[guest39538]

I'm not saying anything on science anymore ,

You seldom did.

Probably lots of things

Name one.

Arcing space-time maybe, my absolute mirror maybe , lots of things , I've done enough drawings in the past .

Besides I have a new past time now, I am correcting the youtubers who troll the police with youtube videos , filming police stations and causing alarm and distress on the people who work as the police because of their job role .

I'm additionally developing a new economical system for the UK , politics .  I've started a scientific investigation of the dualism of politics and I have discovered a great solution for the benefits system .

So anyway , I'm busy , helping out my country .

[Bored chemist]

Arcing space-time maybe, my absolute mirror maybe , lots of things , I've done enough drawings in the past .

What evidence is there that these (or anything else) was plagiarised?

[guest39538]

Arcing space-time maybe, my absolute mirror maybe , lots of things , I've done enough drawings in the past .

What evidence is there that these (or anything else) was plagiarised?

Lack of interest …..

[Bored chemist]

Arcing space-time maybe, my absolute mirror maybe , lots of things , I've done enough drawings in the past .

What evidence is there that these (or anything else) was plagiarised?

Lack of interest …..

Or just the reality where nobody is trying to take your ideas- because they are worthless.

[The Spoon]

Arcing space-time maybe, my absolute mirror maybe , lots of things , I've done enough drawings in the past .

What evidence is there that these (or anything else) was plagiarised?

Lack of interest …..

So you don't understand the meaning of the word plagiarised either then? Another thing to add to a very long list.

[guest39538]

Arcing space-time maybe, my absolute mirror maybe , lots of things , I've done enough drawings in the past .

What evidence is there that these (or anything else) was plagiarised?

Lack of interest …..

Or just the reality where nobody is trying to take your ideas- because they are worthless.

They would tell you your ideas are worthless to take them , that's a typical response

[Bored chemist]

If someone is plagiarising your ideas then they must be using them somewhere.

Either tell us where that's happening or shut up.

[guest39538]

If someone is plagiarising your ideas then they must be using them somewhere.

Either tell us where that's happening or shut up.

Obviously they'd use the ideas in an underground way , not advertised . I don't believe a  single one of you who says my ideas are nonsense when they use physics .

[guest39538]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

[Bored chemist]

I don't believe a  single one of you who says my ideas are nonsense when they use physics .

Reality does not care what you believe.

You don't use physics anyway; you just think you do  because you don't understand why you are wrong..

Obviously they'd use the ideas in an underground way ,

So, you admit you have no evidence at all that they have been copied.
So why post that they have?

[evan_au]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

[guest39538]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

A chair does not oblate , if it did it would be because of the floor pushing back . 

[The Spoon]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

A chair does not oblate , if it did it would be because of the floor pushing back . 

Indeed it doesn't, because oblate is not a verb.

[guest39538]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

A chair does not oblate , if it did it would be because of the floor pushing back . 

Indeed it doesn't, because oblate is not a verb.

Oblate is a form   and I see no reason that something doesn't push back the earth .

[The Spoon]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

A chair does not oblate , if it did it would be because of the floor pushing back . 

Indeed it doesn't, because oblate is not a verb.

Oblate is a form   and I see no reason that something doesn't push back the earth .

Also, Kryptid was not stating that the chair forms an oblate shape as you well know, but you choose to wilfully misunderstand to hide your ignorance.

[guest39538]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

A chair does not oblate , if it did it would be because of the floor pushing back . 

Indeed it doesn't, because oblate is not a verb.

Oblate is a form   and I see no reason that something doesn't push back the earth .

Also, Kryptid was not stating that the chair forms an oblate shape as you well know, but you choose to wilfully misunderstand to hide your ignorance.

I understand centrifugal force , stop being obtuse and discuss some earthly physics if you want to talk. 

A large area  A= xy affects the aether , it can curve it etc .

[The Spoon]

The earths oblate shape suggests an aether that pushes back .

The Earth's oblate shape suggests centrifugal force.

Sit on an office chair, and spin around - bits of your body tend to fling outwards.
- Experimental demonstration, with your own senses

No hypothetical aether required...

A chair does not oblate , if it did it would be because of the floor pushing back . 

Indeed it doesn't, because oblate is not a verb.

Oblate is a form   and I see no reason that something doesn't push back the earth .

Also, Kryptid was not stating that the chair forms an oblate shape as you well know, but you choose to wilfully misunderstand to hide your ignorance.

I understand centrifugal force , stop being obtuse and discuss some earthly physics if you want to talk. 

A large area  A= xy affects the aether , it can curve it etc .

Stop posting nonsense.

[The Spoon]

This inane nonsense really should be in the 'that can't be true' section.

[guest39538]

Stop posting nonsense.

You quite clearly do not have the ability to think if you think I'm talking nonsense .  Try a picture ...consider buoyancy and area .


fa.jpg (9.25 kB . 463x277 - viewed 3591 times)

[The Spoon]

Stop posting nonsense.

You quite clearly do not have the ability to think if you think I'm talking nonsense .  Try a picture ...consider buoyancy and area .

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

F=A then? What does that even mean? What does it have to do with bouyancy? What does it have to do with your fanciful, obsolete idea about aether? How does it even relate to the earth forming an oblate shape? Stop ducking and diving and answer peoples questions instead of obfuscating with bloody nonsense,.