The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. A forum test theory and poll .

Poll

What does this abstract portray ?

Theory
0 (0%)
Hypothesis
0 (0%)
Psuedo
1 (50%)
Reality science, should be disucssed in main sections
1 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Voting closed: 07/04/2019 15:47:00

« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

A forum test theory and poll .

  • 1 Replies
  • 2059 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
A forum test theory and poll .
« on: 31/03/2019 15:47:00 »
Abstract - The theory of everything reality is a scientific research and investigation of present scientific theory and the notions involved .  Firstly making analysis of the information in which is  proposed ostensible content .  Secondly , proposing corrections to the  ostensible content , before finally concluding a theory of everything reality which is accreditied to the scientists of our past , with only minor changes of present semantics and interpretation .
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
  • Best Answer
  • Re: A forum test theory and poll .
    « Reply #1 on: 31/03/2019 17:39:17 »
    If this is meant to be a stand-alone abstract with no relation to anything posted before, then I would have to say that there is not sufficient information presented to properly answer the poll.

    If, on the other hand, this abstract is meant to reference what you've already posted here (such as your "5d interwoven model and tensor force") then I would say that you should add "nonsense" as an option in the poll.
    Logged
     
    The following users thanked this post: Bored chemist



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags: trolling 
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.451 seconds with 33 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.