The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is the vacuum considered to have negative energy?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is the vacuum considered to have negative energy?

  • 3 Replies
  • 2425 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Is the vacuum considered to have negative energy?
« on: 24/04/2018 13:08:49 »
One of Stephen Hawking's views was that the big bang caused an equal amount of positive and negative energy. Where is the negative energy?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is the vacuum considered to have negative energy?
« Reply #1 on: 24/04/2018 14:19:17 »
I've always read that the negative energy was in the form of gravitational potential energy.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Is the vacuum considered to have negative energy?
« Reply #2 on: 24/04/2018 19:05:25 »
If that were the case there would be an equivalent negative mass associated with the gravitational field. Electromagnetism could be defined as a positive energy proton and a negative energy electron. That wouldn't make it true. Negative energy is likely linked to the expansion of the universe and which is repulsive in nature.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Is the vacuum considered to have negative energy?
« Reply #3 on: 25/04/2018 06:05:46 »
Another point on this subject. Choice of coordinates matter. If there are two large bodies, with a smaller one in between, and all lie on the z axis, we can define one object to be in the positive momentum direction and the other in the negative momentum direction. Relating this to potential and kinetic energies does not indicate negative energy. Negative energy would relate to mass energy.

Having E = mc^2 implies -E = -mc^2. You could say that it is a negative speed rather than the mass that gives negative energy. That is when things are moving away from each other. Hence negative energy indicates an expanding universe.
« Last Edit: 25/04/2018 06:11:10 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.242 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.