[seeker3 (OP)]

The first 1 to do a double slit experiment in vacuum, can prove there is no light wave in vacuum space, win a Nobel.

If you have the access, you should take this golden opportunity.

Put the slits and screen on the walls of a square glass container. Point a laser beam on the slits, video the light wave interference on the screen. Then vacuum the container, video the interference disappear and left two bright lines on the screen as if light act as particle. 

In fact, light is not wave nor particle, light is vibrating electrostatic force carry by vibrating electrons/atoms.

Many people can repeat it after you, but you will get credit. If you can, do a video to change the world!

[seeker3 (OP)]

Find out truth is a good reason.

For example, you say gravity speed is light speed. I say gravity is instantaneous. Who is correct?

All forces are coexist with matters, attracting or repelling all the times, therefore infinite speed. Simple FACT. 

If gravity is light speed, it will be delay all the time, no planets can have stable orbit. This is simple FACT.

If LIGO can detect gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago, why can't LIGO detect CME or earth quake?

Seems all agreed?

[Kryptid]

Seems all agreed?

Nope.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Seems all agreed?

Nope.

You say so but I feel your mind is agreed. Otherwise you will quote something to against me.

[Kryptid]

Otherwise you will quote something to against me.

You might want to learn how logic works, because that ain't it.

[seeker3 (OP)]

Otherwise you will quote something to against me.

You might want to learn how logic works, because that ain't it.

No where to quote something to against me?

[Kryptid]

No where to quote something to against me?

I don't need to. I've already proven you wrong in reply #7.

[seeker3 (OP)]

I wrong is OK, as long as my logic is correct.

Agree?

[seeker3 (OP)]

Image the vacuum double slit experiment in action, the wave pattern disappearing as the air pumping out, only two light lines left on the screen.

You just changed the history!

You own me a drink.

[seeker3 (OP)]

The first 1 to do a double slit experiment in vacuum, can prove there is no light wave in vacuum space, win a Nobel.

If you have the access, you should take this golden opportunity.

Put the slits and screen on the walls of a square glass container. Point a laser beam on the slits, video the light wave interference on the screen. Then vacuum the container, video the interference disappear and left two bright lines on the screen as if light act as particle. 

In fact, light is not wave nor particle, light is vibrating electrostatic force carry by vibrating electrons/atoms.

Many people can repeat it after you, but you will get credit. If you can, do a video to change the world!

Please make sure the slits and the screen are on the inside of the container walls. Nothing is between the slits and screen. No air, no glass, only empty space.

[Kryptid]

I wrong is OK, as long as my logic is correct.

But it isn't correct. Light travels through space at a limited speed.

[seeker3 (OP)]

I wrong is OK, as long as my logic is correct.

But it isn't correct. Light travels through space at a limited speed.

What is light?

Light is energy, energy must coexist with matter. There is no light in the space between hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth.

All scientists thought light is EM wave or photon particle or both traveling in space at light speed. They are all wrong. There is no wave, no photon, nothing traveling in space at light speed. Energy jumps from matter to matter instantly, becomes light wave traveling in medium at light speed. Light speed in vacuum space is infinite. Therefore, relativity, QM and electromagnetism are all wrong.

By using MIT 10 trillion frame per second high speed camera, scientists can measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle to prove light speed in vacuum is infinite. But they won't do it, because if the truth is out, they will be in big trouble.

Electromagnetic Radiation

Electrons are on the surface of all matters. Electrons are constantly vibrating due to the thermal energy atoms carried. The higher temperature the higher vibration frequency.

Vibrating electrons carry kinetic energy, that energy can transfer to distant electrons through the repulsion force between line of sight electrons, science call it electromagnetic radiation. In Fact, there is only electrostatic radiation, there is no electromagnetic radiation.

How to prove it?

Electrostatic force decays at 1/R^2, EM wave strength decays at 1/R^2, Magnetic force decays at 1/R^3.

[Kryptid]

All scientists thought light is EM wave or photon particle or both traveling in space at light speed. They are all wrong.

This is the statement that I proved wrong in reply #7. Maybe you should actually go back and read it.

[seeker3 (OP)]

All scientists thought light is EM wave or photon particle or both traveling in space at light speed. They are all wrong.

This is the statement that I proved wrong in reply #7. Maybe you should actually go back and read it.

Tell you truth my friend. Your comment is as thebox comment to me.

[Kryptid]

Tell you truth my friend. Your comment is as thebox comment to me.

I'm not sure what that is supposed to mean, but it's simply a fact of the matter that it takes time to send signals to spacecraft to tell them what to do and then wait for them to respond. That's not debatable. It is observably true. If you conclude anything else, then your conclusion is at odds with reality.

[seeker3 (OP)]

It is fact that LIGO said detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago.

It is fact that gravity is instantaneous otherwise no planets have stable orbit.

It is fact that force are coexisting with matters all the times, therefore must be instantaneous.

Which fact is true fact?

[Kryptid]

It is fact that LIGO said detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago.

It is fact that gravity is instantaneous otherwise no planets have stable orbit.

It is fact that force are coexisting with matters all the times, therefore must be instantaneous.

Which fact is true fact?

Red herring. Those are just distractions from the fact that you are burying your head in the sand instead of admitting that signal delay between spacecraft proves your idea wrong.

[seeker3 (OP)]

I suggested you to watch Apollo videos, check out those shadows right under the objects as if the Sun is over head.

NASA must land on the moon at morning time to avoid high heat, how come they took videos at room time?

Many many many shadows are right under objects, how can you explain away?

Watch the LM fabric analysis video, seek the truth for yourself, don't cheat to yourself.

[Kryptid]

I suggested you to watch Apollo videos, check out those shadows right under the objects as if the Sun is over head.

NASA must land on the moon at morning time to avoid high heat, how come they took videos at room time?

Many many many shadows are right under objects, how can you explain away?

Watch the LM fabric analysis video, seek the truth for yourself, don't cheat to yourself.

Still red herrings. Even if it was true that the Moon landings were faked, that still doesn't do anything to change the fact that it is takes time to send signals to spacecraft and then to wait for a response.

[seeker3 (OP)]