The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is kinetic energy absolute ?

  • 4 Replies
  • 3409 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« on: 25/03/2018 17:21:16 »
As in this you tube video

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DqV4xVAYCK8Q&ved=0ahUKEwim0JDy7ofaAhWGblAKHSW7DLQQo7QBCB4wAQ&usg=AOvVaw2XOw1TrjMQ_8qb3RS68JfP

The ball destroys the bat. If it where the other way around would the bat destroy the ball or is the ball just harder ?  Is it pressure causing this as the bat is supported by air at the same static relative position as it ? Why does the static air pressure not destroy the ball ? Or does the ball actually have a greater kinetic energy and therefor an absolute content of higher energy staus that is contrary to the concepts of relative force and equal and opposite force ? They are meeting head on ie 180 ? 
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« Reply #1 on: 25/03/2018 18:38:19 »
Looking at the video, the ball appears to disintegrate. I’ve done same with candle fired out of a musket at a board, it punches a hole, but then it is mush.
If you could move the bat at the same speed the ball was moving and hit a stationary ball, then the same would happen. Trick is to get them moving fast enough so the ball doesn’t collapse before it gets through.
« Last Edit: 25/03/2018 18:41:45 by Colin2B »
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1678
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 79 times
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« Reply #2 on: 26/03/2018 01:46:02 »
FWIW kinetic energy is not absolute. Kinetic energy is relative to the frame of reference. If the bat is moving then you get completely different kinetic energy than if the ball is moving. But for any reference frame energy is conserved within that frame.
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« Reply #3 on: 27/03/2018 22:39:06 »
Thank youcolin. You know i put that video on there without watching 5he slow mo. Some of the do not bother. Watching a few more videos there is an element of thermal heating explained in it alot like shaped metallic charges. The ping pong ball heats to desrtructive temeratures. I know its not got the rodelement, but the bat is too thin for that.


Do you think the other way a bat would efen survive 1000mph, or disintegrate before it hit ? Still amazes me though.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Is kinetic energy absolute ?
« Reply #4 on: 27/03/2018 22:58:52 »
Yup, at 1.44 in in this video of a rail gun you can see how thenprojectile dimishes itself over inpacts, fire and shrinkage said the vicar.

Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.315 seconds with 36 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.