The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9   Go Down

What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?

  • 172 Replies
  • 14305 Views
  • 5 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21421
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 487 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #20 on: 20/10/2018 20:12:00 »
I haven't seen a reply to this yet.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/10/2018 12:27:16
If the front and back of the ship are not accelerating at (at least very nearly) the same rate, you are tearing your ship apart.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Janus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 756
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 180 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #21 on: 20/10/2018 20:23:03 »
http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Rindler/RindlerHorizon.html
Logged
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #22 on: 20/10/2018 20:43:34 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/10/2018 20:12:00
I haven't seen a reply to this yet.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/10/2018 12:27:16
If the front and back of the ship are not accelerating at (at least very nearly) the same rate, you are tearing your ship apart.
I had replied (with a reference) in post 13.
Essentially, if the two ends accelerate at the same rate (same g force applied for the same duration as measured by a local clock), then they'll stay the same distance apart (in the original frame) but the ship breaks up due to length contraction in that original frame.

The same thing can be expressed using accelerating frames, but that's the simplest explanation.
Logged
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #23 on: 20/10/2018 20:48:47 »
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 14:43:32
I have a ship that is a light year long.  In frame P (parked) it extends from 0 (tail) to 366 (nose) light days.
Now I accelerate it (or at least the tail) to .866c (dilation 50%) in one month as measured by a P clock.
...
You can accelerate as hard as you like.  There seems to be no limit.
I thought about this some more and found it unrealistic to accelerate the tail.  The pilot is going to want to sit right in the middle where his commands can be carried out in minimal time.  So how fast can the middle be accelerated?  If the front accelerates less, the rear must accelerate harder.  So is there a limit to that?
I think not again, but it gets funny.  My ship is two light years long (1 each way from our observer midpoint).  I accelerate the pilot to .866c in a month, meaning the tail has to move .54 light years in a month, sort of.  The sort of saves us, but since the clock at the tail moves backwards, does it need to reach into a time when the ship was stationary?
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21421
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 487 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #24 on: 20/10/2018 20:57:54 »
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 20:43:34
I had replied (with a reference) in post 13.
oops.
Sorry, I missed that.
But the problem is that, as I sit on the ship, there's nothing causing it to break. Any hypothetical breakage is at odds with causality.
So I know that the acceleration of the two ends are the same (and the clocks , which are stationary from my PoV, run at the same rate).
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #25 on: 20/10/2018 20:59:53 »
Quote from: Janus on 20/10/2018 20:23:03
http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Rindler/RindlerHorizon.html
Good reading, yes.  Haven't even got into it yet, but it opens with a discussion of fishing from a black hole, and equating that to an accelerating observer trailing something behind, exactly what I brought up in my prior post.

Without reading the article beyond that, I see a problem:  This is equivalent to a uniform gravitational field of the same force as my acceleration at the ships midpoint.  As I go further back, I'm getting deeper in the gravity well, until the escape velocity back there is light speed, and my ship cannot accelerate without breaking.

That means that a sufficiently long ship cannot accelerate at all.  The tail can accelerate, but any arbitrary point above that has a limit, which is near zero for most of the ship.
Logged
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #26 on: 20/10/2018 21:06:00 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/10/2018 20:57:54
But the problem is that, as I sit on the ship, there's nothing causing it to break. Any hypothetical breakage is at odds with causality.
Sure there is.  Picture it as a series of ships, all accelerating identically and independently.  As length contracts in the original frame, the separation between ships does not. So it breaks because gaps form.  The ship becomes stretched, and it cannot take that.
That's what the other thread was about, but it is framed as sort of a push for evidence of aether, which it isn't.

Quote
So I know that the acceleration of the two ends are the same (and the clocks , which are stationary from my PoV, run at the same rate).
Yes, so the separation between the two clocks is always the same, but the ship length is not, so it breaks.
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21421
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 487 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #27 on: 20/10/2018 21:49:37 »
OK, Let's imagine there are a string of ships- each a foot apart, and each pilot carefully keeps a foot long ruler between his ship and the next.
As the string all speed up all the rulers shorten. All the ships shorten and all the gaps between the ships shorten And they all shrink to exactly the same extent.
So the rulers all still fit exactly into the gaps.

