0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 17/12/2021 12:19:11Which concept?Why so?The concept of "a" people, for the reason stated.
Which concept?Why so?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 17/12/2021 12:26:00It depends on what's the difference that they have. I specifically referred to what they are, not what they do. Civilised laws criminalise actions, superstitions criminalise appearance, parentage, etc.
It depends on what's the difference that they have.
The justice secretary Dominic Raab has been ruthlessly mocked online after his bizarre claim that the police ‘don’t normally look back and investigate things that have taken place a year ago’.......................Jess Phillips, the shadow minister for domestic violence, added: “Dominic Raab seemingly thinks he’s the justice secretary in Minority Report where only future crimes are of interest.”
Weren't you the one who stated that the earth would be better off without people?
Crime prevention (locks and fences) is normally passive and designed so as not to inconvenience legitimate activity. Dogs and laser-triggered guns are effective but find it difficult to distinguish criminal intent from faulty navigation. We really don't have much in between.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 19/12/2021 07:45:59Weren't you the one who stated that the earth would be better off without people?Absolutely so, but in the meantime people would be better off without using the term "a people". We should act as one collaborative tribe, not several snatch squads ruled by parasites.
Should we collaborate to organize mass suicide to give the best thing to earth?Why, or why not?
Massive public camera system with AI to correctly interpret the data will be an option to keep or restore order.
We should act as one collaborative tribe, not several snatch squads ruled by parasites.
Because what is best for the rest of the planet is not best for us. That is the whole point of this discussion: species are competitive for resources, and pollute their environment with their waste products.
"Order" is always defined by the "haves", whether they are corrupt Tories, corrupt Communists, or individual criminals like Trump and Saddam Hussein.
Why limit the group to species? Why not bigger or smaller group?
media, which are the minds of conscious entities
Because that is the largest known group that might not be internally competitive. Observation shows that species either compete with other species, predate on one another, or avoid contact altogether and occupy different ecological niches.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 20/12/2021 09:45:17 media, which are the minds of conscious entitiesMy grandmother used to cover the kitchen floor with newspaper in case the dog peed when she was out. One day I found her turning the pages over, because "he can't read but he likes to look at the pictures". I don't know of any other species that uses written or broadcast communication.
Quote from: alancalverd on 19/12/2021 14:43:26"Order" is always defined by the "haves", whether they are corrupt Tories, corrupt Communists, or individual criminals like Trump and Saddam Hussein. Is there a better alternative?What good comes out of chaos?
Why not choose smaller group?
Pets have their own kind of memes.
ISIS is an example of an entity came out of chaos in the region.
If you are looking for a universal, you won't find it proven in a sample!
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 21/12/2021 09:40:41ISIS is an example of an entity came out of chaos in the region.ISIS, the Nazi party, and just about every other disgusting regime you can think of, including Pol Pot and Donald Trump, promised "order from chaos" and only benefitted those at the top of the pile.