[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

Giving the idea that in my thread I was able to falsify a current physical fact with evidence and present a new view for gravity I might have become one of the greatest scientists of all time and I deserve Nobel prize.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76559.20

[Bored chemist]

I was able to falsify a current physical fact

That's definitely impossible.
So you are mistaken.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I finally have came up with a new valid theory after 4 years joining this forum I made a lot of non-sense but finally managed to present a useful theory I decided  to stop here and not work on new theories any more and wait for my credits.

[Bored chemist]

I decided  to stop here

Good.

[Bored chemist]

I think I could get my dog "recognised" on those sites.
And I don't have a dog.

[Bored chemist]

It is impossible to falsify a fact.
Facts are true by definition.

[Bored chemist]

I meant what is widely known today as gravity is available everywhere in space.

We know that.
And we have done since Newton pointed it out 300 years ago.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I meant what is widely known today as gravity is available everywhere in space.

And we have done since Newton pointed it out 300 years ago.

Newton didn't know about space-time curvature he knew about gravity mathematically.He didn't know about the speed of light nor relativity.

[Bored chemist]

He knew that gravity is present throughout space.
So, what you said

what is widely known today as gravity is available everywhere in space.

was known to Newton.
But I think we have answered your question
"Am I one of the greatest scientists?"
No

[Ophiolite]

I have yet to see any evidence that you are a scientist. Thus far, based on your posts, you don't even make the grade as a bad scientist. Perhaps you should start again at the beginning with some formal courses, Then, at the very least, you might be able to appreciate just what it takes to be a great scientist. I think it is worth a try.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I have yet to see any evidence that you are a scientist. Thus far, based on your posts, you don't even make the grade as a bad scientist. Perhaps you should start again at the beginning with some formal courses, Then, at the very least, you might be able to appreciate just what it takes to be a great scientist. I think it is worth a try.

I will give you an advice:

You need to take courses to understand my great discovery as these great physicisits understood it :


http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0013

https://www.reddit.com/r/HypotheticalPhysics/comments/b6gm0o/what_if_gravity_doesnt_exist_at_infinity/

I have a great respect to this forum and it's my favourite my quotes from other sites is just to show that there are some people here who are mistaken about my discovery.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

I think I could get my dog "recognised" on those sites.

You're not even a physicist. So either you nor your dog will be recognized there.

[Kryptid]

You need to take courses to understand my great discovery

Not really.

Basically, you are treating gravity like light being emitted from a light bulb. Since the speed of light is limited, the expanding sphere of light generated by the light bulb will have only traveled a finite distance since the light bulb is switched on. Anything outside that sphere won't see the light bulb. By analogy, an object with a gravitational field that travels outward at the speed of light should also have a limited sphere of influence if the object has existed for a limited amount of time. The last part there, "has existed for a limited amount of time" is one of the possible problems of this idea, since we don't know if the Big Bang was the beginning of time, just another bang in a series of infinite Big Bangs or whatever else.

Seems pretty straightforward to understand.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

since we don't know if the Big Bang was the beginning of time, just another bang in a series of infinite Big Bangs or whatever else.

You said we don't know.Let's not talk about things we don't know.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

Quotes from the above sites:
"However, in a very basic sense, gravity behaves as you describe, despite your dubious mathematical claims "
Swanson Phd in atomic physics.
Scienceforum

"Gravity (be it gravitons, or spacetime curvature, or something else) doesn't "try to reach" anything It just spreads out from the source at the speed of light"
Reddit

"Wow, that's very interesting. Thanks for sharing!"
Vixra

"Fascinating idea"
Reddit

[Kryptid]

You said we don't know.Let's not talk about things we don't know.

Given that your idea hinges on something we don't know (whether time had a beginning or not) that would also mean we can't know whether your idea is right or not.

"Wow, that's very interesting. Thanks for sharing!"
Vixra

I wouldn't consider praise from Vixra to be particularly good, given that they accept joke papers and complete nonsense.

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

Given that your idea hinges on something we don't know

Part of it is unknown an unimportant one.The bigning of space-time curvature, it doesn't matter when it began the important thing is what is gravity and not how it is developed into its existence.

"Wow, that's very interesting. Thanks for sharing!"
Vixra

I wouldn't consider praise from Vixra to be particularly good, given that they accept joke papers and complete nonsense.

Other serious posts didn't recieve praise.Anyway I presented three sites.

[Kryptid]

the important thing is what is gravity

So how does your proposal differ from what is already known about gravity?

[Yahya A.Sharif (OP)]

So how does your proposal differ from what is already known about gravity?

Thanks for your question.
There is not a difference between my view of gravity and the view presented by GR , what I did is to falsify a misconcption about gravity extension and present new information about the topic.Making me one of the greatest scientists and deserve Nobel prize.

[Kryptid]

what I did is to falsify a misconcption about gravity extension

What was it that you falsified?