0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have presented, cannot be ignored, evidences after evidences why there is no black hole which no light can escape, thus, is invisible.
Trying to tackle the intriguing issue whether black hole is real because IT is ACTUAL is one of the biggest challenge in modern astronomy.. Surely EHT, NASA, as well as other respected astronomical societies have read in passing the brief posting (re-Inviting comments from NASA, EHT that Black hole is just a super- giant boiling object in space…) which Naked Science, kindly, posted in Google. I have presented, cannot be ignored, evidences after evidences why there is no black hole which no light can escape, thus, is invisible. Hope you will re-post that article forum to Google. (Again regards and thank you for being concerned when undersigned was sick. But now, he is recovering, hope so) Jsaldea12 feb. 17, 2019
Can you repute the proofs/ evidences I presented? It is just that it is hard to accept the truth. there is no black hole. jsaldea12 Feb. 17, 2019
...which Naked Science, kindly, posted in Google.
Can you repute the proofs/ evidences I presented?
Why do you say that the detected speed of gravitational waves and light waves, both with electro-magnetic property,
on ejected super heated jets of super-galaxies are the same, and if both are detected , how do LIGO re- assure that both have same speed of light.
Final query: why do you say that the same speed of gravitational waves and light waves affirm black hole. LIGO never said that ..
It was respected Forum King Kriptid who said:
Nevertheless both have inherent positive and negative property, the same inherent positive and negative property of spacetime.
Astronomical telescopes from two separate places, 2,000 miles away, provide the data, feed it to laser interferometers underground tunnels
arms,some 2,000 miles long, completely emptied of air, thus vacuumed
The point is all the way after astronomical telescope pick up the collision of galaxiy
Because light waves and gravitational waves are the function, the making of waves on the fabric of spacetime
But why does the super-jets, super-heated,jettisoned from super-galaxy become the signature of black hole.
But the SAME giant object, not a supposed black hole, can eject same jets!!
By the way, I knew respected Dr. Kip Thorne, unfortunately, he never responded, just received.
Why do you say that the collision of two black hole is proof of existence of black hole?
It is pretty obvious from your posts that you are not any kind of scientist. Your grammar and spelling is also appalling.
Let us stick to issue: Why do you say that the collision of two black hole is proof of existence of black hole? jsaldea12 Fedb. 20, 2019
The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of 1.0 × 10−21. It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. Over 0.2 s, the signal increases in frequency and amplitude in about 8 cycles from 35 to 150 Hz, where the amplitude reaches a maximum. The most plausible explanation for this evolution is the inspiral of two orbiting masses, m1 and m2, due to gravitational-wave emission.The basic features of GW150914 point to it being produced by the coalescence of two black holes—i.e., their orbital inspiral and merger, and subsequent final black hole ringdown.Estimating f and f_ from the data in Fig. 1, we obtain a chirp mass of M ≃ 30M⊙, implying that the total mass M ¼ m1 þ m2 is ≳70M⊙ in the detector frame. This bounds the sum of the Schwarzschild radii of the binary components to 2GM=c2 ≳ 210 km. To reach an orbital frequency of 75 Hz (half the gravitational-wave frequency) the objects must have been very close and very compact; equal Newtonian point masses orbiting at this frequency would be only ≃350 km apart. A pair of neutron stars, while compact, would not have the required mass, while a black hole neutron star binary with the deduced chirp mass would have a very large total mass, and would thus merge at much lower frequency. This leaves black holes as the only known objects compact enough to reach an orbital frequency of 75 Hz without contact. Furthermore, the decay of the waveform after it peaks is consistent with the damped oscillations of a black hole relaxing to a final stationary Kerr configuration.The LIGO detectors have observed gravitational waves from the merger of two stellar-mass black holes. The detected waveform matches the predictions of general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. These observations demonstrate the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems. This is the first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.
If we can decipher it, the ripples' symphony will contain a wealth of information:The symphony will contain a signature that says, "I come from a pair of black holes that are spiraling together and coalescing." This will be the kind of absolutely unequivocal black-hole signature that astronomers thus far have searched for in vain using light and X-rays (Chapter 8 ) and radio waves (Chapter 9). Because the light, X-rays and radio waves are produced far outside a hole's horizon, and because they are emitted by a type of material (hot, high-speed electrons) that is completely different from that of which the hole is made (pure spacetime curvature), and because they can be strongly distorted by propagating through intervening matter, they can bring us but little information about the hole, and no definitive signature. The ripples of curvature (gravitational waves), by contrast, are produced very near the coalescing holes' horizons, they are made of the same material (a warpage of the fabric of spacetime) as the holes, they are not distorted at all by propagating through intervening matter- and, as a consequence, they can bring us detailed information about the holes and an unequivocal black-hole signature.
Respected EHT has not yet made an official statement whether that object at the core of Milky Way is truly invisible that light annot escape.
That the blown out fire-blast dust and gas, originating from the boiling core of Milky Way, extends far out from the limitng EH, proves it escapes with light.