0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Do you want to be more clever than Einstein?This is possible.
Being cleverer than a corpse is not a big challenge.
If Einstein would be alive, he could understand his mistake and accept this explanation.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 21/07/2019 18:27:31If Einstein would be alive, he could understand his mistake and accept this explanation. What mistake? You haven't pointed out any mistakes that Einstein made. I have no doubt that he would have known about the things you mentioned in the OP. I can't figure out what it is that you are trying to argue.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 21/07/2019 18:27:31If Einstein would be alive, he could understand his mistake and accept this explanation.I suspect that, if he was still with us, he would be embarrassed for you.He would be aware that every single test of his ideas had shown that he was right.In some cases that means he's right to about a dozen significant figures.What evidence do you have that he is anything other than "correct as far as we can tell"/
However they can break prejudices and memorizations
We can find similar phemenon in nature: If we drop a pebble to calm surface of a lake; a ring wave will be became. The expanding speed of ring wave is a value according to the surface of the lake; is not a relative speed according to us/experimentalist.
We didn't ask for pictures.We asked for evidence.Do you have any evidence that indicates that GR is actually wrong?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 22/07/2019 16:07:00We didn't ask for pictures.We asked for evidence.Do you have any evidence that indicates that GR is actually wrong?https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332902408_An_Experiment_for_Lorentz_-Fitzgerald_Contraction
Quote from: xersanozgen on 22/07/2019 16:32:29Quote from: Bored chemist on 22/07/2019 16:07:00We didn't ask for pictures.We asked for evidence.Do you have any evidence that indicates that GR is actually wrong?https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332902408_An_Experiment_for_Lorentz_-Fitzgerald_ContractionWell, OK, thanks for providing that.It's evidence of a sort.
So, they did not see a contraction but the expected contraction is about 10,000 times smaller than they could expect to measure.
What I should have said is that, if the ether existed, the experiment would still be ten thousand times too insensitive to detect it.
So, it's a rubbish experiment.
Whereas the 'c' velocity of photon is universal speed of light according to space.
The source can go anywhere freely from this point after emitting.
do you have any meaningful evidence to show that GR is wrong?