemicals
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
3629
Activity:
7.5%
Thanked: 182 times
forum overlord
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
«
Reply #4 on:
27/03/2018 22:58:52 »
Yup, at 1.44 in in this video of a rail gun you can see how thenprojectile dimishes itself over inpacts, fire and shrinkage said the vicar.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PItPL7EZEc
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...