[captcass]

You are welcome to your opinions. As I said, I am thru discussing this with you.

[Kryptid]

You are welcome to your opinions.

What I have said isn't an opinion. That's like arguing that, "the Earth is round" is an opinion.

[captcass]

You are quite wrong. You quote theories as fact, like most people caught up in LCDM ideologies and the Standard Model.

There are those who do not believe energy has to be conserved, especially at the quantum level where "Particle" events just pop into and out of existence.

So, you are welcome to your theories and opinions.... 

[Kryptid]

You quote theories as fact

Don't mistake a theorem for a theory. Theorems, unlike theories, are necessarily true so long as their baseline assumptions are true. That's what Noether's theorem is (which is about conservation laws). So long as as the local space is static, Noether's theorem holds.

There are those who do not believe energy has to be conserved, especially at the quantum level where "Particle" events just pop into and out of existence.

That doesn't violate conservation of energy because the total energy of the system remains constant.

[captcass]

I am very sad I must make this post, but I find I now must do so, even though I have been hoping things would be different by now.

After my paper was published in the Journal of Cosmology, I became the webmaster, Public Information Officer and acted as the defacto managing editor, receiving and screening papers before I forwarded them to the Editor-in-Chief and Executive Editor.

Unfortunately, the Executive Editor, Carl Gibson, who is in his mid-80's, is having what one could politely call "end of life issues". As the server account where the journal is hosted is in his name, he has managed to gain total control of the journal and has begun deleting papers he feels do not belong in the journal, even though the papers went through the review process and the authors had paid their Reviewer and Publication fees.

Needless to say, this is causing great consternation for the Editor-in-Chief, Rudloph Schild, who is struggling to find a solution to the problem.

I have been targeted by Carl because I refused to post a political rant by him, at the insistence of Rudolph Schild, who, of course, does not want political papers in the journal. It is currently the only paper in Vol. 27, which used to be dedicated to my model of the universe.

Today he had his new assistant webmaster change the name of my paper so the remaining links to it in Vol. 26, where it first appeared, do not work.

6/26 update:
They restored my link within the journal on 6/26. The new link is http://journalofcosmology.com/JOC26/General_Relativity_and_Effects_in_Time_as_Causation_JofC.pdf

The paper can always be found through a link from my thetruecosmology.com site and directly through this link here: https://www.thetruecosmology.com/General%20Relativity%20and%20Effects%20in%20Time%20as%20Causation.pdf. This is the pre-journal version which contains spiritual verbiage in the "Origins of Spacetime" section that Prof. Schild had me remove or modify for the journal version.

I am asking everyone to not trash the Journal of Cosmology due to these problems, but I suggest no one send in fees or submit papers until the situation has been resolved. It is a sad situation, more than anything else, and all papers will be restored once the situation is resolved.

[Annabelle]

I think its correct answer by "alancalverd"

[captcass]

Regarding my last post, one of the papers removed from the Journal of Cosmology, by Franklin N. Williams of the Theory Research Institute, is a Mathematical Way to Derive Values for the Universal Constants relating them to the fine structure constant alpha, (a), as a Continuous Equation Involving pi,(π), and the Square Root of 10, The fine structure constant, a, is an integral part of all constants involving mass and matter, if not in whole, then in part or exponential fractions. The only constants lacking the fine structure constant are the "elementary charge, 'e'", and the "permeability of a vacuum, 'µo'". It is also apparent that, according to the 2014 NIST values for all the universal constants, if alpha changes over time, then so will all the universal constants change proportionally. The changes range from one tenth to three one-thousandths, or smaller, of one percent of the values found in the 2014 CODATA Bulletin.

This is a significant paper and the Editors at the Journal of Cosmology desperately wanted it back, but everything came to a halt at the Journal of Cosmology due to the issues with the Executive Editor.

I finally told Frank I would put it up on my thetruecosmology site and do a press release for him (my astrophysicist/astronomer email list is extensive, as is my newspaper editor list).

When he said OK, and I thought about it, I thought his paper would be better in a journal so I began the Journal of Modern Cosmology on 8/28, to Explore Alternatives to the Big Bang, LCDM/CDM and Standard Model Cosmologies. It is peer reviewed and free and open access to all. I began it with just the latest version of my paper and Frank's paper as they were both peer reviewed and accepted by the Journal of Cosmology. The new journal can be found here: https://www.journalofmoderncosmology.com . 