Just saying "
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 21:06:00
The ship becomes stretched
does not work.
There needs to be something that I, on my ship, can see causing the break, or it won't happen.

From my PoV, the ship stays the same length.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #28 on: 20/10/2018 22:26:49 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/10/2018 21:49:37
OK, Let's imagine there are a string of ships- each a foot apart, and each pilot carefully keeps a foot long ruler between his ship and the next.
As the string all speed up all the rulers shorten. All the ships shorten and all the gaps between the ships shorten And they all shrink to exactly the same extent.
So the rulers all still fit exactly into the gaps.
No, the gaps do not shorten, else the ship 20 light years ahead would be closer to the rear (in the frame where everyone was stopped) than before he started accelerating.
Really, read the other thread.  It totally discusses exactly that issue.
Quote
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 21:06:00
The ship becomes stretched
does not work.
There needs to be something that I, on my ship, can see causing the break, or it won't happen.
Well, if they're a stack of independent ships, you see the gap widen.  If it is one brittle object, you see it break due to being stretched.  The forces of contraction don't bring the two pieces together like they would do on a real ship of reasonable length because there is an equal force the other way of the next ship pulling the opposite direction.  The tension forces might alter the front and back a bit beyond what the engines are doing, but the middle has no choice but to break up.

Quote
From my PoV, the ship stays the same length.
If the line of independent ships all behave the same, then from your POV (not on any of them), the line stays the same length, yes.  But it is one object, and object contract with the speed it has from your POV, so it cannot stay the same length like the line of independent ships is trying to do.
« Last Edit: 21/10/2018 05:09:27 by Halc »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11034
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 635 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #29 on: 21/10/2018 09:23:08 »
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 14:27:54
Clocks forward of a given observer will appear to run faster, and clock behind a given observer will appear to run slower.
No, because you have stipulated that they are all accelerating at the same rate. You can't have your cake and eat it!

The key word here is "relativity". Every observation is made relative to what?
« Last Edit: 21/10/2018 09:26:20 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21421
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 487 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #30 on: 21/10/2018 09:50:03 »
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 22:26:49
No, the gaps do not shorten, else the ship 20 light years ahead would be closer to the rear (in the frame where everyone was stopped) than before he started accelerating.
Well, yes, and no.
They don't shorten from my PoV- and that's exactly why my  ship doesn't fall apart. If I use my (accelerating) ruler to measure the (equally accelerating) gap, I get the same measurement. From my PoV nothing is shrinking on my ship. The people I left behind at the launch pad are shrinking.

The gaps do shorten from someone else's perspective. But those people don't see anything fall apart, they just see the ship shrink slightly along its length.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #31 on: 21/10/2018 13:34:26 »
Ok so you have a ship 1 light-year long moving with inertial motion. As the front passes you the rear sends a light signal towards you. If it takes less than 1 year to reach you then you can say that length contraction is physical. If it takes 1 year then length contraction is only a function of time dilation. An interesting proposition.

EDIT Of course then you have the issue of determining time dilation. Who do you consider to be moving and who is stationary?
« Last Edit: 21/10/2018 13:45:12 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #32 on: 21/10/2018 14:32:25 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 21/10/2018 09:23:08
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 14:27:54
Clocks forward of a given observer will appear to run faster, and clock behind a given observer will appear to run slower.
No, because you have stipulated that they are all accelerating at the same rate. You can't have your cake and eat it!

The key word here is "relativity". Every observation is made relative to what?
For one, the different parts of the ship are not accelerating at the same rate, else the ship would break apart.  I stipulated that the ship was always stationary in the frame of any point in the ship at any time. There is a term for it that I learned from Janus's link: The ship is 'Born rigid'. Those frames are all different depending on the point in the ship.  Anyway, this is needed for the ship to not break apart.

Secondly, perhaps I was not clear.  My observer above is on the ship, not in any inertial frame.  For such an observer, clocks (accelerating with the observer or not) ahead of the observer in the accelerating reference frame will advance at a pace greater than the observers clock, and clocks behind will lose time, even to the point of running backwards.

