[seeker3 (OP)]

Professor, I think I discovered a new force, how do you think? Thanks 
   Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:51 PM
To: simonjon@uchicago.edu

Similar to universal gravitation force between matters, there is an
universal repulsion force between line of sight electrons on the
surface of matters. Without gravitation, we cannot orbit the Sun.
Without repulsion, Sun light cannot reach us.

Because electrons are on the surface of all matters, and because line
of sight electrons are constantly repelling each other with Coulomb's
force F=Ke x ee/R^2, therefore between the surfaces of matter A and
matter B there exists an universal repulsion force F=Ke x aebe/R^2. In
the equation, a is the number of line of sight electrons on the
surface of mater A, b is the number of line of sight electrons on the
surface of matter B, R is the average distance.

This universal repulsion force is always existing at any distance,
therefore line of sight electrons are constantly connected by this
force at any distance,  therefore they can share their kinetic energy
instantaneously at any distance.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light energy in the
vacuum space between stars and planets. Light energy is instantly
shared between line of sight vibrating electrons on the surface of the
Sun and electrons on Earth outer atmosphere, then it becomes light
wave and traveling in the air at light speed C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light between
things you see and your eyes. Due to air in between, light speed is C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of EM wave between
antenna and receiver. Due to air in between, EM wave speed is C.

Due to the existence of universal repulsion force, all star lights
reach Earth outer atmosphere instantly, become light wave traveling in
the air at speed C.

Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us is mistaken. Time delay in space
communication is impossible.

If light speed in vacuum space is infinite, relativity,
electromagnetism and quantum physics will be all wrong.

Use MIT trillion frame per second camera to measure light speed inside
of a vacuum glass bottle, we can prove light speed in vacuum is
infinite.

Light only exists in air, water, medium/matter. There is no light in
vacuum space.

Energy instantly teleported from the Sun to Earth outer atmosphere.
Due to the existence of universal repulsion force between electrons on
the sun and our outer atmosphere.

Einstein and Newton thought light is something traveling through space
at light speed. It has both wave and particle properties.

They were both wrong.

[Kryptid]

Time delay in space
communication is impossible.

Yet we know for a fact that it happens. So that falsifies your assumptions.

[Bored chemist]

"I asked top 500 physics professors a question, no one answered, why?"
Because there was so much wrong that they didn't know where to start.

[seeker3 (OP)]

MIT professors know less than you?

[Bored chemist]

MIT professors know less than you?

No.
I also don't know where to start  explaining just how wrong you are.
I suggest you work your way through the physics courses here
https://www.khanacademy.org/

[Janus]

The reason you haven't gotten any answers is that physics professors have better things to do with their time than to answer you just to point out how wrong your idea is, especially when they know your reaction will be to not believe them.

They get these types of letters all the time, and like all unsolicited mail from people like you, it was trashed without even being opened.( Likely by a secretary with standing orders to do so.)

And considering that you are making claims that go against actual established fact verified by real life measurements, I don't blame them.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Is Coulomb's force a fact?

Is atoms are on the surface of all matters a fact?

Is universal repulsion force a fact according to Coulomb's law?

Was scientists been searching for levity in the past a fact?

Did I point it out, explained its mechanism and math support?

[Kryptid]

Just because you started off with a few basic science facts doesn't mean that your reasoning is sound. If your model predicts that light speed in space is infinite then your model has been falsified because this is demonstrably not true. Due to signal delays, we know for a fact that light does not travel at infinite speed through space.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Light speed in vacuum space has never been measured. The latest time scientists measure light speed in air was 1926.

I suggested them to use MIT tech to measure light speed in vacuum glass bottle, hope someone search for the truth.

MIT had a video show off their trillion frame camera filming laser pause passing through a water bottle, in very slow motion.

Use same technology they can easily measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle, I wrote to the tech team, they didn't reply. Don't understand why. 

[Kryptid]

Light speed in vacuum space has never been measured.

I already told you about time delays when communicating with spacecraft. Multiple times.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Suppose a professor has the access, measured and find light speed in vacuum is infinite, what is he going to do?

Who will believe him?

[Kryptid]

Suppose a professor has the access, measured and find light speed in vacuum is infinite, what is he going to do?

Who will believe him?

Anyone who can replicate the experiment would believe him. But we already know that it's not infinite. Again, spacecraft communication delays...

[Bored chemist]

Suppose a professor has the access, measured and find light speed in vacuum is infinite, what is he going to do?

Claim a nobel prize.

Who will believe him?

Anyone who can be bothered to replicate the experiment.

[Bored chemist]

MIT had a video show off their trillion frame camera filming laser pause passing through a water bottle, in very slow motion.

Just for the record, this wouldn't work for two reasons.
First, the light you see in the image is scattered light- that's why it's coming out of the side of the bottle.
With a vacuum there would be nothing to scatter the light so there would be nothing to see.

Secondly, they don't really have a trillion frame per second camera.

Imagine the bus goes past my house every morning at exactly 8 am
I take a picture one morning at 8:00.
The next day I take a picture at 08:00;01
Next day at 08:00:02
and so on.
If I run those pictures together it will look like I took one picture per second.

But I'm not really taking 1 frame per second, I'm taking one picture per day.

[seeker3 (OP)]

[Kryptid]

Yes, I've seen this before.

It doesn't do anything to address the fact that signal speeds through space are known to be limited.

[seeker3 (OP)]

No one has the high speed camera, that is the problem.

There is an easier way to win a Nobel Prize by proving light is not wave in vacuum space.

Do a laser light double slit experiment in vacuum, light will not act as wave, light will act as particle, only two bright lines behind of the slits will show on the screen.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Yes, I've seen this before.

It doesn't do anything to address the fact that signal speeds through space are known to be limited.

Yes. The bottle is water filled. If we use vacuum glass bottle, laser light will disappear in the bottle but appear on the other side instantly, only needs 1 frame to cover the event.

[Kryptid]

laser light will disappear in the bottle but appear on the other side instantly, only needs 1 frame to cover the event.

We know for a fact that it wouldn't. You keep ignoring the spacecraft time delays I've been talking about.

[seeker3 (OP)]

I wrote to MIT tech camera team, suggested them to use a 3 section glass tube, water, vacuum, water connect together, filming laser pause passing through the whole tube.