I have also done a 36 minute video explaining some of the aspects of my model. https://www.thetruecosmology.com . 

[captcass]

.I finally figured out the math for orbital velocities, both planetary and galactic. It took me so long because I was looking at it the wrong way. This is it and I have now updated my paper to reflect the change. I was right in that particles are going faster due to the rate of time, but was not right that the velocities were the result of the acceleration in time, but rather that slower densities are being dragged forward by time, which evolves the continuum forward at c. The relationship is not from the surface of the Sun out, but from the invariant second looking in. This is because time evolves the continuum forward at c, and the slower the time of a density, the more velocity it needs to keep up in the continuum.
 
Since orbital velocity, V_O, = √(GM/R), the time dilation formula for orbital velocities is derived from the gravitational time dilation formula,
T₀ = T√1 – (2GM/Rc²) by substituting V_O for GM/R, i.e.:
T₀ = T√1 – ((2/c²)(V_O)), resulting in:
V_O = √2*√((Tc² – T₀c²)/2T)), where T is the distant observer’s invariant rate of universal time, T₀ is the rate of time of the coordinate point within the pit, and √2 is the gravitational acceleration factor.

This formula gives exact results for the planets and also applies to spiral galaxies, as I now explain in my paper in the Galactic & Planetary Orbital Velocities section on the thetruecosmolgy.com site.

3/16/21 Update: I just figured out yesterday that this formula (√2*√((Tc² – T₀c²)/2T))/(√3) gives the Sun's galactic rotation velocity, so this is the correct formula for galactic velocities. I used the Sun's surface dilation factor for the solution.

I explain the significance of √2 and √3 in the paper, which is at http://www.thetruecosmology.com.

5/3/21 Update
I updated the paper to reflect the fact that since T = 1, the equations reduce to:
V = √(c² – T₀c²) for planetary orbital velocities and,
V = √((c² – T₀c²))/(√3) for galactic rotation velocities

5/15/2021 Update
The planetary formula also works for moons when the planet's dilation gradient is used.

Also, I updated the paper to show that a spiral galaxy is a "Cosmic Hurricane", a vortex in time that spins the CMB, generating the MECO's magnetic field and generating gravity waves in accordance with the Fibonacci sequence. The spiral arms are densities where time is slower and the spaces between the spirals are faster time. This is also true of a hurricane on Earth, where the bands of rain, which also follow the Fibonacci sequence, are also densities with slower time than the spaces between the bands. So, what we are seeing is systems within systems within systems based upon the Fibonacci sequence.

5/23/2021 Update
For cometary velocities, it is necessary to derive the time dilation velocity formula from the Vis-Viva equation, which is:
V_Oc = √((2*(c2 – T₀c2) – (c2 – T_0αc2))
Where T₀ = the rate of time factor for “r” in the Vis-Viva equation and T_0α = the rate of time factor for a distance equal to the length of the semi-major axis, α.
   Since this is the derivation for the Vis-Viva formula, it is the exact solution for any stellar system body when using the dilation gradient of the central mass of the stellar or planetary system.

5/26/2021 Update:
Now that we know that √(GM/r) = √(c² – c²T₀), we can make that substitution in other equations.
 
Deriving the gravitational force, in Newtons, through time dilation, we use Newton’s equation: F = G(M₁m₂)/r = (GM₁/r)*(m₂/r) = (√(c² – c²*T_o)²*(m₂/r) = ((m₂)(c² – c²T_o))/r, where T_o is the rate of time factor for the coordinate mass, m₂. Of course, the equation works in the obverse for the other mass, M₁.

[captcass]

I don't know if people following a thread are notified when a post is updated, so I am just posting this to call attention to the updates to my last post that contain the time dilation formulas for the velocities of all orbiting bodies and for galactic rotation velocities. I have now also derived the time dilation formula for the force of gravity in Newtons.

If you have previously downloaded my paper, be sure to hit the refresh button after downloading it again to be sure you are getting the current version and not the cached one on your computer.

Since 3/8/21, when I sent them the first formula,75% of the astrophysicists/astronomers in the world's English-speaking universities have now downloaded my paper

6/5/21 Update:
As of today, 100% of the astrophysicists/astronomers on my list have downloaded the paper; 82 % completely, and the rest partially.