The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Has there always been a constant number of photons?

  • 31 Replies
  • 1712 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6671
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« on: 26/12/2018 19:11:24 »
Since the big bang has the number of photons remained constant? If not then what kind of interactions changes this number?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline Janus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 628
  • Activity:
    6%
  • Thanked: 159 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #1 on: 26/12/2018 19:50:18 »
The number of photons in the universe is constantly changing.  Stars produce them through fusion. radioactive isotopes emit them as gamma rays.  Materials can absorb them and then re-emit the energy as a larger number of lower energy photons...
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6671
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #2 on: 26/12/2018 20:05:23 »
Related to the above answer is the following page from CERN.
http://meroli.web.cern.ch/Lecture_photon_interaction.html
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 4077
  • Activity:
    57.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #3 on: 26/12/2018 22:42:20 »
Magnetic photon splitting is another mechanism that can change the number of photons in a system: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/304152/fulltext/35776.text.html
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8016
  • Activity:
    43%
  • Thanked: 484 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #4 on: 26/12/2018 23:24:22 »
I just switched on a light, thus destroying the balance of the universe.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6671
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #5 on: 27/12/2018 13:44:13 »
As soon as I read that I switched off a light. Ha ha!
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3421
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #6 on: 27/12/2018 14:50:30 »
http://meroli.web.cern.ch/Lecture_photon_interaction.html

Quote
As consequence of such kind of interactions a photon that interacts with the target is completely removed from the incident beam, in other words a beam of photons that cross a medium is not degraded in energy but only attenuated in intensity.

Have I interpreted this correctly?

A beam of photons is travelling through (e.g.) a vacuum.  It hits a transparent/translucent target.  Any photon that interacts with the target is removed from the beam, so the continuing beam is not influenced by any energy exchange involving the removed photon.  Therefore, the photons in the continuing beam retain their original energy, but there are less of them.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3147
  • Activity:
    23.5%
  • Thanked: 392 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #7 on: 27/12/2018 17:37:18 »
Just to muddy the waters a bit... if there are an infinite number of photons in the universe, then this would have to be unchanged by such limited transactions as absorption and emission. ???
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8016
  • Activity:
    43%
  • Thanked: 484 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #8 on: 27/12/2018 18:00:25 »
Quote from: Bill S on 27/12/2018 14:50:30
Any photon that interacts with the target is removed from the beam, so the continuing beam is not influenced by any energy exchange involving the removed photon.
Yes and no. Depends on the nature of the interaction. At low photon energies the photon generally disappears into heat, a chemical change, or the movement of charge in an electrical circuit, but at energies above the visible spectrum you can get all sorts of secondary emission including photonuclear reactions.

We use all kinds of filters to remove photons of specific energies from a beam to produce a more monoenergetic  (monochromatic) beam of lower intensity.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7654
  • Activity:
    25.5%
  • Thanked: 751 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #9 on: 27/12/2018 20:38:00 »
Quote
Therefore, the photons in the continuing beam retain their original energy, but there are less of them.
If the beam strikes an object that is above the black body temperature, the object will heat up, and will radiate the increased temperature as low-energy photons.

Anything in deep space that is hotter than the CMBR (2.7K) will, overall, radiate many low energy photons.
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 18341
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #10 on: 28/12/2018 09:47:01 »
You're thinking of the idea in where there only are transformations, but no 'loss' in a universe Jeffrey? If they are 'excitations in a field' then the number should vary with what interactions presents itself under a arrow of time I think.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6671
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #11 on: 28/12/2018 11:33:16 »
Quote from: yor_on on 28/12/2018 09:47:01
You're thinking of the idea in where there only are transformations, but no 'loss' in a universe Jeffrey? If they are 'excitations in a field' then the number should vary with what interactions presents itself under a arrow of time I think.

The question was intended to provoke answers of interest to readers. However, you are correct in interpreting my line of reasoning. It all stems from symmetry and conservation .
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 18341
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #12 on: 28/12/2018 12:06:58 »
Yes, those concepts are in some ways exceptionally mindnumbing. Symmetries and conservation laws. Remember when JP first explained to me how he looked at a 'photon recoil' as a 'demand' from conservation laws. It's not that far from being in a cave.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3421
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #13 on: 28/12/2018 16:41:51 »
Quote from: Chiral
Just to muddy the waters a bit... if there are an infinite number of photons in the universe, then this would have to be unchanged by such limited transactions as absorption and emission.

Large quantity of mud!   If infinity is not a number, how can there be an infinite number of anything? 

Possibly you added the smiley because you guessed I couldn’t resist the bait.  :)
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6671
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 173 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #14 on: 28/12/2018 16:50:53 »
Does the circumference of a circle with infinite radius equal a straight line? If so no part of the circumference would tell you that it forms a circle. Similarly no one photon would tell you it is part of an infinite set.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3421
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #15 on: 28/12/2018 17:08:08 »
Quote
Does the circumference of a circle with infinite radius equal a straight line? If so no part of the circumference would tell you that it forms a circle. Similarly no one photon would tell you it is part of an infinite set.

You should have been a politician :)  This doesn't answer the question.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3421
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #16 on: 28/12/2018 17:10:01 »
Quote from: Alan
Depends on the nature of the interaction. At low photon energies the photon generally disappears into heat, a chemical change, or the movement of charge in an electrical circuit, but at energies above the visible spectrum you can get all sorts of secondary emission including photonuclear reactions.

What is the likelihood that emissions arising from these interactions would influence the original beam?
Would there be any effect other than "attenuated intensity"?

Quote
We use all kinds of filters to remove photons of specific energies from a beam to produce a more monoenergetic  (monochromatic) beam of lower intensity.

In these cases; would a filter equate to a “target”, in the original quote?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3421
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #17 on: 28/12/2018 17:14:07 »
Quote from: Yor_on
Yes, those concepts are in some ways exceptionally mindnumbing. Symmetries and conservation laws. Remember when JP first explained to me how he looked at a 'photon recoil' as a 'demand' from conservation laws. 

Do you have a link to that explanation?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 18341
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 55 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #18 on: 28/12/2018 17:58:14 »
Hmm maybe? It's here on TNS, and I miss that guy.
=

Can't find it Bill, but as far I remember it was 'turning my head'

Reality isn't what I expected then.
« Last Edit: 28/12/2018 18:06:15 by yor_on »
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3421
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has there always been a constant number of photons?
« Reply #19 on: 28/12/2018 19:08:53 »
Quote
Hmm maybe? It's here on TNS, and I miss that guy.

Don't we all?

Is this the thread it came from?  I’ve not had time to look through it yet, but could be, perhaps.

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=33720.msg326035#msg326035
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Are Photons "pushed" or "pulled ?

Started by RE.CraigBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 19
Views: 6092
Last post 27/02/2013 10:29:27
by yor_on
Two low energy photons for one high energy photon in fluorescence possible?

Started by McKayBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 2535
Last post 19/05/2019 13:05:28
by alancalverd
Could the missing 6 dimensions be atoms, protons, neutrons, neutrinos, photons and consciousness?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 2092
Last post 06/08/2016 23:36:07
by evan_au
Do photons absorb energy when entering strong gravitational field differentials

Started by jerrygg38Board General Science

Replies: 3
Views: 2400
Last post 10/09/2016 14:11:02
by jerrygg38
If mass increases as you approach the speed of light, why are photons massless?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 19
Views: 3592
Last post 08/04/2018 15:15:48
by guest45734
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.266 seconds with 83 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.