The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?

  • 21 Replies
  • 6408 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« on: 22/07/2019 03:23:37 »
H2O atoms are not bonded to other H2O atoms. We still get fringes when doing the double slit underwater ..suggesting water is not large enough to be considered a spacetime object and cause decoherence.
I guess the same can be said about oxygen.
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #1 on: 22/07/2019 04:48:56 »
Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 03:23:37
H2O atoms are not bonded to other H2O atoms.

To some extent, they are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_bond
Logged
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #2 on: 22/07/2019 05:09:21 »
"on average about one in every 5.5 × 108 molecules gives up a proton to another water molecule"
Logged
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #3 on: 22/07/2019 13:31:58 »
Isn't it curious that water has at least three states (liquid, solid, gas) ..I'd say gas represents superposition.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #4 on: 22/07/2019 13:46:36 »
Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 13:31:58
Isn't it curious that water has at least three states (liquid, solid, gas)
No.
It's not curious.
In principle (almost) everything has at least two; solid and gas.
Those materials whose molecules are held together strongly enough also have a liquid state.
Helium has a 4th state.
There's a 5th state- plasma- that isn't so well defined for molecules- but exists for all elements.


Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 13:31:58
.I'd say gas represents superposition.
I doubt anyone else says so.
Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 05:09:21
"on average about one in every 5.5 × 10^8 molecules gives up a proton to another water molecule"
True, but proton transfer isn't the question here.
Hydrogen bonding occurs between pretty nearly all the molecules of water in the condensed phases.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #5 on: 22/07/2019 13:55:49 »
They aren't going to bond together enough to be considered a spacetime object. I wonder if the double slit has been performed with ice.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #6 on: 22/07/2019 14:48:49 »
What does this
Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 13:55:49
spacetime object.
mean?
And also what do you mean by this

Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 13:55:49
I wonder if the double slit has been performed with ice.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #7 on: 22/07/2019 14:52:48 »
An object that isn't going to go into superposition ..too large to be used in the double slit experiment.
I want to know if laser light still shows fringes when traveling through ice.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #8 on: 22/07/2019 15:35:32 »
None of that makes much sense.
Water molecules, even if stuck together in bunches are smaller than, for example, buckyballs, which have been shown to act in a wavelike manner when going through slits.

I have put a diffraction grating in some water in the freezer.
I can't imagine that it won't work when the water freezes, but it's a trivial experiment so why not just do it?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #9 on: 22/07/2019 15:44:30 »
yes, smaller than buckballs ..so they are not spacetime objects they are only part of the quantum field. Light doesn't collapse until it hits something considered a spacetime object. Do water molecules keep their quantum state when frozen?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #10 on: 22/07/2019 16:04:15 »
Quote from: pittsburghjoe on 22/07/2019 15:44:30
Do water molecules keep their quantum state
What do you think "quantum state" means?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #11 on: 22/07/2019 16:06:56 »
I want a quantum computer made with water. If the spin can be stored ..it would be 10x more valuable than the current light ones.
Logged
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #12 on: 22/07/2019 20:33:21 »
What's not to love about a steampunk quantum computer?
Logged
 



Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #13 on: 22/07/2019 22:49:33 »
We are mostly water, maybe our brains are quantum after all.
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #14 on: 23/07/2019 01:41:00 »
Quote from: PitssburghJoe
suggesting water is not large enough to be considered a spacetime object and cause decoherence.
Another way of looking at "decoherence" is "becoming entangled with the rest of the universe".

Every time a water molecule collides with another water molecule, or donates a proton (or attracts an extra proton), its quantum state becomes entangled with the other water molecule/ion.

Because of hydrogen bonding, water interacts very strongly with all surrounding molecules, and so decoherence occurs frequently. Perhaps in a rarified gas the decoherence time will be a bit longer.

Quote
If the spin can be stored
I expect that angular momentum of the water molecule will be quantised.
A water molecule has multiple vibration modes, and every time a water molecule bumps into another water molecule, these quantised vibration and angular momentum states change in complex ways.

Quote
I want a quantum computer made with water.
For a quantum computer, you want to maximise the decoherence time, and allow controlled quantum interactions with other quantum objects.
- Light has a very long decoherence time (almost a microsecond, in optical fiber, at room temperature), but it is very hard to get a specific photon to interact with another specific photon in a controlled way.
- Water has too many vibrational states for these interactions to be easily controlled (you would need to bombard it with infra-red or microwaves of just the right wavelength and phase).
- What you want is something with fewer quantum states than a water molecule, but stronger interactions than a photon. Preferably something with 2 states (1 or 0) that can become entangled in a controlled way (allowing states defined by 2 complex numbers)
- But to get a coherence time of 1 microsecond, most materials have to be cooled within a whisker of absolute zero.
Logged
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #15 on: 23/07/2019 02:03:01 »
We shouldn't ever get fringes underwater if everything is decohering.
« Last Edit: 23/07/2019 03:07:15 by pittsburghjoe »
Logged
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #16 on: 23/07/2019 03:19:59 »
If light sees water as a solid body of touching molecules ..it should be acting like a photon, not waves.
Logged
 



Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #17 on: 23/07/2019 03:37:15 »
I think it means water is quantum no matter the quantity.
Logged
 

Offline pittsburghjoe (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 89
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #18 on: 23/07/2019 13:29:17 »
oh, I got an answer here "There is no absorption and re-emission process when light travels in a transparent medium. Medium does absorb some portion of the light, but no re-emission happens, or re-emission is so small that it can be neglected."

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/490324/why-the-randomness-in-glass-water-air-does-not-destroy-coherence-of-light-over-f


Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is liquid water a giant pile of quantum material?
« Reply #19 on: 23/07/2019 15:41:00 »
Quote from: pittsburghjoe
We shouldn't ever get fringes underwater if everything is decohering.
What are you measuring the interference patterns of?
- Interference patterns of light: Light can pass through pure water quite well, without being scattered. In this case, you will get fringes in water just as you do in glass, air or a vacuum. However, the spacing of the firnges will vary because light travels at a different speed through different media.
- Interfering patterns of water molecules: Water molecules can't pass through solid or liquid water very well at all, as the water molecule will bump into all the other water molecules, and you won't get fringes in the double-slit experiment (the hydrogen bonds don't help, either!). If you want to create interference patterns of water molecules, you will need to do it in a vacuum. (...and the hydrogen bonds won't help, either!)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: quantum 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.679 seconds with 75 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.