This is apparent in the Andromeda paradox where a calendar there might be October in my frame when the Earth spins me towards some planet in Andromeda, but is July there 10 hours later after I've accelerated away from it.  Their clock has run backwards from my POV.
That can't happen on my ship.  If it did, the ship would break up.
Logged
 



Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #33 on: 21/10/2018 14:59:23 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/10/2018 09:50:03
Quote from: Halc on 20/10/2018 22:26:49
No, the gaps do not shorten, else the ship 20 light years ahead would be closer to the rear (in the frame where everyone was stopped) than before he started accelerating.
Well, yes, and no.
They don't shorten from my PoV- and that's exactly why my  ship doesn't fall apart.
You ship is no different from a building sitting on a planet with a gravitational field identical to the acceleration of the ship.  The upper floors accelerate less (you can tell because you weigh less up there), and they take longer to do the same acceleration (the clocks run faster up there if you compare them to the lower floors).  So that's why the ship holds together.  The different parts are accelerating at different rates, just like the building.

Quote
The gaps do shorten from someone else's perspective. But those people don't see anything fall apart, they just see the ship shrink slightly along its length.
This leads to a direct contradiction.  From the perspective (in the frame F) of a stationary observer as the ships depart, ship X and Y both accelerate independently and identically.  They are 10 light years apart, at location 0 (X) and 10 (Y), accelerating in the positive direction.  They take 1 year to get to .866c relative to F so the ships are both now half their original length.  Ship X has moved from 0 to about 0.45, and you say the gap of 10 light years has shortened to 5 light years, so Y is now at location 5.45, a location it could not reach from location 10 in just 1 year.  It seems to have moved backwards at 4.5c despite accelerating forwards just like X did.
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21421
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 487 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #34 on: 21/10/2018 15:19:52 »
Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 14:59:23
You ship is no different from a building sitting on a planet with a gravitational field identical to the acceleration of the ship.  The upper floors accelerate less (you can tell because you weigh less up there),
It is very plainly different.


I can measure the gravitational field as I go up + down  building, and I can work out from those reading how big the planet is.
That measurement- the radius of the planet- gives me a "scale" for the rate of change of acceleration with distance.

But on a ship, in space there's no planet nearby.
So there's nothing to calculate the change of acceleration with distance.

So there is no such change.

Fundamentally, you are saying that my ship falls apart as I watch , but no matter how hard I look on my ship, I can find no source of the force that causes it to break up.
That's a breach of causation.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #35 on: 21/10/2018 15:27:14 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 21/10/2018 13:34:26
Ok so you have a ship 1 light-year long moving with inertial motion.
OK, so we're considering a different frame F than the ship's frame S.  Is the ship a light year of proper length (in S), or 1 light year long in the F? Given context of the question, you apparently assume a one light year proper length, and it is contracted in F.  Just making sure.  Our observer is O who is stationary in F.
Quote
As the front passes you the rear sends a light signal towards you.
This is vague since no frame is specified. Let's call the event of the front passing the observer E1.
I have one signal sent from the rear at an event E2 simultaneous with the E1 in frame F.  Another signal is sent at event E3 which is simultaneous with E1 in frame S.
Quote
If it takes less than 1 year to reach you then you can say that length contraction is physical. If it takes 1 year then length contraction is only a function of time dilation. An interesting proposition.
O will measure less than a year between E1 and getting the signal from E2 or E3, but the E2 signal gets to him first.

Quote
EDIT Of course then you have the issue of determining time dilation. Who do you consider to be moving and who is stationary?
The answers above do not depend on this at all.
« Last Edit: 21/10/2018 15:29:59 by Halc »
Logged
 

Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #36 on: 21/10/2018 15:37:19 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/10/2018 15:19:52
Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 14:59:23
You ship is no different from a building sitting on a planet with a gravitational field identical to the acceleration of the ship.  The upper floors accelerate less (you can tell because you weigh less up there),
It is very plainly different.
Einstein says they're identical, except that the building would need to be in a uniform gravitational field, and Earth's field is uniform only over limited heights.  The exact analogy would be a building in a perfect uniform field.


Quote
I can measure the gravitational field as I go up + down  building, and I can work out from those reading how big the planet is.
No you cannot.  You need more information than that to measure radius.  There are 4 planets with gravity pretty much the same as Earth, so the guy measuring his weight change would not know the very different radius of the different planets.  Saturn is actually the closest gravity to Earth.

