0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Think more like two toy boats whose paths cross. This disturbance (interference) is like the virtual particle.
As an indication of what wave disturbances can be like take a look at the following on grid waves.http://www.waitwow.com/grid-waves-along-french-coastline/
This is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post.
Would you be opposed to it if I suggested a rewording of that to say, light wave energy and quantum gravitational wave energy could be potentially infinite in time and space? Then we might be able to get on the same page.
Reply #47The new mystery involves the explanation for gravitational wave energy that fills all space, …
The simplest answer to penetrating a -0 potential barrier in space/time is found within quantum itself. Quantum tunneling may be an illusion of quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement a single potential existing in separate time/space local. lol
Virtual electron-positron pairs production in a zero sum vacuum energy environment. The creation of virtual particles produces a mutual gravity that results in their mutual annihilation.A -0 is a rounded number approaching zero. -0 approaching infinity. Cosmic inflation is driven by virtual pair annihilation. Dark matter membranes (-0) are conducive parameters in containing a vacuum energy environment. lol
I apologize! lol. But, if wave fronts peak at convergence they must have a barrier that produces a path for convergence. to be rejected from. Without a barrier for two spiral wave fronts to converge, waves would simply converge with each other or. diverge from each other. I question whether intertwined waves of light and gravity could produce a strata barrier capable of not absorbing but rejecting light. The scattering of light waves in the slit test, requires a barrier. Even then the product of a peak is the result of the scattering of two waves in a bell formation. The slit test, due to it's limited confine area, only demonstrates light reacting in an observable confined setting. Light concentration in a larger setting wouldn't produce the same results. The scattering effect would void any confined area results. So,. without a barrier, two converging light wave would dissipate, scatter or assimilate in all directions as its does in nature; the sum of the two waves would have no basis to accumulate.
Would a 3D spherically expanding wave front carry energy through space, equally in all directions, with the amount of energy being carried by the entire spherical wave front remaining unchanged, but with the amount of energy gradually declining at each point across the entire wave front in proportion to the inverse square law?
At some point change in the initial force cannot be maintained. The elongation of light waves in space diminishes intensity. A gamma wave could theoretically be stretched to it's limits over a billion years and be seen by us as a blip. A spherical wave is still constrained by gravity as such it is under the auspicious of the strength of that particular gravitational force. Is the cause for the elongation of light waves a product of its strength at the time of release eg: super nova, the gravitational force restraining it, or the pull of an expanding Universe? lol
1) Do you think that there is some distance beyond that at which the blip of light will fade in intensity to the point that there is no visible energy left in the wave front for an observer to see?Light travels at the speed of light in a vacuum, or if it is contained via black hole gravity or via human experimentation then it's speed is altered. An altered velocity indicates light's life cycle duration is like anything else in nature. Some light photons may last to 10 to the 18th power but some may not last half that time. Our estimate of the age of the Universe is 14 billions years, that is minute in comparison to 10 to the 18th power. Photons do and can decay into lighter particles. #1 yes2) Do you think that there is some distance beyond that where there is no energy left at all in the wave front, i.e., where the expanding wave front of energy is diminished to zero, meaning that the wave energy is completely absorbed by the composition of the interstellar medium?Then, for talking purposes, let’s assume that the spherical light wave is advancing into otherwise empty space, no ISM at all. Light is observable as a reflection to a barrier if there is nothing to reflect it, it's presence is obscure. Do i believe that a wave front loses its integrity via a lack of mass? lol.My previous example to you however in regards to light elongation was for a gamma ray which is more of a highly concentrated beam of light. Being such, it's origin is not spherical but Birkeland current like. Gamma rays in this notable form, originate from the center of galaxies, is their observable, visible mass finite? Yes, they appears to be. Does this preclude that their energy dissipates without their mass husk? No, but their mass husk are traveling at approx. the speed of light. We do know that neutrino proceed gamma ray burst. What relation is there between lighter particles neutrinos acceleration and photons traveling at the speed of light? Decaying photons! lol. Decaying photons releasing into neutrinos lift the speed of light limits for neutrinos! lol. So, photonic mass is containable by gravity, neutrinos are not. I do believe that dark matter membranes are impervious even for neutrinos. I do believe that the Universe's background radiation is a reflection of this condition of recycled containment? Do I believe it is possible to expand without containment? No. I believe growth to be cellular process even for Universe. Does Universe growth require division? Multi-Universe theorist may believe so! lol#2 yesIn that case let’s ask a question:3) Do you think that there is some distance beyond which there is no energy left at all in the wave front, i.e., where the energy is diminished to zero, meaning that the wave energy is not conserved?
Light travels at the speed of light in a vacuum, or if it is contained via black hole gravity or via human experimentation then it's speed is altered. An altered velocity indicates light's life cycle duration is like anything else in nature. Some light photons may last to 10 to the 18th power but some may not last half that time. Our estimate of the age of the Universe is 14 billions years, that is minute in comparison to 10 to the 18th power. Photons do and can decay into lighter particles. #1 yesLight is observable as a reflection to a barrier if there is nothing to reflect it, it's presence is obscure. Do i believe that a wave front loses its integrity via a lack of mass? lol.My previous example to you however in regards to light elongation was for a gamma ray which is more of a highly concentrated beam of light. Being such, it's origin is not spherical but Birkeland current like. Gamma rays in this notable form, originate from the center of galaxies, is their observable, visible mass finite? Yes, they appears to be. Does this preclude that their energy dissipates without their mass husk? No, but their mass husk are traveling at approx. the speed of light. We do know that neutrino proceed gamma ray burst. What relation is there between lighter particles neutrinos acceleration and photons traveling at the speed of light? Decaying photons! lol. Decaying photons releasing into neutrinos lift the speed of light limits for neutrinos! lol. So, photonic mass is containable by gravity, neutrinos are not. I do believe that dark matter membranes are impervious even for neutrinos. I do believe that the Universe's background radiation is a reflection of this condition of recycled containment? Do I believe it is possible to expand without containment? No. I believe growth to be cellular process even for Universe. Does Universe growth require division? Multi-Universe theorist may believe so! lol#2 yesTo have a light wave traveling at the speed of light you need photonic energy. Neutrinos do meet this criteria. Light decays into lighter particles, neutrinos. Wave energy as I believe you are defining it, is not conserved. Containment in the form background radiation is. lol Does energy exist without a structure to produce it? No. So, sub-elementary that have no structure are incapable of producing or sustaining energy production. An analogy would be amino acids, they are the building blocks of life but without DNA structure they are just amino acids. lol#3 yes, decayed photons, neutrinos, do not possess the structure necessary to produce energy, so the potential without structure is 0. lol