Quote
But on a ship, in space there's no planet nearby.
So there's nothing to calculate the change of acceleration with distance.
You can walk up and down the ship with a scale, just like you did with the building.

Quote
Fundamentally, you are saying that my ship falls apart as I watch , but no matter how hard I look on my ship, I can find no source of the force that causes it to break up.
The force is the front of the ship pulling too hard, trying to get further ahead of the rear.

Please comment on the contradiction I pointed out in my prior reply to you.
« Last Edit: 21/10/2018 17:54:49 by Halc »
Logged
 



Offline Halc (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2163
  • Activity:
    28%
  • Thanked: 164 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #37 on: 21/10/2018 21:00:58 »
OK, so we have an acceleration limit on our long object.
So let's give an example, and see if we can generalize afterwards.

I have a ship that cannot take stress as I've described.  It is 100 light years in length, stopped in Frame F.  I want to move it forward by one light hour (about 1.08 billion km) in frame F.  How quickly (as measured in F) can I do that?  Obviously a tiny object can do it in about an hour at maximum speed.

We can't go at maximum speed.  If the tail T accelerates to c in an instant, the nose N requires 100 years to get up to that speed and by that time it has moved far further than a lousy light hour.  So it seems we want to instantly accelerate T just enough to get the nose of the ship to our destination (100 LY + 1 light hour) in the frame of T, and then instantly accelerate N by the opposite amount to drag the tail up the same distance.  Boom.  We've moved the desired distance.

So let's see, there are 876000 hours in a century, so we want to dilate the distance between the target of N and the current position of T by that factor (876000/875999) which happens at about 452 km/sec.  So I instantly accelerate T to 452 km/sec, and then slow down at a steady pace until I stop.  That's an average of 226 km/sec, so it takes over 55.3 days to move my ship that far.  It cannot be done faster.  Passengers near either end will die of the G forces if the engines don't accelerate them with the rest of the fragile ship, but the ones in the middle will experience a snail-like acceleration of about 0.68 m/sec every hour.
I will get disagreements of course, but I'm going to defend that answer.
« Last Edit: 21/10/2018 21:09:45 by Halc »
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21421
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 487 times
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #38 on: 21/10/2018 21:27:23 »
Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 15:37:19
The force is the front of the ship pulling too hard, trying to get further ahead of the rear.
No.
I carefully set the engines to produce the same acceleration.
Each section of the ship has the same mass.
So, they all are subject to the same forces.
All that force (for each section) goes into moving that bit of the ship
So there's none left over to pull my ship apart.

Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 15:37:19
Please comment on the contradiction I pointed out in my prior reply to you.
OK.
Your contradiction is based on claims that you can not justify.

Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 15:37:19
No you cannot.
Yes I can- because the change in apparent mass is not linear.
Essentially, if the change with height is slow then the radius is big.

Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 15:37:19
Einstein says they're identical, except that the building would need to be in a uniform gravitational field
So, it's only identical if you have an infinitely large planet.
Since infinite planets don't exist there is a difference.
Thanks for confirming that I'm right.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11034
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 635 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What limits does relativity put on acceleration of long objects?
« Reply #39 on: 21/10/2018 22:59:48 »
Quote from: Halc on 21/10/2018 14:32:25
For one, the different parts of the ship are not accelerating at the same rate, else the ship would break apart.
That is obviously incorrect.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: relativity  / rindler horizon  / accelerated reference frame  / arf  / born rigid 
 

Similar topics (5)

Hair we go..how long does hair last ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 2
Views: 15542
Last post 14/09/2006 20:56:38
by daveshorts
How long do I have to work out for to work off a Mars bar?

Started by thedocBoard General Science

Replies: 11
Views: 11883
Last post 13/01/2018 17:42:38
by Bored chemist
How long are dog years compared to human years?

Started by paul.frBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 8
Views: 9311
Last post 13/05/2008 07:47:55
by TheHerbaholic
Why Are Some People Short-sighted and others Long Sighted ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 7
Views: 8393
Last post 21/10/2018 15:56:56
by Catastrophe
Do you prefer the long version or shortened version of your name?

Started by CliffordKBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 6
Views: 5096
Last post 30/10/2018 03:34:11
by Monox D. I-Fly
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.182 seconds with 79 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.